Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What is the normal fuel rail pressure for a 2017 Sierra with a 6.2?  I am chasing a no start condition along with a P00C6 - Fuel Rail Pressure Too Low - Engine Cranking Bank 1.   I'm not sure what normal is. While checking it with key on and cranking, I have seen it anywhere from 520 - 600 kpa which is like 75-85 psi.  What should it be?

Posted (edited)
On 6/22/2022 at 10:06 AM, dragstang86 said:

What is the normal fuel rail pressure for a 2017 Sierra with a 6.2?  I am chasing a no start condition along with a P00C6 - Fuel Rail Pressure Too Low - Engine Cranking Bank 1.   I'm not sure what normal is. While checking it with key on and cranking, I have seen it anywhere from 520 - 600 kpa which is like 75-85 psi.  What should it be?

 

 

So key on engine off and not cranking, are you are getting 75-85psi?  You need to be able to read your high side fuel pressure.  Sounds like you are only reading the low side.  

 

These engines are direct injected engines, so the fuel system has two sides to it.  The low side and the high side.  Low side is from the tank to the input on the high pressure fuel pump.  The high side is the high pressure pump to the injectors so HPFP, fuel rails and injectors.  

 

Rail pressure on these DI engines is MUCH higher than 75psi.  Engine on idle, it should be making 500-700psi, up to 2500psi at WOT.  Cranking psi about 300-400psi.  It is quite likely that your high pressure fuel pump is no good and needs to be replaced.

 

I would get a hold of a scanner that can read the fuel high pressure sensor data and see what the pump is making during cranking.  

 

There is one other possibility for this code, and its a possible issue where the cam position actuator solenoid valve could be intermittently sticking, but this ones requires some extra diag work. 

Edited by newdude

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...