Jump to content

2020 silverado LT manual to power upgrade

Black-5.3
 Share

Recommended Posts

Black-5.3 New Member

Black-5.3

Posted
Posted

So I have a 2019 silverado LT new body style with heated seats my drivers is power but passenger manual. I found a set of 2020 gmc sierra power heated and ventilated seats front and rear to upgrade to. I assume they are bolt on but will they be plug and play for both driver and passenger. I am not too worried about lift and lumbar on the passenger seat only back and forth and that the heated seat works. Please let me know if you’ve done the upgrade and what would happen if I just plug them right in or if they even would plug together.  Thank you 

roccod787 New Member

roccod787

Posted
Posted

I'm going through the same thing as you did. 2020 Sierra Elevation. Stock cloth/manual seats. Upgraded to power heated leather in the front. The power works fine, but the heat does not (even installed the OEM dash buttons on the HVAC control). I also verified my truck as the factory wiring and fuses for heat. Nobody will help reprogram the BCM to allow it to communicate with the seat heater control module. So, the power will work in your passenger seat, but the cooling will probably not, and the rear heated seats will also probably not work. Let me know if you find a way to get it to work, or a dealership to help reprogram. I've called at least 6 GMC/Chevy dealer who all tell me it can't be done. 

Black-5.3 New Member

Black-5.3

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Ok thanks I didnt think the hvac would work which is fine. Did you have heated seats from the factory and they didn’t work on the new seats when you plugged them in? I am only worried now that the heated seats wouldn’t work on the driver and passenger when I plug my new seats in 

  • 1 month later...
Sanramir Enthusiast

Sanramir

Posted
Posted

Going to keep a tab on this, I'm going thru this as well on my Silverado baby diesel.

Equipped with cloth seats with heat and only power on the driver side and manual on the passenger side.

 

I swapped out the rear bench seat to the leather ones i found, they came with a harness that my truck didn't come equipped with (heated option i'm assuming), just ziptied it outta the way.

 

Put in both the passenger and driver seats and didn't get power to either one.  I already didn't have power on the passenger so i figured I'd need to pigtail power from the driver to the passenger.  But the drivers side didn't work either even though i already had power option originally.  Kinda stumped, I'll keep looking for a solution.

Rally6.2RST Enthusiast

Rally6.2RST

Posted
Posted
On 5/9/2023 at 11:14 PM, roccod787 said:

I'm going through the same thing as you did. 2020 Sierra Elevation. Stock cloth/manual seats. Upgraded to power heated leather in the front. The power works fine, but the heat does not (even installed the OEM dash buttons on the HVAC control). I also verified my truck as the factory wiring and fuses for heat. Nobody will help reprogram the BCM to allow it to communicate with the seat heater control module. So, the power will work in your passenger seat, but the cooling will probably not, and the rear heated seats will also probably not work. Let me know if you find a way to get it to work, or a dealership to help reprogram. I've called at least 6 GMC/Chevy dealer who all tell me it can't be done. 

You need WAMS White Automotive and Media Services.  I added factory heated rear seats and added cool seats to my heated with programming with WAMS+ autosync.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined

  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,646 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • revmanii
      Looking at ordering a '26 WT because I want a std cab, std bed

      By revmanii · Posted

      Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...