Jump to content

Proper way to level AT4?

SierraStorm21
 Share

Recommended Posts

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
Posted (edited)

2021 GMC Sierra AT4 and looking to level it the proper way. The truck came with 33's (275/60/20) and I'm looking at getting new slightly bigger tires too (34's (275/65/20's) and not sure if this would affect the way I should do it.

 

I've read through several threads talking about you should replace the UCA's in the process due to angles being outside the factory tolerance and I completely understand that and willing to spend the extra $ to do it right.

 

Reading through various reviews of the numerous kits out there, I think I've settled on the Rough Country one that includes the UCA's. I've never lifted or leveled a truck before, so I'm new to this and want to make sure I'm getting it right. So if you have experience or wisdom in this arena, feel free to chime and let me know if I should be doing something different.

Edited by Mstorm18
Had tire sizes reversed
Texanfisherman Enthusiast

Texanfisherman

Posted
Posted (edited)

The 275/65 will fit without a level kit. Possible that an extreme tread may rub a little, but it will fit. If you want to level on the cheap, I personally would not install anything more than a 1” without also replacing a-arms to correct geometry and improve the ball joint. Just my $.02. I have the silverado with the factory 2” and will do the BDS arms when I swap the tires. I will run a 295/65 with a 2” level and the BDS arms. 

Edited by Texanfisherman
SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Texanfisherman said:

You have your current and desired tire sizes reversed, but the 275/65 will fit without a level kit. Possible that an extreme tread may rub a little, but it will fit. If you want to level on the cheap, I personally would not install anything more than a 1” without also replacing a-arms to correct geometry and improve the ball joint. Just my $.02. I have the silverado with the factory 2” and will do the BDS arms when I swap the tires. I will run a 295/65 with a 2” level and the BDS arms. 

Good catch. Thanks! Edited

a-arms? The UCA's, right? The kit I linked has new ones that come with it, is that not right?

Edited by Mstorm18
Texanfisherman Enthusiast

Texanfisherman

Posted
Posted

Yes, a-arms/UCAs same thing. This is what I am banking on: https://www.jackit.com/bds-121260.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9deiBhC1ARIsAHLjR2AH8h5vX_coGf8m9IH8Lxcw94-iiPk3Z34gA3d21xnTpKfHIzrYd4QaAqlMEALw_wcB

 

Same setup they use in their 4 or 6 lifts. Just in case I want to go higher later. More expensive, but hard to find anyone dissatisfied with BDS and their quality. 

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think the more I read up on this, that perhaps the best thing to do is just have the front shocks swapped out for the 5100 Bilsteins, the ride adjustable ones to get a 1.1" lift. Seems doing so keeps things more within spec while still getting a slight lift in the front. While it may not be completely leveled, it's better than stock. 

  • Like 1
Luc1f3r Enthusiast

Luc1f3r

Posted
Posted

To everyone who levels their trucks, do you never carry heavy loads or tow? The factory Rake is meant to compensate for that.

 

Also stock height AT4 will fit 35x12 general grabbers with a slight rub on the mud flaps at full lock.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Mstorm18 said:

I think the more I read up on this, that perhaps the best thing to do is just have the front shocks swapped out for the 5100 Bilsteins, the ride adjustable ones to get a 1.1" lift. Seems doing so keeps things more within spec while still getting a slight lift in the front. While it may not be completely leveled, it's better than stock. 

 

 

I'd still get arms.  Non AT4s with a leveling kit will still fail the UCA.  We've had two come in now, one with significant damage to other components.  

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, newdude said:

 

 

I'd still get arms.  Non AT4s with a leveling kit will still fail the UCA.  We've had two come in now, one with significant damage to other components.  

 

Ugh, good to know. Any reason not to get the Bilstein version of those if I go with the upgraded shocks?

 

https://cart.bilsteinus.com/details?id=2972832273118789803&fyv=true&Year=1490468497551627837&Make=7109127503953767713&Model=2312292685622996290&Submodel=2928454506658859972&Pos=Front Upper&En=3896745598793439258

 

Or is another brand a better option? 

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, Luc1f3r said:

To everyone who levels their trucks, do you never carry heavy loads or tow? The factory Rake is meant to compensate for that.

 

Also stock height AT4 will fit 35x12 general grabbers with a slight rub on the mud flaps at full lock.

I'm sure everyone knows that, but most that are going for that leveled look aren't towing or carrying heavy loads on a daily or even weekly basis. I surely don't and if I was, I'd just get air bags to compensate. It's all about the look.

 

I didn't want to go to 35's because I swapped out the factory flaps for the molded ones that hang down slightly lower to prevent rock throw from hitting the panels and that would require even more modifications. I think 34's are the best I'll get and I'm ok with that.

  • Like 1
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Mstorm18 said:

 

Ugh, good to know. Any reason not to get the Bilstein version of those if I go with the upgraded shocks?

 

https://cart.bilsteinus.com/details?id=2972832273118789803&fyv=true&Year=1490468497551627837&Make=7109127503953767713&Model=2312292685622996290&Submodel=2928454506658859972&Pos=Front Upper&En=3896745598793439258

 

Or is another brand a better option? 

 

 

Can't speak on them really but from quick reading at that link, they appear to be engineered for use with a lift strut like theirs so would be a good move to pair them with their struts.  It does say not compatible with lift spacers which is interesting so I wonder if there is a clearance or geometry change on these where you can't do that.  

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, PureZ71 said:

Similar to Trail bosses, AT4 also recommends getting new UCA. I went with ReadyLift kit to level mine

 

ReadyLIFT 2" SST Kit

 

loamo1m.jpg

How long have you had it on? No issues I assume?

Ran into a friend of mine today who's in the mechanical program. Was talking about how I should have the ADAS system recalibrated after doing a level? I had planned on redoing the headlights, but hadn't thought about the cameras and other systems needing to be recalibrated. That's something I haven't seen anyone discuss on here...

PureZ71 Enthusiast

PureZ71

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Mstorm18 said:

How long have you had it on? No issues I assume?

Ran into a friend of mine today who's in the mechanical program. Was talking about how I should have the ADAS system recalibrated after doing a level? I had planned on redoing the headlights, but hadn't thought about the cameras and other systems needing to be recalibrated. That's something I haven't seen anyone discuss on here...

I've had it on for about two years now. Been great! even go off roading here and there.

 

My truck doesn't have any of that fancy cameras and stuff so I cant help you there. But I doubt that's an issue. I did lower the headlights a little since the kit brought the front end up (didn't want to blind people lol).

4banger Enthusiast

4banger

Posted
Posted
On 5/8/2023 at 2:48 PM, PureZ71 said:

Similar to Trail bosses, AT4 also recommends getting new UCA. I went with ReadyLift kit to level mine

 

ReadyLIFT 2" SST Kit

 

loamo1m.jpg

 

 

doesn't look level to me, bigger fender gap up front and the line under the windows is pointed uphill, looks like you just went and got a load of gravel already

 

these trucks look best with a bit of rake, and x2 on trailering or using it as a truck, I've come to realize the engineers and designers get a lot more right than we give em credit for

  • Like 3
Luc1f3r Enthusiast

Luc1f3r

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, 4banger said:

 

 

these trucks look best with a bit of rake, and x2 on trailering or using it as a truck, I've come to realize the engineers and designers get a lot more right than we give em credit for

We occasionally get things right...😆

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,764
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Tbhats2130
    Newest Member
    Tbhats2130
    Joined

  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,046 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • KARNUT
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By KARNUT · Posted

      Google converting 98 4.3 spider injection to carburetor if all else fails. 
    • Hoginedgewood
      MPG Surprise

      By Hoginedgewood · Posted

      That computer lies!
    • Tbhats2130
      2018 Silverado Console USB Port Not Working

      By Tbhats2130 · Posted

      My centre console USB ports haven’t been working and the one in the glovebox is starting to act up. When I plug my phone into the cord the radio will go black and stop playing, and the CarPlay is inconsistent.   I checked the fuses and they were fine. I changed the USB port out and still nothing. Hoping for some advice on what I should be looking at.  
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      The truck is a 1995 Chevrolet S10 Blazer, 4.3 VIN "W" engine. :cracks knuckles:   On a whim - because I needed a headache - this truck was for sale so I stopped to take a look. Doesn't run. Well, it does, but barely. Long crank, choppy idle, bad misfire(s), it REEKS of fuel. I can DO this..I'm thinking. Diamond in the rough. One owner until last year. A young guy is selling it, he bought it 6 months ago. It stranded him more than once, he's got a newborn. It was in the shop 10 days ago and he "thinks" they said it needs a new fuel injection system. He can't put any more money into it, needs it gone. I was thinking of upgrading my Macbook, which is a total want, not a need. For less than the price of a new laptop I can have fun for months tinkering on this truck and enjoying it. I'm taking this truck home. The guy was beyond thrilled, his wife was there, she thanked me profusely, I could tell they were hurting. They seemed like good people in a bind.   Some parts, a wash, maybe a set of tires, and I can have a few months of fun and then turn it for beer money (or the next project).   Sure enough, there's a work order from a shop last week in the INCHES of paperwork on this truck dating back to when the first owner bought it. They put a new distributor in it, fuel injection work describes basically opening the plenum and putting it back together. He said he couldn't afford any more work so he had them button it up and that's when he put it up for sale.   I'm not well versed in 4.3. I did discover 1995 uses the 1992-1995 SCPI "Spider" injector which is riddled with issues from splitting lines, clogged or cracked poppet valves and plastic spider legs that crumble over time. Cool. I'll just order me a ne---. Oh, the auto parts store doesn't have it? Rock Auto doesn't have it. eBay? $$$$$$ for used. These are UNAVAILABLE period end of story unless you know "a guy" who's still got one in a box somewhere.   Can't upgrade to the '96-'04 injector, it's a different plenum, wiring/pinout and sensor config.   There are a few kinda "know a guy" -guy rebuild services for these injectors out there for about $350. Okay, Okay... I'd like to know if anyone has used them? Anyone got a lead on these crappy 92-95 spiders?   I also don't want to send MY spider to Narnia and back without knowing if that's truly the problem. I guess I'll need to pull apart the plenum and do some digging.   I was also thrown for a loop. This 1995 model year truck has an OBD-II connector. The interface is decidedly not OBD-II. I can read and reset trouble codes and view live data, but there's not a lot of data. Like misfire count and on what cylinder, that's not there. It's OBD-1.5.   Nothing is ever easy. Now it makes sense why this guy wanted to disappear this thing for cheap. I'm guessing the shop told him the injector is toast, the part is unobtainable and they're not going to sort sending the thing to a rando offering rebuild service on craigslist, and the kid likely can't be without a working car for 3 weeks even if they'd facilitate that.   Experience with these early SCPI's? Stories? Things to check? Sympathy? (..Nah...)   This can sit until I sort it. But I haven't had a problem with a vehicle I couldn't easily solve in a long time.    
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I have four that read by the dash 8 to 10% better than miles/pump calculations and I have one that is spot on. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...