Jump to content

2021 GMC Sierra lifter failure

patstick
 Share

Recommended Posts

patstick New Member

patstick

Posted
Posted

I have a 2021 GMC sierra with a 5.3 L that had a lifter failure at 9K the dealer replaced both banks of lifters on both sides. My question is has anyone else had a similar repair and if so has it been successful I was hoping to get good long use out of this truck but I’m questioning whether I should just get rid of it and move on to something else thanks in advance 

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

You're not alone having lifter failure. Look around this site.

Stop the motor from going into V4 mode, there are several ways to prevent it.

Shorter oil changes and consider better oil like Amsoil.

The lifters are a poor design, some fail, some don't.

John813 Enthusiast

John813

Posted
Posted

At end of day if you aren't happy with the truck, or have that lingering thought of durability, then evaluate the cost to move on and see if it's worth it. 

 

Rams still have AFM and their lifters have durability issues but seem to fail later on compared to your mileage. TBD on their new 3.0L TT 6. I would avoid first year anything FCA engines. 

 

I've had 3 ecoboost vehicles and all 3 had issues, one was a defective head, cam phaser failure etc... My brothers Gen 2 Raptor had his cam phaser fail as well and there's been plently saying they failed a 2nd time.  

 

To be determined on if your new lifters it may last another 100k+ or 9k before they go out again. I've read some on forums/facebook groups that had no issues post one failure/some that never had failure going on 100k+ miles. 

It's a bad design imo. 

 

My plan of action is to delete the DFM completely with new parts and a tune once the powertrain expires. I knew going into this truck the lifters were a potential weak point. 

 

patstick New Member

patstick

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yes I have seen the other posts on this farm I guess nobody has put enough mileage on the fix yet just very disheartening they have a brand new truck and have this issue and I know I’m not alone still very upsetting thank you for your response

  • 4 weeks later...
RetCPO Enthusiast

RetCPO

Posted
Posted

2020 AT4 5.3 I run in L9, dfm won't kick in. Lose 10th gear but I'm not worried about mpg difference.

RetCPO Enthusiast

RetCPO

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, patstick said:

How do you run in L9

Shift to L and then toggle the + button on the gear shift, it will display L2 , L3 and so on. Stop when L9 is displayed on the dash. Transmission will then shift normally up to 9th gear. dfm will not activate. 

mwlewis558 Enthusiast

mwlewis558

Posted
Posted
On 7/19/2022 at 9:17 AM, John813 said:

My plan of action is to delete the DFM completely with new parts and a tune once the powertrain expires. I knew going into this truck the lifters were a potential weak point. 

 

How will you delete the DFM? I've been looking for a way to do this and haven't seen anything. I assume it would be an engine rebuild and that doesn't scare me because I am willing to pay it if I know my truck will not have any DFM related issues down the road. My goal is to drive this truck to minimum 250k. 

Jac365 Enthusiast

Jac365

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, mwlewis558 said:

How will you delete the DFM? I've been looking for a way to do this and haven't seen anything. I assume it would be an engine rebuild and that doesn't scare me because I am willing to pay it if I know my truck will not have any DFM related issues down the road. My goal is to drive this truck to minimum 250k. 

 

Range inc. offers two methods for disabling DFM. One is the Range box. (plugs in to OBD port). I have this my truck. Bought it to disable AFM on my 2012 Sierra 5.3. When I got the 2019 AT4 I sent the box to Range and they updated it for DFM and sent it back, free of charge. Works well, even disables the auto stop crap 90% of the time, even though it's not designed for that purpose. The other is a Range Pulsar. More costly but more features. The pulsar piggy backs the electronics and allows the user to disable DFM and auto stop, recalibrate top speed, recalibrate for tire size, recalibrate tire pressure max and mins and recalibrate throttle sensitivity. If the Pulsar is removed everything goes back to factory settings.

 

(NOTE: I am not affiliated with Range INC an any shape or form, just a customer.

Snakes709 Enthusiast

Snakes709

Posted
Posted

Smh. Using range, pulsar or putting it in l9 doesnt stop the issue. It will disable the truck from using dfm but the shitty parts are still being used in the motor. Only true way of deleting it is a new camshaft, new lifters and physically swap out all the parts that are used and get a legit custom tune. 

Byrds8 Enthusiast

Byrds8

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 8/19/2022 at 9:47 AM, Snakes709 said:

Smh. Using range, pulsar or putting it in l9 doesnt stop the issue. It will disable the truck from using dfm but the shitty parts are still being used in the motor. Only true way of deleting it is a new camshaft, new lifters and physically swap out all the parts that are used and get a legit custom tune. 

While you are correct, changing out those parts will 100% solve the issue, you are incorrect in the fact that disabling DFM does not also solve the issue. From what I have read on here and other places, disabling DFM/AFM does in fact keep lifters from failing in the way they fail with it active.

Edited by Byrds8
Snakes709 Enthusiast

Snakes709

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Byrds8 said:

While you are correct, changing out those parts will 100% solve the issue, you are incorrect in the fact that disabling DFM does not also solve the issue. From what I have read on here and other places, disabling DFM/AFM does in fact keep lifters from failing in the way they fail with it active.

I have seen no proof of that at all. I see just as many lifter failures on trucks where owners disable dfm as owners that dont. Even the service advisor that i dealt with that was extremely knowledgeable on this topic said he has had just as may owners come in that disable it. You cant “tune” out a hardware issue. 

Byrds8 Enthusiast

Byrds8

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Snakes709 said:

I have seen no proof of that at all. I see just as many lifter failures on trucks where owners disable dfm as owners that dont. Even the service advisor that i dealt with that was extremely knowledgeable on this topic said he has had just as may owners come in that disable it. You cant “tune” out a hardware issue. 

Well, just like most things, you take any service advisors word with a grain of salt. Every service advisor I have spoken with about it will flat out say if you disable AFM/DFM the lifters wont fail. Its due to the activation of it that is causing the issues. I am not here to argue, I am just pointing out what I have learned much as yourself. There are articles discussing this subject though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      summer road trips in the 2026 2500HD

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Aimatdeer
      Ac not keeping up

      By Aimatdeer · Posted

      Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...