Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hey all.  I know there's a ton of info out there about leveling kits for T1 trucks, but when I was researching for my truck I didn't seem to find much info on some of the options and combinations I was considering so hopefully this might help someone else in the future.  

 

* TL;DR at the bottom of the post.

 

Here's my rig in stock trim.  2022 Limited GMC AT4.  This spot isn't exactly level, but it's close enough that it doesn't register on the truck's angle sensor.  I suck at taking pics, but I wanted to show the changes from the different steps of this process.  Story time.

 

Stock1.thumb.jpeg.e5cd32f637cb46abb93a1f6c5f7c235d.jpeg

 

Stock2.thumb.jpeg.77a3517b6930e4b29ab03e7e1e7ed6dc.jpeg

 

I've had a 4WD GMC or Chevrolet truck (usually in Z71 trim) from each generation starting with my 1993 and they seem to be getting better with each generation.  I love my 22 Limited AT4, but couldn't stand the Rancho shocks.  Especially when towing.  All the trucks I had before my most recent 2017 had OEM Bilstein shocks, and to me that's the feel I expect for a GM truck.  I had a set of Bilstein 5100s on my 2017 Z71 which provided enough front end lift to run the tires I wanted along with handling improvements, so I knew I wanted to go that route again.  In retrospect I should have looked closer at the 6112s for the front, however I'm not 100% confident I wouldn't have been in the same boat as my 5100s didn't actually provide the advertised increase in ride height (more on that later) and given they include springs it would have been more difficult to find something to pair.  The stock tires also left a lot to be desired.  At 25k miles they were already unreasonably loud to the point passengers would complain and they stopped balancing properly at about 20k miles.  After a year with this truck I was ready for new shocks and tires.

 

I enjoy SCCA RallyX and tow my RallyX car / gear for race weekends. The plan was not to level the truck as I wanted to keep some rake to help with towing.  Since a true 33" tire wasn't available in the tire I wanted to run, I decided on a 295/70/18 or a touch over 34".  I had seen some guys running similar sized tires with not much lift, so I thought I had a good shot to get by with a set of Bilstein 5100s.  I also snagged a set of the Bilstein B8 upper control arms to give the best shot at keeping a decent ride and OE alignment specs. 

 

First step was the Bilstein 5100s and UCAs with the stock tires.  The 5100 series claims +1.1" of ride height in the front.  Unfortunately I only gained 7/8" (FL) and 15/16" (FR), but it was close enough.  The rears saw negligible height increase.  

 

* Side note:  previous 5100 sets ran on other trucks provided 4 different height adjustment levels, where as the current set of 5100s only have 3 (stock, + 0.5", and +1.1").  I really like the Bilsteins, but it would have been nice to get the advertised lift, and have a setting in between the 2 lift settings like previous generations which would have been perfect for me.  I was also bummed about the height difference from side to side as the truck sat perfectly level prior to the change in struts, but these are small gripes.

 

Bilstein 5100s + B8 UCA on stock tire.

 

5100sB8stocktire1.thumb.jpeg.e8e930e8b2079cc1887ceaef040f48b8.jpeg

 

5100sB8stocktire2.thumb.jpeg.6b4ede7aaa247c8fe44e0851ece3e24c.jpeg

 

The Bilsteins added a noticeable amount of lift in the front along with ride and handling improvements that were immediately noticeable.  They are worth the change even if you're not wanting to add any height IMO.  Stock tires had to go.  I've tried a few different options over the years and have had the best luck with the BFG A/T KO2.  They didn't have the size I wanted, but the 295/70/18s were close.  If nothing else it was nice to have a tire that balanced and wasn't distractingly loud.  It was close, but they did rub a touch.  It was only at full right lock in reverse, and when hitting some large bumps at speed, but I don't tolerate rubbing tires.  

 

Bilstein 5100s + B8 UCA on BFG 295/70/18 tires.

 

5100sB8BFG295tire1.thumb.jpeg.a9ba57001970fd3c079e8994374bd5dc.jpeg

 

5100sB8BFG295tire2.thumb.jpeg.8ef101592fac5be67188c062ce364c85.jpeg

 

In spite of the few instances of rubbing and slightly heavier tire, I really liked the strut / shock and tire changes.  The tires added approximately 1 inch of overall height.  The goal was to keep some rake while eliminating rubbing.  I wasn't sure what I could pair with the 5100s to hit the sweet spot while staying within spec in the front, and unfortunately I didn't see many options in the 1/2 to 1 inch lift range. It seemed like most of the level kits above 1 3/4" used a combination of upper and lower spacers, so I thought that the added length of the front struts might be a possible substitute for the lower spacer.  The idea being the 5100s might allow for the simple addition of an upper spacer to replicate other leveling kits.

 

Here's the final product.

 

Bilstein 5100s + B8 UCA + Ready Lift 1.5" upper spacers on BFG 295/70/18 tires.

 

5100sB8RL1.5BFG295tire1.thumb.jpeg.aebcaf0603e093050e7ec7f282128135.jpeg

 

5100sB8RL1.5BFG295tire2.thumb.jpeg.b29d58e7e4853a7aa13b9c507a7b5b68.jpeg

 

5100sB8RL1.5BFG295tire3.thumb.jpeg.754190b815df6773cb232a0bb5876943.jpeg

 

5100sB8RL1.5BFG295tire4.thumb.jpeg.0c5657722a874261ae411e39a5924d8e.jpeg

 

Driving Impressions:  As stated previously, handling and overall ride are significantly improved.  I had a few weeks to drive the truck with the Bilsteins and stock tires to judge how they affected things.  The added height in the front from the spacers either didn't have a significant effect and/or is negated by the Bilsteins.  The only noticeable difference in the tires on the road are that the new tires balance properly and are quiet.  I've had plenty of experience with these tires to know what to expect.  I would have liked to try out the KO3, but they're not really available at the moment.  

 

Suspension Height differences:  While the truck sat level from side to side originally, there is around 1/8" of difference from the right to the left now.  Due to the difference, the figures I post are the average of the right and left.  All measurements were from the ground to the bottom of the fender directly above the center of the wheel.  Measurements were taken before and after the tire change which resulted in an increase of overall height by approximately 1 1/8" over the stock tire.  I have the exact measurements on all 4 corners at each stage and have subtracted the increase due to tires.  The final product sits nearly level depending on level ground.  I'm hoping for a touch of settle.  

 

- Front:

   - Bilstein 5100 struts set @ 1.1" lift:  + avg 0.9" (29/32") over stock.

   - 5100s @ 1.1" + Ready Lift 1.5" upper spacer:  + avg 2.15" (2 5/32") over stock.

   - Suspension mods + BFG 34" tires:  + avg 3.375" (3 3/8") over stock.

 

- Rear height was increased by 1.125" (1 1/8") over stock attributed mostly to tires.

The current plan is to allow everything to settle over the next couple of weeks and re-measure when I retorque bolts and check the alignment.  I would like to and am considering dropping the 5100s to the middle setting (+ 0.5" lift).  If I do this and there is no rubbing I will update this thread in the future.  There's probably much better ways to go about this, but so far so good.  Hope there is some useful tidbits for someone down the line.  If you got this far, thanks for reading.  

 

TL;DR - Approximately replicated other leveling kits that include top and bottom spacers + UCAs with Bilstein 5100s, B8 upper control arms, and Ready Lift 1.5" spacers.  Results is an average of 2.15" of front lift allow 295/70/18 BFG KO2 tires (approx 34.3" dia) to be ran w/o rubbing.  Truck aligns to factory specs, better handling, better overall ride, negligible increase in CV angle, and nothing in front end required significant tension to install.  

 

Edited by DrNick
  • DrNick changed the title to Non Standard AT4 Level - Bilstein + ReadyLift + 34s (w/pics)
Posted
On 3/5/2024 at 6:36 PM, DrNick said:

Hey all.  I know there's a ton of info out there about leveling kits for T1 trucks, but when I was researching for my truck I didn't seem to find much info on some of the options and combinations I was considering so hopefully this might help someone else in the future.  

 

* TL;DR at the bottom of the post.

 

Here's my rig in stock trim.  2022 Limited GMC AT4.  This spot isn't exactly level, but it's close enough that it doesn't register on the truck's angle sensor.  I suck at taking pics, but I wanted to show the changes from the different steps of this process.  Story time.

 

Stock1.thumb.jpeg.e5cd32f637cb46abb93a1f6c5f7c235d.jpeg

 

Stock2.thumb.jpeg.77a3517b6930e4b29ab03e7e1e7ed6dc.jpeg

 

I've had a 4WD GMC or Chevrolet truck (usually in Z71 trim) from each generation starting with my 1993 and they seem to be getting better with each generation.  I love my 22 Limited AT4, but couldn't stand the Rancho shocks.  Especially when towing.  All the trucks I had before my most recent 2017 had OEM Bilstein shocks, and to me that's the feel I expect for a GM truck.  I had a set of Bilstein 5100s on my 2017 Z71 which provided enough front end lift to run the tires I wanted along with handling improvements, so I knew I wanted to go that route again.  In retrospect I should have looked closer at the 6112s for the front, however I'm not 100% confident I wouldn't have been in the same boat as my 5100s didn't actually provide the advertised increase in ride height (more on that later) and given they include springs it would have been more difficult to find something to pair.  The stock tires also left a lot to be desired.  At 25k miles they were already unreasonably loud to the point passengers would complain and they stopped balancing properly at about 20k miles.  After a year with this truck I was ready for new shocks and tires.

 

I enjoy SCCA RallyX and tow my RallyX car / gear for race weekends. The plan was not to level the truck as I wanted to keep some rake to help with towing.  Since a true 33" tire wasn't available in the tire I wanted to run, I decided on a 295/70/18 or a touch over 34".  I had seen some guys running similar sized tires with not much lift, so I thought I had a good shot to get by with a set of Bilstein 5100s.  I also snagged a set of the Bilstein B8 upper control arms to give the best shot at keeping a decent ride and OE alignment specs. 

 

First step was the Bilstein 5100s and UCAs with the stock tires.  The 5100 series claims +1.1" of ride height in the front.  Unfortunately I only gained 7/8" (FL) and 15/16" (FR), but it was close enough.  The rears saw negligible height increase.  

 

* Side note:  previous 5100 sets ran on other trucks provided 4 different height adjustment levels, where as the current set of 5100s only have 3 (stock, + 0.5", and +1.1").  I really like the Bilsteins, but it would have been nice to get the advertised lift, and have a setting in between the 2 lift settings like previous generations which would have been perfect for me.  I was also bummed about the height difference from side to side as the truck sat perfectly level prior to the change in struts, but these are small gripes.

 

Bilstein 5100s + B8 UCA on stock tire.

 

5100sB8stocktire1.thumb.jpeg.e8e930e8b2079cc1887ceaef040f48b8.jpeg

 

5100sB8stocktire2.thumb.jpeg.6b4ede7aaa247c8fe44e0851ece3e24c.jpeg

 

The Bilsteins added a noticeable amount of lift in the front along with ride and handling improvements that were immediately noticeable.  They are worth the change even if you're not wanting to add any height IMO.  Stock tires had to go.  I've tried a few different options over the years and have had the best luck with the BFG A/T KO2.  They didn't have the size I wanted, but the 295/70/18s were close.  If nothing else it was nice to have a tire that balanced and wasn't distractingly loud.  It was close, but they did rub a touch.  It was only at full right lock in reverse, and when hitting some large bumps at speed, but I don't tolerate rubbing tires.  

 

Bilstein 5100s + B8 UCA on BFG 295/70/18 tires.

 

5100sB8BFG295tire1.thumb.jpeg.a9ba57001970fd3c079e8994374bd5dc.jpeg

 

5100sB8BFG295tire2.thumb.jpeg.8ef101592fac5be67188c062ce364c85.jpeg

 

In spite of the few instances of rubbing and slightly heavier tire, I really liked the strut / shock and tire changes.  The tires added approximately 1 inch of overall height.  The goal was to keep some rake while eliminating rubbing.  I wasn't sure what I could pair with the 5100s to hit the sweet spot while staying within spec in the front, and unfortunately I didn't see many options in the 1/2 to 1 inch lift range. It seemed like most of the level kits above 1 3/4" used a combination of upper and lower spacers, so I thought that the added length of the front struts might be a possible substitute for the lower spacer.  The idea being the 5100s might allow for the simple addition of an upper spacer to replicate other leveling kits.

 

Here's the final product.

 

Bilstein 5100s + B8 UCA + Ready Lift 1.5" upper spacers on BFG 295/70/18 tires.

 

5100sB8RL1.5BFG295tire1.thumb.jpeg.aebcaf0603e093050e7ec7f282128135.jpeg

 

5100sB8RL1.5BFG295tire2.thumb.jpeg.b29d58e7e4853a7aa13b9c507a7b5b68.jpeg

 

5100sB8RL1.5BFG295tire3.thumb.jpeg.754190b815df6773cb232a0bb5876943.jpeg

 

5100sB8RL1.5BFG295tire4.thumb.jpeg.0c5657722a874261ae411e39a5924d8e.jpeg

 

Driving Impressions:  As stated previously, handling and overall ride are significantly improved.  I had a few weeks to drive the truck with the Bilsteins and stock tires to judge how they affected things.  The added height in the front from the spacers either didn't have a significant effect and/or is negated by the Bilsteins.  The only noticeable difference in the tires on the road are that the new tires balance properly and are quiet.  I've had plenty of experience with these tires to know what to expect.  I would have liked to try out the KO3, but they're not really available at the moment.  

 

Suspension Height differences:  While the truck sat level from side to side originally, there is around 1/8" of difference from the right to the left now.  Due to the difference, the figures I post are the average of the right and left.  All measurements were from the ground to the bottom of the fender directly above the center of the wheel.  Measurements were taken before and after the tire change which resulted in an increase of overall height by approximately 1 1/8" over the stock tire.  I have the exact measurements on all 4 corners at each stage and have subtracted the increase due to tires.  The final product sits nearly level depending on level ground.  I'm hoping for a touch of settle.  

 

- Front:

   - Bilstein 5100 struts set @ 1.1" lift:  + avg 0.9" (29/32") over stock.

   - 5100s @ 1.1" + Ready Lift 1.5" upper spacer:  + avg 2.15" (2 5/32") over stock.

   - Suspension mods + BFG 34" tires:  + avg 3.375" (3 3/8") over stock.

 

- Rear height was increased by 1.125" (1 1/8") over stock attributed mostly to tires.

The current plan is to allow everything to settle over the next couple of weeks and re-measure when I retorque bolts and check the alignment.  I would like to and am considering dropping the 5100s to the middle setting (+ 0.5" lift).  If I do this and there is no rubbing I will update this thread in the future.  There's probably much better ways to go about this, but so far so good.  Hope there is some useful tidbits for someone down the line.  If you got this far, thanks for reading.  

 

TL;DR - Approximately replicated other leveling kits that include top and bottom spacers + UCAs with Bilstein 5100s, B8 upper control arms, and Ready Lift 1.5" spacers.  Results is an average of 2.15" of front lift allow 295/70/18 BFG KO2 tires (approx 34.3" dia) to be ran w/o rubbing.  Truck aligns to factory specs, better handling, better overall ride, negligible increase in CV angle, and nothing in front end required significant tension to install.  

 

 

Looking good!

Posted

Great write up. I just got my AT4 back from the shop today from having the the Bilstein 5100 set all the way around done. Did the 1.1" setting in the front as well. I'm still on stock 33's (275/60/20) and I seem to have lost my measurements that I took a few weeks ago prior to this. I've only driven maybe 8 miles since getting it back and I'm 39" in the front and 40.6" in the rear to the bottom of the wheel well. Overall it looks significantly better. As for ride, hard to tell yet.

 

Once it settles in I'll do another set of measurements. Need to adjust the headlights to compensate and I'll take some pictures tomorrow on level ground too.

  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 3/5/2024 at 4:36 PM, DrNick said:

- Front:

   - Bilstein 5100 struts set @ 1.1" lift:  + avg 0.9" (29/32") over stock.

   - 5100s @ 1.1" + Ready Lift 1.5" upper spacer:  + avg 2.15" (2 5/32") over stock.

   - Suspension mods + BFG 34" tires:  + avg 3.375" (3 3/8") over stock.

 

- Rear height was increased by 1.125" (1 1/8") over stock attributed mostly to tires.

The current plan is to allow everything to settle over the next couple of weeks and re-measure when I retorque bolts and check the alignment.  I would like to and am considering dropping the 5100s to the middle setting (+ 0.5" lift).  If I do this and there is no rubbing I will update this thread in the future.  There's probably much better ways to go about this, but so far so good.  Hope there is some useful tidbits for someone down the line.  If you got this far, thanks for reading.  

 

TL;DR - Approximately replicated other leveling kits that include top and bottom spacers + UCAs with Bilstein 5100s, B8 upper control arms, and Ready Lift 1.5" spacers.  Results is an average of 2.15" of front lift allow 295/70/18 BFG KO2 tires (approx 34.3" dia) to be ran w/o rubbing.  Truck aligns to factory specs, better handling, better overall ride, negligible increase in CV angle, and nothing in front end required significant tension to install.  

 

 

Do you remember what the stock ride height difference was originally? I ask because I've done the Bilstein 5100's all the way around, position 3, like you have and the difference is 2" between front and back. With my 34's I'm at 41.5" in the back and 39.5" in the front. I lost my original measurements somewhere and don't remember the stock rake. Just seems like it's more than it should be. 

I've jacked up the truck to look and make sure the shop did it right, given my other thread about the lack of replacing the nut on the UCA, but it appears right.

I even went down to the local GMC dealer to measure the rake on their new stock AT4 and AT4X. The X had a 3" rake from back to front while the AT4 only had a 2. I couldn't get inside to see what mileage was on either rig as the sales people were busy with other folks.

 

Does anyone know their rake or could measure it on their stock AT4? 

  • 3 months later...
Posted

This looks great! I'm considering a similar set up and have a few questions.

 

Do you notice any difference in performance, like handling or acceleration?

 

I find mixed reviews on whether or not the truck needs re-programming to make the speedometer and odometer accurate. Did you have it re-programmed, or is that something most people aren't doing?

 

Do you know if running 34s voids the warranty?

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Bilstein 6112 set at 1.2" level but netted about 1" with my 3.0 Diesel, rough country upper control arms. Fuel Vector 17x8.5 +7mm wheels with BF K03 285/75/17 tires. Tires measure just shy of 34".

IMG_6666.jpeg

IMG_6667.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Folks, Have a great new 2026 WT  (std cab, 2.7/4WD) w/base 40/20/40 mech adj bench "fake buckets"  (with lower and upper center console) heavy vinyl seats.  Overall the seats are very comfortable and the vinyl is heavy and appears less likely to 'split out'. Am very tall (6'5")  + a bad back/osteporosis/former hyperparathyroidism so ease/range of movement is a bit restricted.  The truck rides a bit high and I use a nerf step bar w/my left foot to step in, then I put right foot/leg in, drag my butt in  & get seated.  Worked fine in my 2018 RAM quadCab. But I end up dragging my butt over the left raised sidecushsion area of vinyl seat, and due to texture there's fair amount of traction on slide inward.  (ArmorAll didn't improve.) If the seat were even ~1/2" - 3/4" lower it'd be helpful, but base seats just have the forward/backward underseat bail and the side lever for tilt which really doesn't affect seat height.   I really don't want to 'de-puff' the left side sidecushion forming the  fake 'bucket'. I know one company sells 'seat elevator blocks':  but is there a simple way of lowering the height of the driver seat instead?   Thanks Bill W San Jose  
    • I have a basic 2026 1500 WT  (2.7L/4WD reg cab shorttbed). Comfy, generally happy with electronics/radio - but is there a way I can add switches to steering wheel right-side position (curr. empty) so I can adjust volume, push phone button to voice dial, etc? Bill W San Jose  
    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...