Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Took the day off and made some big progress on the reassembly.   Man torquing those head bolts is not fun leaning over the radiator support.  Wore me smooth out today. 

20241119_174029.jpg

Edited by DK91105
  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/16/2024 at 12:57 PM, DK91105 said:

Here's proof you can do this with out a pan drop or pulling the oil pump forward.  Going back on was easier than removal.  Nailed the orientation in 1 try.    New cam and retainer plate installed prior obviously.  

20241116_125522.jpg

It's doable. Also nailed timing on first try. 

20241119_203101.jpg

Posted
9 hours ago, Colin Zwaschka said:

It's doable. Also nailed timing on first try. 

20241119_203101.jpg

 

 

Went on easier than it came off was my experience.   Looks like you are now at the point I was before yesterday's work.   Prep, prep, prep your surfaces.  Also make sure you chase all of the head bolt holes. I used a M12 x 1.75 long thread chaser from ARP.  P/N: 912-0016.  Attach a small hose to your shop vacuum and get in each bore to the very bottom and get all liquids / trash out.  I used a small $20 amazon special bore scope that plugs into my phone to verify all liquids were out of the head bolt holes.   This will take some time as getting the deck / head surfaces ready for reassembly is quite tedious work.  I found that acetone really cuts the old gasket material on the surfaces exceptionally well.  Carb cleaner I've seen people use in videos didn't even touch it.  

Posted
1 hour ago, DK91105 said:

 

 

Went on easier than it came off was my experience.   Looks like you are now at the point I was before yesterday's work.   Prep, prep, prep your surfaces.  Also make sure you chase all of the head bolt holes. I used a M12 x 1.75 long thread chaser from ARP.  P/N: 912-0016.  Attach a small hose to your shop vacuum and get in each bore to the very bottom and get all liquids / trash out.  I used a small $20 amazon special bore scope that plugs into my phone to verify all liquids were out of the head bolt holes.   This will take some time as getting the deck / head surfaces ready for reassembly is quite tedious work.  I found that acetone really cuts the old gasket material on the surfaces exceptionally well.  Carb cleaner I've seen people use in videos didn't even touch it.  

Yeah. Next up is cleaning surfaces. My least favorite part.

Posted (edited)

Well  I'm all done, back together, and running.   Here's a few final thoughts about this job now that it's all done.  

 

If you have a decently stocked toolbox and your back is in decent shape you can do this by yourself without pulling the engine. You will need a couple specialty tools but nothing crazy.  

 

The GM cam that is recommended for this job if you delete the DFM is called a "L8T" cam.  I was concerned that the engine would need actual tuning but that is not the case, It runs fine.  You will need someone with HP tuners to turn off the DFM and tell it to ignore all codes associated with it that would cause a CEL. 

 

Beyond all that, if you have it apart already, it's a great time to go ahead and do a tuneup.  I put new plugs, wires, belts,  and hoses on since they were off anyways.  This of course adds some cost but worth it to me.  I also did a couple of frivolous things like put a new water pump assembly on and purchased my own HP tuners.

 

All in all I have just over $3500 in the whole job including all parts, fluids, machine work on the heads, catch can, and the HP tuners stuff.   Compared to the one quote I received from a GM dealership it's quite a savings.  They quoted me over $10k for the job if the cam was bad which turned out it was and that was just putting it back the way it was with DFM lifters.  

20241124_125330.jpg

Edited by DK91105
  • Like 5
Posted

Quick little update, I have put about 100 miles on it since I finished it up. I don't know if it was cleaning all the gunk / buildup off of the valves, fresh plugs and wires, the DFM delete, or a combo of all of it but it certainly feels a lot more peppy.  Also at idle I have had to check several times if it had turned itself off. Its running so smooth its impossible to tell its even running at all 

 

Speaking of turning itself off..  I disabled auto start / stop in HP tuners. However the light on the button itself is still on. I believe the setting in HP tuners just denies the condition that would allow it to do the auto shut off but the truck is still looking. So basically it looks like its active but it will never shut itself off. I know with the Pulsar LT module it actually makes the truck think the button has been pushed and you get the notification on the dash and the light is turned off on the button. Just a little bit of info I found interesting. 

  • Like 2
Posted

This thread brings back memories of my younger days. The only difference the tear down was for performance modifications. Not longevity modifications removing junk that shouldn’t be there in the first place. As far as my lifter tap that happens only when the temperature falls below freezing. I just don’t start the 23 year old truck with the original engine until it warms up. You now made your ride bulletproof, good work.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

What pushrod length did you put back in? You used the LS7 lifters with the L8T cam, right?

 

ETA: You also took 0.003 off the heads. Assuming stock head gasket thickness?

Edited by Colin Zwaschka
Posted
On 11/25/2024 at 11:51 AM, DK91105 said:

Well  I'm all done, back together, and running.   Here's a few final thoughts about this job now that it's all done.  

 

If you have a decently stocked toolbox and your back is in decent shape you can do this by yourself without pulling the engine. You will need a couple specialty tools but nothing crazy.  

 

The GM cam that is recommended for this job if you delete the DFM is called a "L8T" cam.  I was concerned that the engine would need actual tuning but that is not the case, It runs fine.  You will need someone with HP tuners to turn off the DFM and tell it to ignore all codes associated with it that would cause a CEL. 

 

Beyond all that, if you have it apart already, it's a great time to go ahead and do a tuneup.  I put new plugs, wires, belts,  and hoses on since they were off anyways.  This of course adds some cost but worth it to me.  I also did a couple of frivolous things like put a new water pump assembly on and purchased my own HP tuners.

 

All in all I have just over $3500 in the whole job including all parts, fluids, machine work on the heads, catch can, and the HP tuners stuff.   Compared to the one quote I received from a GM dealership it's quite a savings.  They quoted me over $10k for the job if the cam was bad which turned out it was and that was just putting it back the way it was with DFM lifters.  

20241124_125330.jpg

 

Would turning off the CELs prevent someone's vehicle from passing OBD2 style emissions test?

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Colin Zwaschka said:

What pushrod length did you put back in? You used the LS7 lifters with the L8T cam, right?

 

ETA: You also took 0.003 off the heads. Assuming stock head gasket thickness?

I reused the stock pushrods.  No change in length is necessary with ls7 lifters and the L8T cam.  They removed .003" from the heads and I used stock thickness head gaskets.  It's not enough of a difference to really matter.  If you go more, you might start to get into the range of having to take it into consideration.   I'd ask the machine shop to be sure.  

Edited by DK91105
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Polo08816 said:

 

Would turning off the CELs prevent someone's vehicle from passing OBD2 style emissions test?

I have heard no, the DFM system isn't looked at with that style of emissions test.  My inspection literally expires today so I'll let you know what happens in the next day or so.  

 

I had to edit my comment, I just went back out and plugged in my OBDII reader and some of the items are not showing "ready"  I'm going to look into it.  

Edited by DK91105
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 11/30/2024 at 8:54 AM, Polo08816 said:

 

Would turning off the CELs prevent someone's vehicle from passing OBD2 style emissions test?

I figured it out. All emissions systems finally went into a "ready" status and it passed emission inspection in TX which is a OBDII plug in inspection.  So to answer your question, no this will not cause a truck to fail emissions inspection. 

Edited by DK91105
  • Like 3
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

GM should be ashamed of themselves but they don't give a rats ass.

That is A HELLUVA lot of work !  I've seen it done.  And that's just the DIS-assembly.  Then it all has to be put back together...........codes all checked.  blah blah blah

Myself...........I'd drive it until it blew.  Then drop a performance crate engine in it WITHOUT any fuel management bullshit.  I have a 2020 with a 5.3.  28,000 miles.  Lucky so far I guess,  BUT I

Change the oil A LOT.  It's all a guy can do, or  what you're doing, or........get a crate and drop it in.

GM really dropped the ball on this one.  Isn't there a class action law suit going yet?

Posted
On 11/19/2024 at 6:33 PM, DK91105 said:

Took the day off and made some big progress on the reassembly.   Man torquing those head bolts is not fun leaning over the radiator support.  Wore me smooth out today. 

20241119_174029.jpg

I agree.  The driver's side rear and passenger's side rear WORE ME OUT.  The angles are just all wrong for torqueing and adding additional degrees of turn.  I wound up moving a bench to the front of the truck and standing on that after my ribs and stomach got too sore to lean over the radiator support.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,634 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...