Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I have a 2017 Silverado 1500 V6 4.3. My transmission temperature gets very high at times even driving 10 to 20 minutes. I installed the superior solutions bypass valve but nothing has changed temperature wise. Then doing some research I realize that a lot of people are saying that the 4.3 won’t help with the superior solutions because it does not have an aux trans cooler. My first question is that correct? And my second is what else can I do to lower the temp?

Posted

I believe you are correct, there isn't a factory cooler like the V8 trucks.

 

You can install an aftermarket cooler to help with temps. But if only 10-20 min worth of driving is getting the transmission hot, you may have other issues. But you also didn't say how hot it is getting either.

Posted
1 hour ago, Noah H9 said:

So I have a 2017 Silverado 1500 V6 4.3. My transmission temperature gets very high at times even driving 10 to 20 minutes. I installed the superior solutions bypass valve but nothing has changed temperature wise. Then doing some research I realize that a lot of people are saying that the 4.3 won’t help with the superior solutions because it does not have an aux trans cooler. My first question is that correct? And my second is what else can I do to lower the temp?

 

 

 

How high we talking?  Over 195-205F?  

Posted

Yes, if I drive for a good 45 mins we will be in the 200 range. 
as of right now, I don’t see it settle until it gets up to that range, it just continues to get hotter and doesn’t just rest.

Posted

Yes, if I drive for a good 45 mins we will be in the 200 range. 
as of right now, I don’t see it settle until it gets up to that range, it just continues to get hotter and doesn’t just rest. Sometimes if I drive 15 mins it will be around 145 but like I said it just continues to climb.


Almost like the radiator isn’t cooling it off?

Posted (edited)

Technically seeing 200 degrees isn't an issue as the fluid can more than handle that temp but the fluid life is reduced.

 

It's always going to continue to climb if you don't have a real transmission cooler installed. Install an aftermarket cooler and the temps will stop going as high.

 

And you are right, the radiator won't cool it off because the coolant is staying at 200 degrees.

Edited by CamGTP
Posted

 

 

The V6 transmission cooler is in the cold tank which will run 25 to 35 degrees cooler than the thermostat temperature. Factory water thermostat is 207 F so the cold side will run something like 175-ish.  Transmisson fluid cooler inside the cold tank is a 6 or 7-plate stacked plate exchanger that runs 'counter current' to the fluid which means it will get within a few degrees of the cold side tank temperature. I'm guessing you live somewhere that is currently quite hot as on a cold Midwest day here it takes a very long time to reach operating temperature. If fact in the current subzero conditions, it won't. 

 

In town it may run a bit warmer or on a very hot day or with a big load or running very fast. Don't know where you are or how you drive so I'm guessing a bit.

 

Check the simple stuff first. Kinked lines. Plugged cooler. Is the water temperature 'normal'. Fluid level. Fluid condition. Stuff like that. If it all checks out good, then this like will buy you about 25-30 degrees. It requires no programing and is drop in and as reliable as the factory unit. 

 

Katech 174 Degree Gen 5 LT Thermostat (katechengines.com)

 

I run a similar setup in my 2015 V6 with very good results on any day under 100 F. Fact is, the ATF never gets hotter than 145F on any day under 75F. Cheaper and easier than a cooler. Which can also be added down the road. I'll be adding more this spring. We have plenty of days over 75F. 😉 

 

You have more than 40K on that fluid? Change it. 

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

 

The V6 transmission cooler is in the cold tank which will run 25 to 35 degrees cooler than the thermostat temperature. Factory water thermostat is 207 F so the cold side will run something like 175-ish.  Transmisson fluid cooler inside the cold tank is a 6 or 7-plate stacked plate exchanger that runs 'counter current' to the fluid which means it will get within a few degrees of the cold side tank temperature. I'm guessing you live somewhere that is currently quite hot as on a cold Midwest day here it takes a very long time to reach operating temperature. If fact in the current subzero conditions, it won't. 

 

In town it may run a bit warmer or on a very hot day or with a big load or running very fast. Don't know where you are or how you drive so I'm guessing a bit.

 

Check the simple stuff first. Kinked lines. Plugged cooler. Is the water temperature 'normal'. Fluid level. Fluid condition. Stuff like that. If it all checks out good, then this like will buy you about 25-30 degrees. It requires no programing and is drop in and as reliable as the factory unit. 

 

Katech 174 Degree Gen 5 LT Thermostat (katechengines.com)

 

I run a similar setup in my 2015 V6 with very good results on any day under 100 F. Fact is, the ATF never gets hotter than 145F on any day under 75F. Cheaper and easier than a cooler. Which can also be added down the road. I'll be adding more this spring. We have plenty of days over 75F. 😉 

 

You have more than 40K on that fluid? Change it. 

 

 

 

 

Thanks so much. So the link you sent me I don’t think will fit my truck. I have a 4.3L and it doesn’t show that the thermostat will fit that? Do you know of any other ones that will fit my truck?

Posted
51 minutes ago, Noah H9 said:

Thanks so much. So the link you sent me I don’t think will fit my truck. I have a 4.3L and it doesn’t show that the thermostat will fit that? Do you know of any other ones that will fit my truck?

 

It fits. 

Posted

Thanks to Grumpy and others, I got my 2015 v6 work truck sorted out.

 

If by some chance they are out of stock and you can't wait, you might consider this as an alternative: Mishimoto MMTS-VET-180 Racing 180 Thermostat fits Chevrolet  So far it has proved itself to be of value.

Posted
1 hour ago, Ubiquity said:

Thanks to Grumpy and others, I got my 2015 v6 work truck sorted out.

 

If by some chance they are out of stock and you can't wait, you might consider this as an alternative: Mishimoto MMTS-VET-180 Racing 180 Thermostat fits Chevrolet  So far it has proved itself to be of value.

Side question.  I recently installed the superior solution bypass valve but it’s not keeping the temp down as I would like. After installing the new thermostat like you said should I replace the bypass with the original part and return the superior solution one?

Posted (edited)

Noah H9:  I also first did the SURE COOL SYSTEM SUPERIOR STL010; then I followed it up by converting to the lower temperature thermostat.  I had not even considered returning it to the original setup. 

 

I haven't towed much with my truck, so I can't say how it would keep up with shedding the excess heat.  If I were to tow on a regular basis, that is, anything of considerable weight, I think I would be adding an additional aux radiator.  But as it stands now I'll cross that bridge when and if that time comes. 

 

 

I also plan on changing my transmission fluid on a tighter schedule.  I currently have a total 65k easy miles on the truck; and if I recall correctly, its about 1k miles since I changed the fluid/filter and did the bypass valve.   

Edited by Ubiquity
My English teacher said I should try it again.
  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

 

The V6 transmission cooler is in the cold tank which will run 25 to 35 degrees cooler than the thermostat temperature. Factory water thermostat is 207 F so the cold side will run something like 175-ish.  Transmisson fluid cooler inside the cold tank is a 6 or 7-plate stacked plate exchanger that runs 'counter current' to the fluid which means it will get within a few degrees of the cold side tank temperature. I'm guessing you live somewhere that is currently quite hot as on a cold Midwest day here it takes a very long time to reach operating temperature. If fact in the current subzero conditions, it won't. 

 

In town it may run a bit warmer or on a very hot day or with a big load or running very fast. Don't know where you are or how you drive so I'm guessing a bit.

 

Check the simple stuff first. Kinked lines. Plugged cooler. Is the water temperature 'normal'. Fluid level. Fluid condition. Stuff like that. If it all checks out good, then this like will buy you about 25-30 degrees. It requires no programing and is drop in and as reliable as the factory unit. 

 

Katech 174 Degree Gen 5 LT Thermostat (katechengines.com)

 

I run a similar setup in my 2015 V6 with very good results on any day under 100 F. Fact is, the ATF never gets hotter than 145F on any day under 75F. Cheaper and easier than a cooler. Which can also be added down the road. I'll be adding more this spring. We have plenty of days over 75F. 😉 

 

You have more than 40K on that fluid? Change it. 

 

 

 

 

Side question.  I recently installed the superior solution bypass valve but it’s not keeping the temp down as I would like. After installing the new thermostat like you said should I replace the bypass with the original part and return the superior solution one?

Posted
59 minutes ago, Ubiquity said:

Noah H9:  I also first did the SURE COOL SYSTEM SUPERIOR STL010; then I followed it up by converting to the lower temperature thermostat.  I had not even considered returning it to the original setup. 

 

I haven't towed much with my truck, so I can't say how it would keep up with shedding the excess heat.  If I were to tow on a regular basis, that is, anything of considerable weight, I think I would be adding an additional aux radiator.  But as it stands now I'll cross that bridge when and if that time comes. 

 

 

I also plan on changing my transmission fluid on a tighter schedule.  I currently have a total 65k easy miles on the truck; and if I recall correctly, its about 1k miles since I changed the fluid/filter and did the bypass valve.   

What’s your trans temp at now? Better?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,875 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...