Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Im only at 19,000ish miles, and only towed the 10,000lb 5ver about 400 miles so far. But,,, the dash sais brakes at 94% front and 97% rear.  Everything looked great when i rotated my tires a couple weeks ago. 

Posted

Like the OP I have had several 2500HD over the last 20 years... my 2023 with 6.6 gas is eating brakes and has the worst warped rotors I've felt in a long time.  While at the dealer under warranty another cuatomer said he had the same issue with his 2500hd.  Mine sees no offroad or anything.  Michellin highway tires... no heavy towing.  I'm beyond disapointed.

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

Yes, my 2024 GMC 2500 started going bad about 18,000 miles.  Majority hwy miles.  Pulsating, steering shaking.  Terrible.  I had truck at dealer and only a 12,000 mile warranty...well of course if you use crap parts they don't want to warranty.  They said the brakes are safe and I should just deal with it until I'm ready to buy new ones.  Ha. Been buying GM since 1990 and the builds keep getting cheaper.  Pretty sad, jumped up to Denali this time and it's the worst truck I've had yet.  Man oh man not happy.

 

 

On 8/14/2024 at 11:38 PM, RGA said:

new to the forum and already I'm asking for input .

let me start by saying I lov my GMC  2500 HD this is my  fifth one since 2002, I

always buy the 2500 HD SLT 4x4 4 door, all gas except my 06 was a duramax, 

as for the brakes my experience has been I get 80 to 90 and 100k on the duramax  before ever needing brakes I retired last year and bought my last truck I hope ..

The brakes on MY 2023 2500 HD SLT  Sierra At4  went completely south at 9800 miles all highway between northern California and Washington state. AND I MEAN THEY DIDNT JUST START PULSATING IT went from fine to the worst warped rotors pulsating bad .the  dealer took care of all of it with front and rear new rotors new pads said GM knew about the issue they had mentioned dust getting behind them I called BS on that , I've done  to many brake job to know that they're always full of dust unless dirt was getting in and around the caliper piston causing them to stick they never elaborated on the reasons ,,anyway whatever the reason GM  replaced all the parts with supposedly upgraded rotor material and better pads ,,,,, I just turned 20,000 miles and the brakes are starting to do exactly the same thing not as bad but I can tell the rotors are starting to get warped  I have an appointment at the dealer tomorrow , my question for all of you have any of you had the same problem, I have searched the Internet cannot find anything about GM replacing rotors and pads due to bad material I see stuff about brake boosters pressure switches ABS systems on the up until 2018 I see nothing about 2023 with bad rotors because it 20,000 I'm sure there's gonna be pushback from GM brakes aren't warranty to begin with but they had a known problem they fixed it once and I will never let them off the hook looking for fuel  my argument .

 

Posted

I wonder how many new truck owners follow the break-in procedure concerning accelerating and stopping. I did as best as I could when I got my truck in Jan 2024. Currently at 12k miles. We’ll see how it goes in time. It’s my only vehicle and doesn’t sit around much. I’m retired and didn’t have to drive in rush hour traffic during break-in and didn’t start towing until late Spring. 

Posted

GM bought my truck back full price plus tax and license extra year of reg in California as you  know that's 1000 bucks a year plus the couple hundred dollars I spent on oil changes plus a $500 coupon towards a new truck I took them up on your offer I have since ordered a 2025AT4X , we'll see how this one does for you guys that don't push when your brakes go bad under 12,000 miles in California it's an easy lemon law GM knows it I didn't do anything I was in the middle of arguing with them to get it fixed all I wanted was them to fix the brakes a third time they did it twice they refused and in the middle of that argument out of nowhere they offered to buy the truck back how can you refuse I drove 20,000 miles on it for two years and it didn't cost me anything but gas and three month headache but what do you want perfection in this day and age  not gonna happen 

Posted (edited)

Good luck are you guys I know other states aren't as easy as California interesting note during that three month discussion with them and their agent they never admitted that this was a lemon they never admitted that there was anything wrong with the brakes they never admitted anything they offered to buy the truck back  as a 25 year GM customer .

And they wanted to see me satisfied that was pure BS they knew they had a  break problem and it's not nothing to do with the quality of the rotors or the pads this is the electronics stability control system, not ABS not the steering stabilizer not sway control but.. .ESC 

During my personal inspection because I took those brakes apart myself checked the rotors for run out yes I had all eight lug nuts torque to spec during the check of those but I went one step further I put my dial indicator on the rear axle HUB FLANGE if you guys know the three-quarter ton is a full floating axle it's identical to a front hub it is supported by two wheel bearings what I found is that axle Flange .008 lateral run out it should be less.0005 to be within limits.

So you could put a brand new rotor on that rear hubs and put a dial indicator on it and you would already have .016 thousands runout which wOULD  just compound daily as you used your brakes... I know my two statements contradict each other is that the ESC or is it the poorly machine axle flange I believe it's both.. our rotors are an inch thick and all specs say a rotor that thick can have.002 run out and they will last forever but you put that rotor on a bad axle flange and then throw an ESC system that's out of whack those rear brakes are like a parachute that's how the ESC works it wants to try and straighten you out at all cost by applying just the rear brakes Left and right whatever the computer thinks it needs to do to keep you going straight!

I do live at the top of a very windy mountain it's 4 miles long and I don't drive it slow. my four or five GMC Sierra trucks were not equipped with ESC and I never had an issue so I don't know what the heck I know is I'm pretty happy this week I know I got a brand new truck and didn't cost me a freaking dime.

Edited by txab
Posted
10 minutes ago, RGA said:

Good luck are you guys I know other states aren't as easy as California interesting note during that three month discussion with them and their agent they never admitted that this was a lemon they never admitted that there was anything wrong with the brakes they never admitted anything they offered to buy the truck back  as a 25 year GM customer .

And they wanted to see me satisfied that was pure BS they knew they had a  break problem and it's not nothing to do with the quality of the rotors or the pads this is the electronics stability control system, not ABS not the steering stabilizer not sway control but.. .ESC 

During my personal inspection because I took those brakes apart myself checked the rotors for run out yes I had all eight lug nuts torque to spec during the check of those but I went one step further I put my dial indicator on the rear axle HUB FLANGE if you guys know the three-quarter ton is a full floating axle it's identical to a front hub it is supported by two wheel bearings what I found is that axle Flange .008 lateral run out it should be less.0005 to be within limits.

 

 

 

Hub end play is 0.025 – 0.250 mm (0.0009 – 0.009 in)  

 

.008 is on the high end of in spec, but is in spec.  

 

Rotors assembled lateral runout is 0.05 mm (0.002 in).  Assembled is rotor on the truck, conical washers installed on the studs that will seat the lug nuts, and then torqued to wheel fastener spec.  

Posted

I'm not referring to end play on the hub or the wheel bearings that support the rear hub talking about lateral run out of the hub flange

  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 8/14/2024 at 10:38 PM, RGA said:

new to the forum and already I'm asking for input .

let me start by saying I lov my GMC  2500 HD this is my  fifth one since 2002, I

always buy the 2500 HD SLT 4x4 4 door, all gas except my 06 was a duramax, 

as for the brakes my experience has been I get 80 to 90 and 100k on the duramax  before ever needing brakes I retired last year and bought my last truck I hope ..

The brakes on MY 2023 2500 HD SLT  Sierra At4  went completely south at 9800 miles all highway between northern California and Washington state. AND I MEAN THEY DIDNT JUST START PULSATING IT went from fine to the worst warped rotors pulsating bad .the  dealer took care of all of it with front and rear new rotors new pads said GM knew about the issue they had mentioned dust getting behind them I called BS on that , I've done  to many brake job to know that they're always full of dust unless dirt was getting in and around the caliper piston causing them to stick they never elaborated on the reasons ,,anyway whatever the reason GM  replaced all the parts with supposedly upgraded rotor material and better pads ,,,,, I just turned 20,000 miles and the brakes are starting to do exactly the same thing not as bad but I can tell the rotors are starting to get warped  I have an appointment at the dealer tomorrow , my question for all of you have any of you had the same problem, I have searched the Internet cannot find anything about GM replacing rotors and pads due to bad material I see stuff about brake boosters pressure switches ABS systems on the up until 2018 I see nothing about 2023 with bad rotors because it 20,000 I'm sure there's gonna be pushback from GM brakes aren't warranty to begin with but they had a known problem they fixed it once and I will never let them off the hook looking for fuel  my argument .

I see that you are having an issue with your Brakes.  I do have a solution for you on this issue as this is a common problem with the material they are using.  If you want a better solution please contact me.  [email protected]

 

Posted
On 10/18/2024 at 9:30 AM, Jimmy in NC said:

Like the OP I have had several 2500HD over the last 20 years... my 2023 with 6.6 gas is eating brakes and has the worst warped rotors I've felt in a long time.  While at the dealer under warranty another cuatomer said he had the same issue with his 2500hd.  Mine sees no offroad or anything.  Michellin highway tires... no heavy towing.  I'm beyond disapointed.

 

Materials used now days are not up to specs and durabilty.  If you feel you haven't gotten the right answer, let me know as I have the solution for you.  Look up Pureforge.com. They are remarkable and will last the lifetime of your vehicle and you won't have to worry about issues.   

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Well guys GM actually came through after the repurchase of my 2023 AT4 that was my retirement truck and it was pretty sweet but I wasn't gonna get stuck with a truck that needed breaks every 12 to 20 kmiles , so a week ago Dublin Buick GMC called to tell me that my 2025 AT4X 2500 HD  that was a special order due to the 6.6 gas motor on 11/6 was ready and  all detailed out and ready to pick up but it was too late in the day for me to drive 100 miles round trip .

so I decided to wash off my Tonneu top that I bought for the 2023   so while I was washing that off soap and water and some stuff to  make it shine like new because hell it was new when I took it off .

but DAM IF I  DIDNT SLIP and fall on my concrete driveway that  has a little slope to it not much but wet and soapy that's all it took to slip and fall landed just right and broke my left femur the fracture went all the way through pretty low rotated slid up got  muscle damage anyway that's another story in the hospital for a week I cannot even get in this truck it's too tall for a gimp andits too painful but give me a couple weeks, and it was my left leg so all I need is my right go pedal foot I love in this truck man it's looking pretty good inside is loaded got the massaging seats got some other stuff that I don't believe was part of the AT4X package,

The good part of this  my daughter flew in from Scotland where she lives to help my wife take care of me for a week so that was a bonus out of all of this I only get to see her once a year so now it's twice a year back to the truck it's BITCHEN hopefully they fixed the brake issues they claim to have. I would like to hear some other GM REpurchase stories or am I the only one with a truck story well hopefully the picture loads sorry for the long post guys but that's what oxycodone does to me and the other reason I can't drive the truck happy happy happy as the other part the oxy does to an old 66 year-old man next week on Tuesday

IMG_3212.jpeg

Edited by RGA
  • Like 1
Posted


Well guys here's the end of my story first picture is the broken rotated femur just below the hip joint and the second picture is the repair check out that hardware and you got a zoom in on it all the way and I guarantee that no one else has hardware like that in their femur, don't tell my wife but while she was out getting me more meds and food and feed me I took my walker and my daughter and she was able to help me climb up into the driver seat sure feels taller than the planeAT4  man is it comfortable the seats are so nice the bigger dashboard compared to the 23 just the layout in general got the safe mounted inside the console the storage box with you know better than nothing plastic gun rack under the backseat heads up display was something I wasn't familiar with at first I could barely see it and I was puzzled  but turns out there is  a button to raise and lower the heads up display wow pretty nice I'll get it figured out got the OnStar and the my GM app connected paired my phone and drove it for about a 10 mile test drive no worries I hadn't taking any oxy all day so it's all good.

 It sure feels like it rolls better on the 305s then the 285 that my other truck came with so far I have no complaints how could I it's only just sitting in my driveway got my AirTag buried in it so that nobody will ever find it .
Well that is all oxy talking right there Honestly can't wait till I don't need that ****** Doctor says probably another week For the pain to reside

IMG_5508.jpeg

f80f9b1b-1a45-4727-b918-04aa95a9af87.jpeg

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Yes, it appears he traded it in.

 

How's the shoulder doing now?

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 693 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...