Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So we were fortunate to buy one of the new 3.0 diesels in early 2020. We enjoyed that GMC denali for the last few years but with all our long distance driving between our kids/home, it was reaching 100k miles and I read great things about the updated 3.0 (LZ0) and decided to trade in our 2020 and get a 2024 ZR2 Bison with the 3.0.  

For the last week we have been breaking the new truck in and driving across country.  We were very used to the DEF usage on our 2020 and with a 1000mile trip we’d normally (not towing) see about 2 blips down on the DEF guage.  However with the new truck, we are seeing significantly more DEF usage on basically the same trip (more than half way down) so we are kind of surprised.   I know Ive read of other owners who had the original 3.0 diesels engine and traded up to the new LZ0 one, so what has been your experience?  Love to hear feedback?? Thanks!

Posted

I don't have first hand experience with the diesel but some food for thought is that the emissions standards between 2020 and 2024 are possibly different and or that GM is a little ahead of the curve for changing standards and they want to meet those new requirements. So that way they stay compliant in the states that really crack down on testing. Also the ZR2 bison will make the truck work harder to do the same thing compared to your old truck. A lifted truck with heavy duty tires is causing more DEF usage.

Posted
2 hours ago, mark1968 said:

So we were fortunate to buy one of the new 3.0 diesels in early 2020. We enjoyed that GMC denali for the last few years but with all our long distance driving between our kids/home, it was reaching 100k miles and I read great things about the updated 3.0 (LZ0) and decided to trade in our 2020 and get a 2024 ZR2 Bison with the 3.0.  

For the last week we have been breaking the new truck in and driving across country.  We were very used to the DEF usage on our 2020 and with a 1000mile trip we’d normally (not towing) see about 2 blips down on the DEF guage.  However with the new truck, we are seeing significantly more DEF usage on basically the same trip (more than half way down) so we are kind of surprised.   I know Ive read of other owners who had the original 3.0 diesels engine and traded up to the new LZ0 one, so what has been your experience?  Love to hear feedback?? Thanks!

 

 

GM has an updated info bulletin about DEF usage on 2020-up trucks. 

 

READ HERE  - Unable to Fill the DEF Tank – TechLink

 

TLDR, don't add DEF until you see the countdown warning for "65MPH soon".  The algorithms are always changing the amount of DEF used based on fuel consumption.  

 

AND HERE - Diesel Exhaust Fluid Consumption – TechLink

 

The DEF dosing strategy will increase DEF injection when working the engine hard, especially during towing or high payload situations.  Also see ever changing emissions requirements.  Also, you now have a ZR2 Bison which is much less aerodynamic and fuel efficient than your 2020 Denali was which means increased DEF usage even when empty because lower MPG.  

 

 

Posted (edited)

I had a '21 LM2 and now a'23 LZO

 

I don't put much faith in estimating def usage per segment.

 

All def added as been from a metered pump, and when def is added the tank gets filled so I can do def mileage calcs the same way as fuel mpg. 

 

The truck is using def at the expected rate of 2% of fuel (2 gal def per 100 gal fuel). The older truck, and the 6.6's I ran before were all very close to the 2% of fuel usage rate.

 

Lifetime average currently 1380 miles per gallon. (first 24,734 miles)

image.png.c7ae13bbe7c4248f7559dde1683edb66.png

 

 

My question would be how does the fuel economy / fuel used during the trip compare with the previous truck? 

It it used more fuel -- speed, headwind, ac running hard due to highe temps, etc -- then it should use more def.  

 

 

 

Edited by redwngr
Posted

I really appreciate the comments!   I was also thinking that the ZR2 Bison is heavier than the Denali and less aerodynamic so that could be part the difference.. On our normal round trip run of about 2k miles, on the old Denali we would get about 24 mpg.. On this trip we just finished we got about 21 mpg.. I expected lower mpg due to the lift but had not considered a big DEF difference.. I guess ill keep monitoring and see if it is around the 2% of fuel usage.  As a side note, we do love the truck.. it is a beast and more suited to the remote area we live in now..

 

What’s interesting is our son also just bought a Trail Boss with the new 3.0 and I drove it back to East Coast for him. Even with the lift i didnt see the level of DEF usage we saw on this trip with the ZR2.  So there must be a factor of weight and we did have some headwinds coming West yesterday.. Anyway, thanks again for everyone’s thoughts!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,962
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    contrabombarde
    Newest Member
    contrabombarde
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 759 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks for all the help so far!   I did try right from 2026 right down to 2021, and only from 2023 down lets me select the option for tire psi change, but I get the vehicle not supported error!   I'll definitely try it under Chevrolet after work today, and I'll get the sensor number from gm for my truck tire sensors. And I'll let you know if it works for me under Chevrolet!   And if that doesn't work, I'm going to guess that what @Atlas said about maybe I have a different body control module could be true!  
    • From where I'm sitting this sounds like a compatibility problem. I'm assuming the 2007 was a 900-series truck, and not an 800-series (they were sold side-by-side in dealerships that model year), since it starts and runs.   This is why I HATE post-2006 vehicles. Everything becomes a huge problem when you try to keep the thing running for longer than the manufacturer has designed it to.    I can't remember when Global-A architecture started - either '10 or '11. For your sake, you had better hope it's '11, or you're going to be spending some BIG money to correct this cluster-eff. That's something you need to find out before doing anything else. You may have several computers bricked ... but the fact that it runs tells me you MIGHT be ok here.     EDIT: Just did a quick refresher. You're screwed. This is Global-A. The 2 systems are NOT compatible in the slightest. Once you get the correct engine in there that IS compatible, you're going to need to see how many computers are locked. Absolute NIGHTMARE to straighten out, too. Your buddy might be better off cutting his losses and finding something else.   Welcome to post-2006 vehicle electronics. This is why I quit the industry, and drive nothing built after 1994. This stuff takes all the fun out of wrenching!  
    • Recently acquired new 2026 Silv. 1500 WT  - L3B + 4WD,  std cab + std bed, in (duh!) Sierra White. Upgrades: replaced 'steelies' w/  Vision "Flow" black alloys,  17x8.5"; HDX nerf bar w/steps (black powdercoat); Weatherguard large/deep alloy saddle toolbox; Michelin fitted bedmat (sale, perfect fit) Weathertech door sill guards TBD: rear wheebox liners 4x black fender arch trim - searching for best  (Putco: chrome only; not looking for flares either!) -Bill    
    • True, hard to say what differences there may or may not be between Chev and GM as well as a production year or mid year part change either.    I just found it odd that under the Sierra choice on the Autel that many of the last few years of production year did not include the choice of changing the tire pressure but if that is an Autel thing or a GM thing as to why the choices were not there. Knowing what tpms sensors are on the truck should give some guidance into which choices on the tool even make sense to try as I wouldn't give up just yet with the tool but I guess he will see what if anything he comes up with if he finds out a bit more info and tries a few more things on the Autel. 
    • I'm sure if you went to a junkyard where you go in and pull the part off the truck yourself, not a used part place where they do it for you, you can get that part on it's own.  Depending on if and what else you would be buying, and time of day, they might even just skip over adding it as a item to the bill.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...