Jump to content

Transmission intermittently disengaging after torque converter change.

Charles Vella
 Share

Recommended Posts

Charles Vella New Member

Charles Vella

Posted
Posted

I have a 16 silverado 1500 5.3 6l80 that started to shutter so I replaced the torque converter. After doing this I replaced the fluid with ac delco dex 6 and ensured the fluid was at the right level. I drove the care for 5-8 miles to test it, the next day I pulled out of my driveway and the vehicle was bucking and not engaging the transmission as if it did not have fluid. I checked the dip stick and it was at the correct level, I then dropped the pan and noticed the a lot of black sediment at the bottom of the pan(no shavings or big metal chips). The filter appeared to be clogged, so i changed the fluid and filter and then was able to drive around 40 miles before this happened again. Does this sound like a i need to rinse and repeat this process until the sediment that was jostled free during the converter swap is gone or is my transmission done for?

BC322431-DB6C-4756-A023-4C84969A6D84.jpeg

Snowcamo Senior Enthusiast

Snowcamo

Posted
Posted (edited)

Time for a rebuild. Contrary to popular belief this happens more then will be admitted. Changing the fluid is a death sentence for the transmission with decent milage.

 

Over the years I have gathered the detergent of the new fluid cleans and washes away the sediment that is within the clutch packs. While that sounds cool its actually counter productive as that very grit came from the clutch packs and aids in grip.

 

I'm sure others will say otherwise, but let this be a lesson for future reference. Don't change the fluid.

Edited by Snowcamo
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted (edited)

Converter failure always takes out more than the converter.  Most take at least the pump housings, many wipe out clutches and the TECHM.

 

Needed to come more apart to see what else failed to begin with.  

Edited by newdude
Snowcamo Senior Enthusiast

Snowcamo

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Charles Vella said:

I have a 16 silverado 1500 5.3 6l80 that started to shutter so I replaced the torque converter. After doing this I replaced the fluid with ac delco dex 6 and ensured the fluid was at the right level. I drove the care for 5-8 miles to test it, the next day I pulled out of my driveway and the vehicle was bucking and not engaging the transmission as if it did not have fluid. I checked the dip stick and it was at the correct level, I then dropped the pan and noticed the a lot of black sediment at the bottom of the pan(no shavings or big metal chips). The filter appeared to be clogged, so i changed the fluid and filter and then was able to drive around 40 miles before this happened again. Does this sound like a i need to rinse and repeat this process until the sediment that was jostled free during the converter swap is gone or is my transmission done for?

BC322431-DB6C-4756-A023-4C84969A6D84.jpeg

Did you fill to converter before installing?

Charles Vella New Member

Charles Vella

Posted
  • Author
Posted
19 minutes ago, Snowcamo said:

Did you fill to converter before installing?

Yes, refilled as much as i could. I spun the tq and rocked it and jostled it to ensure the fluid would make it all around the tq before installing. I replaced the input shaft oring as well.

  • Like 1
Snowcamo Senior Enthusiast

Snowcamo

Posted
Posted (edited)

Ok. Well here's to a successful long lasting rebuild. Look into sonnax for upgrade parts kit. They are the solution to these transmissions. 

 

Note these transmissions have pressure issues. Most try to bump the line pressure up via tune and that's cool, but is not the proper solve. 

 

In your case you noticed shuttering. That shows a lower the required fluid pressure issue somewhere. 

 

May you be blessed.

Edited by Snowcamo
WT35002017 Enthusiast

WT35002017

Posted
Posted

I’m not an expert. I finally received a stall converter that I ordered about 2 months ago but I won’t have time to replace mine for another couple months.  I’m very interested in not having my linings self destruct before I can replace the converter but I wasn’t able to change the lockup programming on the TCM until about 2 months ago with HP Tuners. The stock programming is part of the problem with these trucks. It allows for slip all the time for a smoother ride but it prematurely can and will wear the lockup surface which then pollutes the transmission. If you were driving fine and you suddenly lost forward or reverse gears, it could be the plastic balls in your valve body getting stuck in the the holes. I believe Sonnax makes a rebuild kit for valve body and they also make stronger parts for the rest of the transmission. If I were dealing with it I would pull the tranny and inspect all clutch packs and clean the whole thing out. Look at the pump first of course as that will be tell tale of what’s deeper in but I definitely would not try to solve it by flushing further at this point. If the lining material just disintegrated without galling the pump and the subsequent shifts in the tranny didn’t happen at low pressure thereby trashing everything, you could be lucky but thoroughly inspecting is now required in my opinion. I would have to rent another truck meantime to keep my business going. Do what’s necessary, otherwise you could waste a lot of money. Good luck.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • scotthvac.net
      2022-24 halogen - led grille swap

      By scotthvac.net · Posted

      2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • davester
      Replacement Radiator

      By davester · Posted

      And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • davester
      Turning radius

      By davester · Posted

      Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...