Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

wondering if I should change anything (sensor or solenoid) prior to tearing into the turbo. I am aware of the problem just wondering if there is a solution other than the obvious? 

its a big job and big dollars to fix/clean the turbo. Truck is also not deleted so make it even harder getting to the turbo and and costly to replace gaskets and what not. maybe time to delete at this point?

Any harm in driving it as is? it seems like the DEF regen is cycling VERY often every three to four days and takes a long LONG time to clean itself out. I believe the turbo is getting stuck intermittently 

JP

Edited by papy
typo
  • papy changed the title to 2011 LML p003a code
Posted

DTC P003A

Turbocharger Vane Position Not Learned

 

Circuit/System Testing

Inspect the Q41 turbocharger vane position control solenoid valve and B112 turbocharger vane position sensor for damage or sticking.

 

If a condition is found, test or replace the affected component as necessary.

Inspect the turbocharger for debris, damage or sticking vanes. Refer to Turbocharger Cleaning and Inspection.

If a condition is found, clean or replace the turbocharger as necessary.

 

Component Testing

Turbocharger Vane Position Control Solenoid Valve

Ignition OFF, disconnect the harness connector at the Q41 Turbocharger Vane Position Control Solenoid Valve.

Measure the resistance across the Q41 Turbocharger Vane Position Control Solenoid Valve terminals. The resistance should be between 3–7 Ω.

If greater than the specified range, replace the Q41 Turbocharger Vane Position Control Solenoid Valve.

Test for infinite resistance between each Q41 Turbocharger Vane Position Control Solenoid Valve terminal and the solenoid valve housing.

If less than the specified range, replace the Q41 Turbocharger Vane Position Control Solenoid Valve.

 

Turbocharger Vane Position Sensor

Note: It is normal for the TC Vane Position Sensor voltage to quickly return to approximately 4.9 V as the plunger reaches its fully depressed position.

Remove the B112 Turbocharger Vane Position Sensor.

Connect the B112 Turbocharger Vane Position Sensor harness connector.

Ignition ON, observe the scan tool TC Vane Position Sensor voltage while slowly depressing the plunger at the end of the B112 Turbocharger Vane Position Sensor. The voltage should decrease smoothly from approximately 4.9–0.2 V.

If the TC Vane Position Sensor parameter drops out or spikes, replace the B112 Turbocharger Vane Position Sensor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way to big should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crosing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
    • And overpriced. I was in the Oshawa Truck Plant when they were being built. Very few. I could count on one hand how many I've seen since  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...