Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My 1999 4-door Yukon 4x4 is bottoming out the front suspension on big dips in the road.  I replaced the shocks, but that wasn't enough to remedy the problem.

Since this model doesn't have springs, I'm wondering if I can adjust the torsion bars in the 1999 or if I need to replace them?  If I adjust the torsion bars, will it affect wheel alignment?

Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, lunytnz said:

My 1999 4-door Yukon 4x4 is bottoming out the front suspension on big dips in the road.  I replaced the shocks, but that wasn't enough to remedy the problem.

Since this model doesn't have springs, I'm wondering if I can adjust the torsion bars in the 1999 or if I need to replace them?  If I adjust the torsion bars, will it affect wheel alignment?

 

 

Are your jounce bumpers still there?  If they are, are they worn out or missing?  The jounce bumper is an integral part of the torsion bar IFS on these GMs.  

 

If they are original or the rubber is missing, GM discontinued the standard bumper which fit 1995-2000 Tahoe and was the same bumper 1999-2010 HD pickups.  Because of this though, you can use the 07-10 Z71 HD bumpers, p/n 15835667.  

 

We had a tech get burned by that on an 03 1 ton dump.  Front end was super bouncy, tech sold shocks, didn't fix it.  The jounce bumpers weren't even in the frame anymore, just the stud and nut that's molded into the bumper was left.  New bumpers and it drove great.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for calling my attention to the jounce bumper!  I have the FSM, but I haven't been able to locate the bumper to make sure I'm looking at the right part. As far as I know, the bumper is original (I've owned it for over 20 years).

 

Here's a drawing from the service manual, as well as a picture of the front suspension in my rig. 

 

Can you point out the jounce bumper?  TIA!

 

20241025_162858.jpg

20241025_162029.jpg

Posted
3 hours ago, lunytnz said:

Thanks for calling my attention to the jounce bumper!  I have the FSM, but I haven't been able to locate the bumper to make sure I'm looking at the right part. As far as I know, the bumper is original (I've owned it for over 20 years).

 

Here's a drawing from the service manual, as well as a picture of the front suspension in my rig. 

 

Can you point out the jounce bumper?  TIA!

 

20241025_162858.jpg

20241025_162029.jpg

 

 

 

It would be above the lower control arm, rear "A" of the lower arm mounted on the frame.  

 

 

 

jounce.thumb.png.b7131ad106c23fc9701dbddff66c6fcd.png

Posted (edited)

Thx for the picture. Before I saw it, I took this picture from the other side. Is this where the bumper should be?

 

I presume the torsion bar is adjustable. Is that something I should look into, as well?

20241027_093852.thumb.jpg.667689d556685c8fcac377e9cf00500c.jpg

Edited by lunytnz
Posted

Yep, there should be a bumper there.

 

Torsion bars aren't typically 'adjusted'. But the years and mileage on the rig may have caused them to settle/wear some. There is a specification for adjustment - 'z-height'. It's not a very intuitive measurement to take. The easiest method, is to measure from the bottom of the lower control arm bolt to the ground and record the measurement. Measure from the rear lower control arm mounting bolt to the ground and record the measurement. The difference between these two is the 'z-height'. Refer to your factory service manual and confirm my measurement points because I might be remembering them wrong. It should also specify the measurement.

 

Torsion bar adjustment will require an alignment afterwards. 

  • 10 months later...
Posted

Thanks, again, for pointing out the missing rubber bumper and helping to clarify where it was supposed to be!

 

I was able to find replacement parts at Napa (I was surprised that they are about the size of your fist).  It was difficult to get the nut off the old, rusty bolt, because the OE bumper was COMPLETELY disintegrated, but I eventually prevailed.

 

I put it to the test on a drive on a Forest Service road with big dips in the road and no problems with bottoming out the front suspension anymore.

 

Here's a picture of the front suspension with the new rubber bumper installed.

 

Cheers!

 

Yukon Suspension Bumper - replaced - Mar 2025.jpg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Whoever greenlighted the work truck matte black front bumpers on every trim but the AT4X should be fired!  I was hoping that was an AI mistake, but just realized they were on every model of the 2027 Silverado too.     Some parts of the interior do look premium, but the Denali Ultimate dashboard looks like an afterthought.  At least they appear to have lost the microfiber the high end Silverado models showed, but the '27 High Country dash looks better than the Denali.  
    • New member here. I am researching a read-first event-recorder concept for late-model GM V8 trucks. This is not a sales post. There is no product link, price, preorder, or mailing list. I am trying to determine whether the underlying problem is real before building anything.   Has your truck ever had a brief problem such as: - rough running or a momentary misfire - an oil-pressure warning or unusual pressure event - reduced power or a brief stall - a U-code or lost-communication problem - a symptom that disappeared before the dealer or independent shop could reproduce it   If so, I would appreciate the following details: - year, model, engine, and mileage - what happened and under what conditions - whether a DTC and useful freeze-frame data were stored - whether the shop was able to reproduce it - what the eventual confirmed repair was, if known - what additional information would have helped the diagnosis   The concept being evaluated is a removable leave-in recorder that continuously retains a rolling window from before and after an event. It would not tune, reflash, clear codes, or change the vehicle calibration.   I am also not claiming that it could predict lifter failure or see every internal ECM variable.   The real question is whether continuous event history would add enough useful evidence beyond freeze frame, GDS2, and existing scan tools — or whether it would simply be another unnecessary gadget.   For owners and technicians, which problem would make something like this genuinely useful: 1. intermittent misfire or AFM/DFM-related behavior 2. oil-pressure events 3. lost communication or electrical faults 4. none of the above Please be blunt. Negative feedback is just as useful as positive feedback.
    • No tears over the SLE and SLT trim levels disappearing but I kind of loathe the "Elevation" name. It's a truck--skip the elegance.   The slab-dashboard design is decidedly different. Almost has a Hummer flavor to it. "Professional Grade" seems to be leaning very white-collar, tech-driven these days moreso than blue-collar, functional design.   The Silverado would be my choice between the two new trucks. Pleased with the engine lineup in both. The GMC is a little "too much" for a truck, IMO, and the Denali borders on ridiculous - but I do know there are buyers for luxury trucks out there. It's just not my speed.
    • Your safety is of utmost importance, @joshua1221, and we understand the importance of having all your lights working in your truck. If you have not already, we highly encourage you to bring your concerns to the attention of your local GM dealer. They are in the best position to diagnose your concerns as well as confirm the compatibility of the mirrors with your truck. Additionally, we would like the opportunity to explore any way we may be of assistance. When you have a moment, please visit: https://s.gm.com/support-request and fill out the support request form with all pertinent details. This form helps our team gather the right information and ensures your request is routed appropriately.
    • - I like the outside but not as much as the Chevrolet.  They ICE'd the EV styling and it works, but I think exterior goes to Chevy on this one.     - SLE and SLT dead = Not.  Surprising.  Fits into the rest of the GMC lineup like this which (aside from Pro) matches the rest of the family.  Elevation, AT4, Denali.     - Interior.  Sophisticated Malaise era.  Why do I say Malaise?  Drawn with a ruler.  Rectangles everywhere.  Looks very premium though.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...