Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have this: https://a.co/d/8LKnoOC

 

I have been using it mostly with TrackAddict on my phone but I also have inCarDoc and Torque (Lite). TrackAddict is the app I've used the most as it seems to give me access the most easily to the largest chunk of data.

 

I ran into an issue with my wife's car this week and the tool/apps fell kind of flat in terms of data for me and I'm wondering if the limitations are from the tool, the apps, or both.

 

Specifically, I was looking for access to things like the oil pressure readings (her car has multiple pressure switches, one of which had failed - I figured that part out from the DTC, but was interested in seeing what the reported pressures were after replacement) and none of the apps seemed to show that sort of stuff. I'm now wondering if there's another app I should be considering for use with this tool or if a better scan tool is required for more data point access. It shares info via WiFi, so any app (laptop, phone) would need to support the use of WiFi-enabled scan tools.

Posted

This is the one I carry in my backpack. I have a snapon triton D10 that I own if I need to go further. For heavy duty off road and on road I own diesel laptop ( texa) and use a Bluetooth with my app from diesel laptop called diesel decoder. 

IMG_0779.png

IMG_0778.png

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Do the ODB2 protocols/standards change such that an older tool might not work in a newer vehicle? Tried hooking mine up to my truck today and got a "Link Error" each time.

Posted
51 minutes ago, TrueBlue said:

Do the ODB2 protocols/standards change such that an older tool might not work in a newer vehicle? Tried hooking mine up to my truck today and got a "Link Error" each time.

 

I believe that the general protocol should be the same across all OBD-II systems. It's possible that your scan device might need updating to correctly understand certain codes, but it should be able to at least connect. How old is the tool? Is it possible that it's damaged in some way?

Posted

It's got to be close to 10 years old. I've never had an issue with it on any of the other cars I've connected it to. Just my truck. But, prior to this the only vehicles I used it on were very late 90's and very early 2000's. It is not an expensive model, likely made across the big water.

Posted
1 hour ago, TrueBlue said:

It's got to be close to 10 years old. I've never had an issue with it on any of the other cars I've connected it to. Just my truck. But, prior to this the only vehicles I used it on were very late 90's and very early 2000's. It is not an expensive model, likely made across the big water.

 

Could it be OBD-I? OBD-II wasn't introduced until 1996 and OBD-I was still present in vehicles up until 2006.

Posted
1 hour ago, ember1205 said:

 

Could it be OBD-I? OBD-II wasn't introduced until 1996 and OBD-I was still present in vehicles up until 2006.

OBD-1 won't fit OBD-2 and vise versa.

Posted (edited)

No, it's definitely an OBD2 Tool

 

Now, because I've never before plugged it into any of my newer, push-button cars I'm not entirely sure I did it correctly. I plugged the tool in, waited for it to show me the Can display, pushed the start button without touching the brake, pressed enter on the tool, and then waited while it cycled through all the protocols shown in the booklet. After that it said Connection Error, or somesuch.

Edited by TrueBlue
Posted

When vehicles went to CANBUS communication, the older tools won't read CAN data. The ELM style adapter the original poster showed was known to have issues when it first came out ages ago. It was a knock off of a good working product with corners cut. I can't remember what my current Bluetooth OBDII brand is. I have the older ELM knockoff as well somewhere. I'm considering a TOPDON Bluetooth adapter as it is a bi-directional unit and is only about $60.

Posted
9 hours ago, gemarsh said:

OBD-1 won't fit OBD-2 and vise versa.

 

I didn't think so, but wasn't sure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,492 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...