Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes leaf spring U bolts, this is the thread, usefull and good read most is.  I did check my bolts on the ground using 60ft lbs setting, all rear (2 on either side) got half a turn to get to 60, fronts were all ready there using X pattern to check.  Did not plus 130 degree as seems the proper torque is 59 lbs plus 130 degrees. Wont be on interstate to try for a while yet.

I live 10 miles away from interstate where i can get up to 70 plus and doesn't seem to show any change with temps only does in/out minor vibration above 68 mph ish all the way up to the truck shuts off over 100. like a wheel weight missing but not consistent but in and out. Mine was not there brand new off the lot, picked truck up in Michigan and drove 800  miles home and few thousand more before noticed it. There was a TSB on the 14-18 and up to 20 trucks about retorquing u bolts. Worth a shot i figure. 

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Elimination update 3/5/24

New driveshaft no change

proper torqued U bolts no change

removed Adaptive Ride Control fuse no change as far as vibration at highway speeds

removed tonneau cover no change

Adjusted cold TP from 30-36 no change

 

I am starting to believe it is DFM related or transmission related.  Wish my truck was one of the ones without the cylinder deactivation that were produced, that would eliminate DFM and bring it to transmission.

 

 

Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, Kevin0311 said:

Elimination update 3/5/24

New driveshaft no change

proper torqued U bolts no change

removed Adaptive Ride Control fuse no change as far as vibration at highway speeds

removed tonneau cover no change

Adjusted cold TP from 30-36 no change

 

I am starting to believe it is DFM related or transmission related.  Wish my truck was one of the ones without the cylinder deactivation that were produced, that would eliminate DFM and bring it to transmission.

 

 

This is EXACTLY what I think. While, I have tried driving without DFM, by downshifting and all sorts of things, I think it actually might be a combination of things. Mine idles with a little lope sometimes, too, which I think might contribute when moving at low highway speeds, because that's kind of just off idle. But, then again, that doesn't help explain why mine runs smoothest below 60mph and once I hit 90+mph.

Edited by MrLeadFoot
Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, MrLeadFoot said:

This is EXACTLY what I think. While, I have tried driving without DFM, by downshifting and all sorts of things, I think it actually might be a combination of things. Mine idles with a little lope sometimes, too, which I think might contribute when moving at low highway speeds, because that's kind of just off idle. But, then again, that doesn't help explain why mine runs smoothest below 60mph and once I hit 90+mph.

Mrleadfoot I have a 2019 and I have that seems to be a vibration that starts at 60mph like turning on a switch and goes away at 80+ smooth as butter below 60mph, I have tried all the things mentioned above with no luck except drive shaft iam starting to think its wind turbulence I don't know. 

Edited by Silverado4x4
Posted
4 hours ago, Silverado4x4 said:

Mrleadfoot I have a 2019 and I have that seems to be a vibration that starts at 60mph like turning on a switch and goes away at 80+ smooth as butter below 60mph, I have tried all the things mentioned above with no luck except drive shaft iam starting to think its wind turbulence I don't know. 

That's an interesting thought. Are you lifted or leveled in any way, and do you have stocks wheels and tires? I am completely stock, except I now have the 20" wheels optioned wheels I purchased later in addition to the 22" wheels that came with my truck. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, MrLeadFoot said:

That's an interesting thought. Are you lifted or leveled in any way, and do you have stocks wheels and tires? I am completely stock, except I now have the 20" wheels optioned wheels I purchased later in addition to the 22" wheels that came with my truck. 

Nope all stock Z71 with 18" wheels stock tires, replaced tires about 2yrs ago it made no change.

Posted
3 hours ago, Kevin0311 said:

8 or 10 speed transmission?

 

8 speed had the new fluid flush at about 8000 miles due to the shutter which fixed it and tranny shifts smooth since, have about 29,000 on the truck now.

Posted
19 hours ago, Silverado4x4 said:

8 speed had the new fluid flush at about 8000 miles due to the shutter which fixed it and tranny shifts smooth since, have about 29,000 on the truck now.

Was the shudder different than the vibration you feel now? If so, can you please elaborate a little? I ask, because I was thinking it might be transmission related, so your feedback would be helpful. It is hard for me to believe something as simple as different fluid fixed the "Chevy Shake", and wonder if perhaps it didn't completely fix it. Or, do you think it has nothing to do with the shudder you were previously feeling?

Posted
16 hours ago, MrLeadFoot said:

Was the shudder different than the vibration you feel now? If so, can you please elaborate a little? I ask, because I was thinking it might be transmission related, so your feedback would be helpful. It is hard for me to believe something as simple as different fluid fixed the "Chevy Shake", and wonder if perhaps it didn't completely fix it. Or, do you think it has nothing to do with the shudder you were previously feeling?

The shutter I felt before the fluid change is not the same as now, and this is not a Trans shutter that problem is gone after the fluid change.  My wife can't feel it and it's not a vibration like unbalanced tires. If I have a pretty heavy load in the bed its not there starts at 60mph and gone at around 75 to 80mph unloaded. That's why I think it's wind turbulence. 

 

Posted
On 3/5/2024 at 4:12 PM, Kevin0311 said:

Elimination update 3/5/24

New driveshaft no change

proper torqued U bolts no change

removed Adaptive Ride Control fuse no change as far as vibration at highway speeds

removed tonneau cover no change

Adjusted cold TP from 30-36 no change

 

I am starting to believe it is DFM related or transmission related.  Wish my truck was one of the ones without the cylinder deactivation that were produced, that would eliminate DFM and bring it to transmission.

 

 

This is certainly not what we like to hear, Kevin0311.  Please know, customer satisfaction is extremely important to us. Our team would be more than happy to take a closer look into the concerns with your 2023 Chevrolet Silverado. To do so, please send an email to [email protected] with ATTN: Kevin0311/GM Trucks in the subject line.

Please include your contact information, VIN, a brief description of your concern, and the name of your preferred dealership. We look forward to hearing from you. To learn more about GM’s Privacy Policy, please visit https://www.gm.com/privacy-statement.html. The information you provide may be monitored and recorded and is subject to the GM Privacy Statement.
 
Privacy Statement | General Motors
Your privacy is important to General Motors. This Privacy Statement addresses the personal information GM collects and how GM handles that personal information.
www.gm.com
 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, GMCustomerService said:

This is certainly not what we like to hear, Kevin0311.  Please know, customer satisfaction is extremely important to us. Our team would be more than happy to take a closer look into the concerns with your 2023 Chevrolet Silverado. To do so, please send an email to [email protected] with ATTN: Kevin0311/GM Trucks in the subject line.

Please include your contact information, VIN, a brief description of your concern, and the name of your preferred dealership. We look forward to hearing from you. To learn more about GM’s Privacy Policy, please visit https://www.gm.com/privacy-statement.html. The information you provide may be monitored and recorded and is subject to the GM Privacy Statement.
 
Privacy Statement | General Motors
Your privacy is important to General Motors. This Privacy Statement addresses the personal information GM collects and how GM handles that personal information.
www.gm.com
 

How come you aren't contacting me, too? I started this thread with my whole issue, and Kevin0311 has the same problem. We have both taken pains to try to rectify this, and both have spent our own money, too. So, why aren't you trying to help BOTH of us?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

last week i put original tires/wheels that the truck came with on and same vibration.  Ordered new oem rotors and they showed up yesterday will install them this weekend and check for hub runout when all apart. Drove to Bristol TN and back over the weekend 1700 miles and could find no rhyme or reason or condition to get it to change, vibration from 68-75 the worst, seems to fade some above 75 but still there. 

Rotors, hub runout (looking for bent axle) and rear diff locker next areas to look at, changed the diff fluid last week (with oem fluid and gasket) before the trip south and all looked good back there no excess metal or chipped gear, all bearings looked fine. 

 

i did have my tire guy unmount my tires from the rims and check the "true/balance" of rims and they were all out some but one was 4.5oz out of round, these are OEM GM accessory wheels.  I do not know what they should be but i would think close to true 0 but don't know, he remounted tires, rotated 180 degrees on rims from what they were and rebalanced, all balanced out with weight but roadforce was off quite a bit on all, one was a 49 with the machine showing the best it would be able to get by adjusting things again (rotating tire on rim) would be 45 others were under these numbers but upper 20's was best. All the tire info means to me is needs weights to get balanced, doesn't matter anyway as no different in any position on the truck front/rear/left/right.

I still believe something out of balance on the truck driveline and will continue searching.  Aero has crossed my mind but nothing looked out of wack when i had the truck up on my lift doing the rear diff fluid. My 2019 i owned before this never had a issue same 6.2 with 10 speed same trim.  

 

GM customer service:  I did take to my local dealer to have them look into my vibration concerns described in my posts on this forum, i was charged a fee and their diagnosis was could not duplicate customer concern, some irregular tire wear might be causing the vibration that the customer is feeling. 

 

With 5 GM vehicles currently in my garage was disappointing to get that answer and no help to fix the problem.  Trust me i know the saying if you want it done right have to do it yourself.

Edited by Kevin0311
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Kevin0311 said:

last week i put original tires/wheels that the truck came with on and same vibration.  Ordered new oem rotors and they showed up yesterday will install them this weekend and check for hub runout when all apart. Drove to Bristol TN and back over the weekend 1700 miles and could find no rhyme or reason or condition to get it to change, vibration from 68-75 the worst, seems to fade some above 75 but still there. 

Rotors, hub runout (looking for bent axle) and rear diff locker next areas to look at, changed the diff fluid last week (with oem fluid and gasket) before the trip south and all looked good back there no excess metal or chipped gear, all bearings looked fine. 

 

i did have my tire guy unmount my tires from the rims and check the "true/balance" of rims and they were all out some but one was 4.5oz out of round, these are OEM GM accessory wheels.  I do not know what they should be but i would think close to true 0 but don't know, he remounted tires, rotated 180 degrees on rims from what they were and rebalanced, all balanced out with weight but roadforce was off quite a bit on all, one was a 49 with the machine showing the best it would be able to get by adjusting things again (rotating tire on rim) would be 45 others were under these numbers but upper 20's was best. All the tire info means to me is needs weights to get balanced, doesn't matter anyway as no different in any position on the truck front/rear/left/right.

I still believe something out of balance on the truck driveline and will continue searching.  Aero has crossed my mind but nothing looked out of wack when i had the truck up on my lift doing the rear diff fluid. My 2019 i owned before this never had a issue same 6.2 with 10 speed same trim.  

 

GM customer service:  I did take to my local dealer to have them look into my vibration concerns described in my posts on this forum, i was charged a fee and their diagnosis was could not duplicate customer concern, some irregular tire wear might be causing the vibration that the customer is feeling. 

 

With 5 GM vehicles currently in my garage was disappointing to get that answer and no help to fix the problem.  Trust me i know the saying if you want it done right have to do it yourself.

I've done the route with wheels and tires. In fact, two dealerships have put a total of 8 stock 22" rims and 12 tires on my truck, to no avail, all within two months starting when my truck had 500 miles on it. Both dealerships road forced tire after tire after tire, and replaced them all until they got as low as 17 and highest was 25, if I recall correctly. They even had a GM rep come out and run a Pico test, only to say this vibration is "normal".

 

First of all, everyone who's been involved with my truck knows there is something out of balance, which is why they got authorization to put up to 8 rims and 12 tires on the truck, and have a Pico test done. If they didn't feel what I was talking about, they wouldn't have gone through all this right from the get go, now, would they? One of the managers felt it HAS to be the 22" wheels, and suggested I try 20" wheels, because it seemed to be less noticeable when I swapped with a friend's 20" wheels on his 2020 Chevy for a test.

 

But, before I did that, under GM's suggestion, I took it to yet another dealer who checked driveshaft, brakes and runout, and found nothing wrong. 

 

So, I bit the bullet and bought brand-new 2022 stock take-off 20" wheels. While it runs smoother due to the taller profile, because they are the AT tires instead of the performance street tires that come stock on the 22" wheels, it's not really a good straight comparison, but it still vibrates with not much change. I didn't get a chance to drive it all that much with the 20" wheels because winter came and those stock tires on the 20" rims are terrible in wet weather so I put the 22" back on for winter because those tires are amazing in the wet. They handle like it's dry. 

 

It's probably my imagination, but I want to say that after putting the 22" back on, the speed at which it vibrates the most seems to have changed since I had the 22" on the truck previously. Just like you noticed, my vibration was right in the sweet spot of freeway driving, from about 64 to 78mph. I now noticed it seems to the worst at closer to 80, but at 90mph, it becomes the smoothest, just like when you have tires out of balance. Because the vibration range seems to have changed, it makes me wonder if it's not rims and tires at all, and just FEELS like a wheel vibration, and that maybe a software update has changed something that has caused the vibration to move to a different point, I don't know. Remember, I've had 8 rims and 12 tires on in the 22" size, and 4 rims and 4 tires in the 20" size, so it's hard to remember every little thing.

 

My next move is to put back on the 20" wheels in different positions to see what I find, because now I've had a real good chance to evaluate the best balanced  22" stock setup, with a short time of the 20" wheels in between. So, now I will be able to better assess if the 20" really do make a difference. I did notice before, though, that while the 20" were noticeably smoother over uneven roads, the truck bounced noticeably more and swayed way more in the corners, so I am also going to play with tire pressure this time around o the 22", too.

 

I researched the lemon law extensively, and have consulted with a lemon law attorney who is chomping at the bit for my case. I don't blame him because I think it's obvious by all the examinations they did, and the rental cars GM paid for, that GM already know there's a problem. They wouldn't have authorized all the time spent if they didn't think something was wrong with my truck. I also documented everything and had opened a case with GM corporate at 11 miles on the truck. The attorney says I have time to do whatever else more I want to try before we file the case because I'm well within the time frame to file. I don't really want to, but more and more, it's looking like I don't have a choice. It's not right to spend $80k and have to drive something that feels like it's got out of balance tires shaking down the road. 

Edited by MrLeadFoot
Posted (edited)

where did they clamp the wires for the pico test?  Do you know what rear your truck has an AAM or GM one? GM has 3 fins on top AAM does not.

Info in this link: #:~:text=AAM%20axles%20were%20supplier%2

 

Mine is AAM

.5" AAM rear:

9.5INCHAAM.thumb.jpg.dd208a09e9e9d2deb30fb31ccd0e7bde.jpg


9.5" GM rear:

9.5INCHGM.thumb.jpg.8b729718718c0ee056676b7f3a3bd882.jpg


AAM Front:

AAMFRONTAXLE.thumb.jpg.f51dc2f235f505a563ef4bc0c7267665.jpg






GM Front:
 

GMFRTAXLE.thumb.jpg.f8cf90cc8827c094ca24af7f07258e20.jpg

 

Edited by Kevin0311

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,914
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    AidenVorpagel
    Newest Member
    AidenVorpagel
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 614 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • hello I recently bought a 2012 gmc 1500 with a 5.3 and have a AFM disabler on it I'm interested in doing a cam but I'm worried if I remove the AFM system I will fail smog does anyone have info if they are able to detect that or a work around to it (not talking about hot smogging) please let me know thank you  
    • Update. I started chasing down my symptoms. Started first with pulling valve covers and looked at everything. Everything looked good and couldn't hear or feel anything different. Then a compression test. 240 psi or really close on each cylinder. I was worried I was a tooth off of timing. Not bad for an engine with 173,000. Granted I did put new heads on. I sprayed water around the injector area to see if I could hear a change. Nothing. I hooked up my new hp tuner which I should have done in the first place but I don't really know what I'm looking at just yet but am learning. I noticed the fuel trims were way off so that told me I have to have either a bad injector or exhaust leak. New injectors, so I did the shop vac on blower and in the tail pipe. Sprayed soapy water and found the exhaust flange on the drivers side was leaking. I didn't think it would be that considereding I pulled the heads and left the manifolds attached. I did have the transmission replaced not long ago. They must have not seated them properly but I guess I didn't notice. I put in new gaskets on both sides. Which by the way isn't a bad job but I had a hard time getting them to seal right. Took two attempts. Reset the fuel trims and the ticking is gone, engine runs smooth and acceleration has improved. Got to feel the real difference with that stage 1 cam. It's not that big of a difference but it does add a little more. It feels like how the truck should have been from the factory.
    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...