Jump to content

Reverse level - remove rear blocks

matt grz
 Share

Recommended Posts

matt grz Enthusiast

matt grz

Posted
Posted

I’m posting this here as well because no one seems to answer in the mods section.

 

I have a 2020 gmc elevation and had a dealer install the 2” at4 lift a while back.  I had drive line vibrations and they corrected the issue with a small shim, fat side facing rear.  The height of the bed is just too high for me to climb my big butt in and out of and I like a leveled look so I’m going to remove the rear blocks, install stock x31 shocks, remove the Joyce bumper spacer, and adjust the headlights.  I’m thinking this will give me a leveled look and lower the bed to a comfortable height.

 

I know several others have went this route and I was wondering if there is anything else that I might need to do?  I’m wondering if I’m going to still need that small shim with  the fat side facing rear?  Any other concerns anyone can think of?  Thank you in advance!

GETGONE Enthusiast

GETGONE

Posted
Posted

Why did you lift it in the first place? You won't need the shim if you remove the block. Did they install longer shocks when they did the lift? You might be able to get away with keeping what's on there unless they're bottoming out.

matt grz Enthusiast

matt grz

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I thought I’d like the lift, but the back end just looks silly to me and I’m a large guy and I didn’t realize I’d have so much trouble getting in and out of the thing with just the extra 2” but I do.  Lesson learned.
 

Thank you for the advice on the shim, saved me from doing it twice!

 

They did install longer shocks, my thought was if I remove the blocks those things are going to be compressed and stiff and the ride might be uncomfortable, but I’m not sure.

GETGONE Enthusiast

GETGONE

Posted
Posted

Were they the Rancho shocks that's standard or something else? The OEM Ranchos are pretty soft as is.

GETGONE Enthusiast

GETGONE

Posted
Posted

Yeah the lift package has longer shocks. They didn't give you the stock ones back?

GETGONE Enthusiast

GETGONE

Posted
Posted

OEM Ranchos aren't that great. Lots of people upgrade to Bilsteins and are happy with them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,980
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Fishboat
    Newest Member
    Fishboat
    Joined

  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 556 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • diyer2
      AFM Experience

      By diyer2 · Posted

      Hey guys, sorry for the confusison about this. This wasn't my experainnce, it was copied and pasted fom the net. 
    • KARNUT
      AFM Experience

      By KARNUT · Posted

      The problem with failure rates or increase failures are there’s people who don’t have a problem. What are you doing wrong they say. We had 4 5.7 GM diesel’s in the family when they came out. One was flawless. My uncle who happened to be the most abusive. Early rotary engines were known to use oil. I abused my first car so bad in six months I replaced the clutch, transmission and rear end. It didn’t use oil. My brother in law has a 2013 Tahoe and an older Yukon. The Yukon has 280K miles. The Tahoe around 175K. He runs them to about 300K. If his lifters fail before that time he would consider it a failure. My Hondas, I know people hate it when I mention them. Identical engines. One with cylinder deactivation one doesn’t have it. One shudders when the eco light goes on or off. Cylinder deactivation. But wait! According to the web. It can happen with lock up too. So now people in the know are changing the oil and transmission fluid more often. Then you read it could be a programing issue. So what do you do? There’s lots of money involved. I see three ways to deal with it. One only works if you don’t drive lots of miles. Lease, never get out of warranty. Or only buy older vehicles with a good track record. They all have bad runs. Usually when there’s a change. Even Toyota and Honda. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      AFM Experience

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • SwitchBladeSierra
      14-18 Sierra 1500 Heated Steering Wheel Help

      By SwitchBladeSierra · Posted

      UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • newdude
      Seems to be Missing a lot of Updates

      By newdude · Posted

      GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...