Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am thinking about replacing my 2014 Silverado 5.3 6sp trans 3.42 with a 23-24 5.3 10sp 3.23. Has anyone else done this recently? If so, what are your impressions, thoughts? Good or bad. Thanks for the help.

Posted (edited)

I don't own one but have driven many.  The 5.3/10 speed is a lovely combination.  Brings the 5.3 to life more.  Far superior to the 5.3/6 speed, especially the 14-18 given the questionable survivability of the 6 speed those years.  

Edited by newdude
Posted

The 10 speed makes the 5.3 feel like an absolute torque monster compared to the older 6 speed variant.  You will be very pleasantly surprised.

Posted

Wouldn't there be issues getting the 23-24 ( Global B ) electrical components to to play nice with the 2014?

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, redwngr said:

Wouldn't there be issues getting the 23-24 ( Global B ) electrical components to to play nice with the 2014?

 

 

Think he is talking about buying a new truck (but you never know😬).

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you all for your responses! I greatly appreciate it! Going to look at two trucks tonight

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, JimCost2014 said:

Think he is talking about buying a new truck (but you never know😬).

 

The response after your post indicates your interpretation is the correct one...🙂

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

One of the trucks I’m looking is a 2022 and it is not equipped with dynamic fuel management, or steering column lock. Are any of these a huge issue or problem?

Posted
1 hour ago, tkkz71 said:

One of the trucks I’m looking is a 2022 and it is not equipped with dynamic fuel management, or steering column lock. Are any of these a huge issue or problem?

 

 

Column lock - GM never had one on trucks from like 2003-2013.  Not the end of the world.

 

Not equipped with DFM (RPO code YK9 on the build sheet) - Makes the truck that much better of a buy.  The DFM hardware is still there (same lifters that the AFM trucks like your 2014 had but DFM is on all 8 cylinders) but the ECM is missing the chipset to run DFM operation.  AKA, that truck is a V8 all the time.  Major reduction of lifter failure probability.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...