Jump to content

Proper way to level AT4?

SierraStorm21
 Share

Recommended Posts

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
Posted (edited)

2021 GMC Sierra AT4 and looking to level it the proper way. The truck came with 33's (275/60/20) and I'm looking at getting new slightly bigger tires too (34's (275/65/20's) and not sure if this would affect the way I should do it.

 

I've read through several threads talking about you should replace the UCA's in the process due to angles being outside the factory tolerance and I completely understand that and willing to spend the extra $ to do it right.

 

Reading through various reviews of the numerous kits out there, I think I've settled on the Rough Country one that includes the UCA's. I've never lifted or leveled a truck before, so I'm new to this and want to make sure I'm getting it right. So if you have experience or wisdom in this arena, feel free to chime and let me know if I should be doing something different.

Edited by Mstorm18
Had tire sizes reversed
Texanfisherman Enthusiast

Texanfisherman

Posted
Posted (edited)

The 275/65 will fit without a level kit. Possible that an extreme tread may rub a little, but it will fit. If you want to level on the cheap, I personally would not install anything more than a 1” without also replacing a-arms to correct geometry and improve the ball joint. Just my $.02. I have the silverado with the factory 2” and will do the BDS arms when I swap the tires. I will run a 295/65 with a 2” level and the BDS arms. 

Edited by Texanfisherman
SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Texanfisherman said:

You have your current and desired tire sizes reversed, but the 275/65 will fit without a level kit. Possible that an extreme tread may rub a little, but it will fit. If you want to level on the cheap, I personally would not install anything more than a 1” without also replacing a-arms to correct geometry and improve the ball joint. Just my $.02. I have the silverado with the factory 2” and will do the BDS arms when I swap the tires. I will run a 295/65 with a 2” level and the BDS arms. 

Good catch. Thanks! Edited

a-arms? The UCA's, right? The kit I linked has new ones that come with it, is that not right?

Edited by Mstorm18
Texanfisherman Enthusiast

Texanfisherman

Posted
Posted

Yes, a-arms/UCAs same thing. This is what I am banking on: https://www.jackit.com/bds-121260.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9deiBhC1ARIsAHLjR2AH8h5vX_coGf8m9IH8Lxcw94-iiPk3Z34gA3d21xnTpKfHIzrYd4QaAqlMEALw_wcB

 

Same setup they use in their 4 or 6 lifts. Just in case I want to go higher later. More expensive, but hard to find anyone dissatisfied with BDS and their quality. 

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think the more I read up on this, that perhaps the best thing to do is just have the front shocks swapped out for the 5100 Bilsteins, the ride adjustable ones to get a 1.1" lift. Seems doing so keeps things more within spec while still getting a slight lift in the front. While it may not be completely leveled, it's better than stock. 

  • Like 1
Luc1f3r Enthusiast

Luc1f3r

Posted
Posted

To everyone who levels their trucks, do you never carry heavy loads or tow? The factory Rake is meant to compensate for that.

 

Also stock height AT4 will fit 35x12 general grabbers with a slight rub on the mud flaps at full lock.

newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Mstorm18 said:

I think the more I read up on this, that perhaps the best thing to do is just have the front shocks swapped out for the 5100 Bilsteins, the ride adjustable ones to get a 1.1" lift. Seems doing so keeps things more within spec while still getting a slight lift in the front. While it may not be completely leveled, it's better than stock. 

 

 

I'd still get arms.  Non AT4s with a leveling kit will still fail the UCA.  We've had two come in now, one with significant damage to other components.  

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, newdude said:

 

 

I'd still get arms.  Non AT4s with a leveling kit will still fail the UCA.  We've had two come in now, one with significant damage to other components.  

 

Ugh, good to know. Any reason not to get the Bilstein version of those if I go with the upgraded shocks?

 

https://cart.bilsteinus.com/details?id=2972832273118789803&fyv=true&Year=1490468497551627837&Make=7109127503953767713&Model=2312292685622996290&Submodel=2928454506658859972&Pos=Front Upper&En=3896745598793439258

 

Or is another brand a better option? 

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 hours ago, Luc1f3r said:

To everyone who levels their trucks, do you never carry heavy loads or tow? The factory Rake is meant to compensate for that.

 

Also stock height AT4 will fit 35x12 general grabbers with a slight rub on the mud flaps at full lock.

I'm sure everyone knows that, but most that are going for that leveled look aren't towing or carrying heavy loads on a daily or even weekly basis. I surely don't and if I was, I'd just get air bags to compensate. It's all about the look.

 

I didn't want to go to 35's because I swapped out the factory flaps for the molded ones that hang down slightly lower to prevent rock throw from hitting the panels and that would require even more modifications. I think 34's are the best I'll get and I'm ok with that.

  • Like 1
newdude Senior Enthusiast

newdude

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Mstorm18 said:

 

Ugh, good to know. Any reason not to get the Bilstein version of those if I go with the upgraded shocks?

 

https://cart.bilsteinus.com/details?id=2972832273118789803&fyv=true&Year=1490468497551627837&Make=7109127503953767713&Model=2312292685622996290&Submodel=2928454506658859972&Pos=Front Upper&En=3896745598793439258

 

Or is another brand a better option? 

 

 

Can't speak on them really but from quick reading at that link, they appear to be engineered for use with a lift strut like theirs so would be a good move to pair them with their struts.  It does say not compatible with lift spacers which is interesting so I wonder if there is a clearance or geometry change on these where you can't do that.  

SierraStorm21 Enthusiast

SierraStorm21

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, PureZ71 said:

Similar to Trail bosses, AT4 also recommends getting new UCA. I went with ReadyLift kit to level mine

 

ReadyLIFT 2" SST Kit

 

loamo1m.jpg

How long have you had it on? No issues I assume?

Ran into a friend of mine today who's in the mechanical program. Was talking about how I should have the ADAS system recalibrated after doing a level? I had planned on redoing the headlights, but hadn't thought about the cameras and other systems needing to be recalibrated. That's something I haven't seen anyone discuss on here...

PureZ71 Enthusiast

PureZ71

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Mstorm18 said:

How long have you had it on? No issues I assume?

Ran into a friend of mine today who's in the mechanical program. Was talking about how I should have the ADAS system recalibrated after doing a level? I had planned on redoing the headlights, but hadn't thought about the cameras and other systems needing to be recalibrated. That's something I haven't seen anyone discuss on here...

I've had it on for about two years now. Been great! even go off roading here and there.

 

My truck doesn't have any of that fancy cameras and stuff so I cant help you there. But I doubt that's an issue. I did lower the headlights a little since the kit brought the front end up (didn't want to blind people lol).

4banger Enthusiast

4banger

Posted
Posted
On 5/8/2023 at 2:48 PM, PureZ71 said:

Similar to Trail bosses, AT4 also recommends getting new UCA. I went with ReadyLift kit to level mine

 

ReadyLIFT 2" SST Kit

 

loamo1m.jpg

 

 

doesn't look level to me, bigger fender gap up front and the line under the windows is pointed uphill, looks like you just went and got a load of gravel already

 

these trucks look best with a bit of rake, and x2 on trailering or using it as a truck, I've come to realize the engineers and designers get a lot more right than we give em credit for

  • Like 3
Luc1f3r Enthusiast

Luc1f3r

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, 4banger said:

 

 

these trucks look best with a bit of rake, and x2 on trailering or using it as a truck, I've come to realize the engineers and designers get a lot more right than we give em credit for

We occasionally get things right...😆

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 405 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • davester
      2015 Silverado 3500 right rear turn indicator failure

      By davester · Posted

      consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • davester
      My First Project and GMC has me stumped

      By davester · Posted

      can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • Chuck FB
      Tire pressure for 37s

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Snowcamo
      Possible lifter tick after DOD delete

      By Snowcamo · Posted

      Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...