Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So went cruising the local Chevy dealership after hours on Friday (I hate going during business hours when I'm still not sure what I want) to see if I could compare Double Cab to Crew.

 

Lucky enough they had a 24 Custom double cab and 3500 Crew Cab sitting right next to each other, unlocked.

 

Got in the Custom, which had no step so it seemed rather high to get in, daughter climbed in behind me using the bed to see how seating would be (she's the tallest kid). Seating wasn't too bad.

 

Popped the hood because I wanted to see just how hard it is to reach anything under the hood. Can't reach crap without some kind of step ladder! It was raining so I had to actually jump to get enough hand on the hood to pull it closed without my fingers slipping off.

 

Looked at the sticker and saw it was $50,******. I thought damn that seems cheap for a Custom. Especially because it had $1,500 in options. That'd when I noticed it said 2wd.

 

When did 2wd trucks become so tall?!?! They used to be considerably shorter than 4wd models. Is it just because it's the Custom with factory 20" wheels?

 

Also did not realize the Custom came with push button start until I sat in this one. But it doesn't have the touch to unlock/lock door handles. That just seems stupid. I already have to have the key fob out to unlock the door. That defeats the luxury of just touching the handle, then pushing the button.

Posted

I read somewhere the Custom/WT 24 models have the 23 dash/instrumentation and it is the LT and up trims that have the new dash. 

 

Since you sat in a Custom, is that factual? Also I haven't been able to compare a double cab vs crew cab. Big difference?

Posted
10 hours ago, nick112288 said:

So went cruising the local Chevy dealership after hours on Friday (I hate going during business hours when I'm still not sure what I want) to see if I could compare Double Cab to Crew.

 

Lucky enough they had a 24 Custom double cab and 3500 Crew Cab sitting right next to each other, unlocked.

 

Got in the Custom, which had no step so it seemed rather high to get in, daughter climbed in behind me using the bed to see how seating would be (she's the tallest kid). Seating wasn't too bad.

 

Popped the hood because I wanted to see just how hard it is to reach anything under the hood. Can't reach crap without some kind of step ladder! It was raining so I had to actually jump to get enough hand on the hood to pull it closed without my fingers slipping off.

 

Looked at the sticker and saw it was $50,******. I thought damn that seems cheap for a Custom. Especially because it had $1,500 in options. That'd when I noticed it said 2wd.

 

When did 2wd trucks become so tall?!?! They used to be considerably shorter than 4wd models. Is it just because it's the Custom with factory 20" wheels?

 

Also did not realize the Custom came with push button start until I sat in this one. But it doesn't have the touch to unlock/lock door handles. That just seems stupid. I already have to have the key fob out to unlock the door. That defeats the luxury of just touching the handle, then pushing the button.

 

 

The 20 inch wheels use a 34 inch diameter tire (275/65R20).  Adds some height for sure.  

 

The big height changes came back in 2011 when the all new GMT-900 frame was introduced.  Prior to that the 07-10 GMT-900s still rode on the old GMT-800 frame that came out in 2001.  The addition of the taller 18 and 20 inch tires came for 2020.  

 

All the 2024 HD have push button start, no matter the trim.  This was a result of changing to the new GM VIP electrical platform they now use.  The passive keyless entry is delegated to LT and higher, WT and Custom don't get it.  2020-2023 were keyed ignition on WT and Custom.  

Posted
39 minutes ago, IDBrett said:

I read somewhere the Custom/WT 24 models have the 23 dash/instrumentation and it is the LT and up trims that have the new dash. 

 

Since you sat in a Custom, is that factual? Also I haven't been able to compare a double cab vs crew cab. Big difference?

 

Correct, same dash as the previous model years. I'm not sure I'm sold on the digital everything (dash and giant infotainment screen) so I'm not sure that the WT and Custom having analog gauges with just a smaller screen between them is a bad thing.

 

As far as cab size there is a noticable difference, but I think it's a case of people fit vs people fit with tons of extra room.

 

I'm 5'11 and my daughter is a couple inches shorter than me. In the double cab the seat started out all the way back, and her knees just barely touched the back. I moved it up slightly, not even to what I'd call my driving position, and she said it was fine. The crew cab when the seat was all the way back there was still probably 5 to 6 inches from her knees touching it.

 

 

11 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

The 20 inch wheels use a 34 inch diameter tire (275/65R20).  Adds some height for sure.  

 

The big height changes came back in 2011 when the all new GMT-900 frame was introduced.  Prior to that the 07-10 GMT-900s still rode on the old GMT-800 frame that came out in 2001.  The addition of the taller 18 and 20 inch tires came for 2020.  

 

All the 2024 HD have push button start, no matter the trim.  This was a result of changing to the new GM VIP electrical platform they now use.  The passive keyless entry is delegated to LT and higher, WT and Custom don't get it.  2020-2023 were keyed ignition on WT and Custom.  

 

I knew there was a frame change, I just figued 2wd woud sit at least a little lower than 4wd.

 

I also didn't know push button came on even the WT. I thought it had a regular old keyed ignition. Still weird to have a push button ignition but doors you have to take the key/fob out for to get open.

Posted

Thanks @nick112288 for the insight! I've only sized up the crew cab and the kids seemed happy with the space. Doubt we could do the double cab. I'm 6'2" and would likely have the seat all the way to the rear. Your comments confirm it . Good to know on the dash layout. I do like the 23 style.

Posted (edited)

I love the space the crew cab provides. I have one forward facing car seat and two boosters in the back. Plenty of room and more than enough leg room. We also run six ppl in the truck on occasion so I wouldn’t have anything but a six passenger configuration. 
 

came from a double cab tundra and it’s of course a night and day difference for room. That truck was six passenger too but was just smaller inside all over. I don’t personally care for the look of the double cab GM trucks just because the two door handles are oddly spaced apart it just looks odd to me. The crew has evenly spaced door handles so it’s more aesthetically pleasing imo

Edited by Pryme
Posted
1 hour ago, IDBrett said:

Thanks @nick112288 for the insight! I've only sized up the crew cab and the kids seemed happy with the space. Doubt we could do the double cab. I'm 6'2" and would likely have the seat all the way to the rear. Your comments confirm it . Good to know on the dash layout. I do like the 23 style.

 

I'm a cheap bastard. If I can save some money by going double cab vs crew I would. BUT it will ultimately come to what the kids say haha

 

32 minutes ago, Pryme said:

I love the space the crew cab provides. I have one forward facing car seat and two boosters in the back. Plenty of room and more than enough leg room. We also run six ppl in the truck on occasion so I wouldn’t have anything but a six passenger configuration. 
 

came from a double cab tundra and it’s of course a night and day difference for room. That truck was six passenger too but was just smaller inside all over. I don’t personally care for the look of the double cab GM trucks just because the two door handles are oddly spaced apart it just looks odd to me. The crew has evenly spaced door handles so it’s more aesthetically pleasing imo

 

I do agree the shorter double cab doors look odd. I know a lot of people complain about it, but I would actually prefer the Ford style of rear doors that swing out backwards over the short doors Ram and GM use.

Posted
3 hours ago, nick112288 said:

 

I'm a cheap bastard. If I can save some money by going double cab vs crew I would. BUT it will ultimately come to what the kids say haha

 

 

I do agree the shorter double cab doors look odd. I know a lot of people complain about it, but I would actually prefer the Ford style of rear doors that swing out backwards over the short doors Ram and GM use.

I don’t like the actual functionality of those as you need to open a front door to open the rear. As far as double cabs go, my old tundra had the versatility of an actual stand alone door but the handle was not that noticeable how it blended into the side of the rear door. But overall I prefer the crew over all else

Posted
3 hours ago, Pryme said:

I don’t like the actual functionality of those as you need to open a front door to open the rear. As far as double cabs go, my old tundra had the versatility of an actual stand alone door but the handle was not that noticeable how it blended into the side of the rear door. But overall I prefer the crew over all else

 

Yeah the functionality is what I see a lot of people complain about on the Ford Supercab. I'm ok with the functionality, more so I like the more classic look vs the 1/2 size doors

Posted

At some point the 2wd used to be lower than the 4wd due to the front suspension being entirely different. I had a 2000 SIlverado 1500 double cab 2wd that had rack and pinion steering while the 4wd units had the std gearbox. The R&P really made that truck handle well. At some point in the late 2000's they changed to using the same front knuckles and springs on both 4wd and 2wd to keep the commonality of parts. From that point on the 2wd and 4wd both had essentially the same ride height. 

Posted

Had both crew and dbl cabs 2020+ 2500s.....I can get away with dbl as I don't have kids, wife, etc so it's just storage.....

 

If people will be riding in back a crew is definetly better choice....even kids grow up so......its also easier in a crew to use for storage

 

Think its like $1800 difference or close to that between the models

 

As far as how they look, doesn't bother me

 

Was so so close to buying dbl cab just last month but I waited too long, so ended up with crew....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,464 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
    • Do you have access to BP fuels? Some stations have Silver 91 E-0 priced the same as their 93 E-10.  There is a local Marathon with 90 alky free for $6 a gallon but I go down the road to BP for $5-ish. They also have a 100 E-0 but that stuff is $10 a pop. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...