Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What is w/ GM thinking this is a must have feature? Honda tried it years ago and dropped it. I was in Oshawa Truck when the QS4 (Quadrasteer) option was available on the GMT800s. I can probably count on 1 hand how many I've seen in the ensuing years. For those that don't know, they had a distinctive 'semi stepside' box side. Yes the $3000 price tag likely scared off most, but even then no other OEMs thought it worth their while to offer something similar.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

GM's Quadrasteer (QS4) system offered rear-wheel steering for better maneuverability and towing, but it didn’t catch on. The $3,000 price tag and added complexity made it too expensive for many buyers, and it didn’t offer enough practical benefits for the average truck owner. Similarly, Honda’s attempt with rear-wheel steering in the Odyssey also failed to gain traction. Ultimately, both companies discontinued these systems due to limited demand and high costs.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/13/2024 at 12:36 AM, revrnd said:

What is w/ GM thinking this is a must have feature? Honda tried it years ago and dropped it. I was in Oshawa Truck when the QS4 (Quadrasteer) option was available on the GMT800s. I can probably count on 1 hand how many I've seen in the ensuing years. For those that don't know, they had a distinctive 'semi stepside' box side. Yes the $3000 price tag likely scared off most, but even then no other OEMs thought it worth their while to offer something similar.

 

 

A practical party trick on a $90,000 EV truck lol.  

 

They probably figured with as wide as these EV trucks are and how rear steer is probably cheap to do they figured they'd have a go at it again.  

 

Q-steer had a 3.0 version that never hit the market too that had a narrower rear and a standard bedside but never made it past a couple test trucks.  +

 

GM Quadrasteer-[BI]And Why, Though Great In Principle, It Failed.   Well, the snow is starting to melt early. Many people acr

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

A practical party trick on a $90,000 EV truck lol.  

 

They probably figured with as wide as these EV trucks are and how rear steer is probably cheap to do they figured they'd have a go at it again.  

 

Q-steer had a 3.0 version that never hit the market too that had a narrower rear and a standard bedside but never made it past a couple test trucks.  +

 

GM Quadrasteer-[BI]And Why, Though Great In Principle, It Failed.   Well, the snow is starting to melt early. Many people acr

 

Looking @ the axle they used, & seeing that in Canada's oil patch @ the time all the company trucks (34 & 1 tons, there were Fords & Dodges, I thought the money would've been better spent on a really HD 4x4. 

 

That all being said, GM pretty much had the personal use market sewed up in Alberta.

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 12/2/2024 at 9:37 PM, revrnd said:

https://www.wardsauto.com/general-motors/quadrasteer-off-course

 

I didn't know it was available on the full-time SUVs.

 

 

Yea 3/4 ton Burb and Yukon XL.

 

Funny thing about those is though they just put a larger fender flare on it with marker lights and kept the regular rear quarter panel, where the pickups they went and made a specific box side that was wider, almost a 1/2 dually wide style setup.

 

Also another thought on why its made a comeback on the EVs is they are independent rear suspension so its probably that much easier to implement vs. the solid axle way they used on the Q-steers.  

 

2004 Chevrolet Suburban - conceptcarz.com

 

No Reserve: 2004 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 LT Crew Cab 6.0 4×4 Quadrasteer  for sale on BaT Auctions - sold for $19,500 on April 14, 2024 (Lot  #143,267) | Bring a Trailer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,993
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    President Roberto
    Newest Member
    President Roberto
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 230 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I don't wanna do major surgery/upgrades, behind-the-dash work, add amps, change radio etc. on my '26 std cab WT. On the WT, it has the base 7" IOR infotainment setup, and only two speakers (doors). Since I listen to classical, looked around for speakers that do well and dug thru reviews. Two-way speakers were found to be better than 3-way. So I've ordered a pair of  Infinity Reference REF-9632IX 2 way speakers.  [These may  or may not have been discontinued / succeeded by the 3-way ...9633 ones.]    These speakers are lauded for 3 ohm and 94db sensitivity spec so they'll work well for ordinary base car radios without amps and offer better performance (quality,  strength) than  default base paper-cone speakers. They'll be installed in a few days and I'll let y'all know what I think. Bill W San Jose      
    • Thanks!   Changed out the rear shocks today to Bilstein 5100s.  So far feel much better. The stock Rancho were wore out.  Lots of heavy hauling (2 moves, home renovations, etc).  Next up is new BFG tires Monday.  Cant wait the current tires have little to no wet traction and are super loud (hum)    
    • Ok, I got the all the codes. What do you all think would be a place to start?
    • How about I just point to the factory pans stand pipe little drain plug and claim its a pan with a real drain plug !. I just couldn't swallow the fact that a Dorman pan which at this point is probably the only pan out there that fits the gas version truck cost that much up here in Canada so I decided initially anyway to skip it and see what I thought of pulling the pan method and down the road if I felt inclined enough then I would either install a drain plug kit in the factory pan if there is enough room for it, or have a bung welded onto it, or put an aftermarket pan on. The thing is if the pan is not pulled then the magnets in the pan can't be inspected and cleaned or if wanting to change out the filter. However of course it certainly would make the job easier to be able to drop the oil first before having to handle the pan if dropping the pan that go around was the goal.    I knew a guy locally that was doing custom field spraying years ago with a pickup pulling a ground driven sprayer, I believe it was a GM pickup with an automatic trans. He had a drain plug in his pan and would drop the oil out of it once a week and top it back up through the dipstick tube to keep refreshing a portion of the oil often and that made the transmission last far longer than had he done nothing. Soft fields pulling 500 gallons of water at the start of each mixed up sprayer tank batch and in low range sucking along. I imagine he got some tips from other custom sprayer outfits doing the same thing at the time and learning from their blown up tranny mistakes. Transmissions then had no lock up converter so would cook the crap out of the fluid slipping that much and it would not have been synthetic fluid either. 
    • 3.39 Kroger’s in Montgomery Texas. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...