Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 12/3/2024 at 10:29 AM, bcrooms said:

All that you have mentioned has been checked by 3 different mechanics within the past year and none have resolved the issue.  

 

The P0303 only appears when the truck is under heavier load (steep road, more throttle, high MPH) and is only replicated in those scenarios. 

 

In my daily commute driving, it doesn't seem to have any issue.

Example: Intermittent miss cylinder #7, this only occurred on 'wetter' days. Visual inspection seemed fine, a new cap fixed it.

Also, found that the cheaper caps terminals would corrode on the inside causing intermittent miss fires. Pop the cap and clean the corrosion and miss went away.

I also have had a brand new set of plug wires with one bad wire straight out of the box.

 

Or, you can start looking at internal engine components that are specific to cylinder 3 that are more expensive to inspect and replace and less likely to be intermittent or load based.

Cam shaft lobes

Push rods

Lifters

Valves

Rockers

Intake gasket

Head gasket

 

An intermittent miss fire with no other symptoms such as smoking, noises, other codes, etc. doesn't indicate an internal failure to me. 

 

Fuel delivery up to injector 3 is not the problem...

Ignition up to distributor cap terminal 3 is not the problem...

Air intake up to intake valve 3 is not the problem...

Sensors that monitor the entire engine or cylinder bank are not the problem...

... otherwise the problem would be more widespread.

Posted

When the misfire occurs, or is replicated…it seems to happen during the last shift as the transmission is changing gears.

 

it will misfire for a few seconds, lose power / rpm’s then it feels like it shifts down a gear and rpm’s jump a bit and then it’s fine

 

 

Posted
22 hours ago, bcrooms said:

When the misfire occurs, or is replicated…it seems to happen during the last shift as the transmission is changing gears.

 

it will misfire for a few seconds, lose power / rpm’s then it feels like it shifts down a gear and rpm’s jump a bit and then it’s fine

I'd say unrelated except the increased engine load is inducing the miss fire.

 

Without the ability to actually diagnose in person, my guess is a bad injector, can't keep up with fuel delivery under load. 

 

How did the mechanic(s) confirm all the above suggestions were not the problem? 

 

All other possibilities are more and more unlikely.

Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, asilverblazer said:

I'd say unrelated except the increased engine load is inducing the miss fire.

 

Without the ability to actually diagnose in person, my guess is a bad injector, can't keep up with fuel delivery under load. 

 

How did the mechanic(s) confirm all the above suggestions were not the problem? 

 

All other possibilities are more and more unlikely.

The MPFI injectors were replaced for the 3rd time in Jan ‘24 by mechanic #1

 

Others diagnosed distributor, cap, rotor, wires, plugs and those appear fine

 

Compression was checked by all 3 guys and it was good.

 

each mechanic kept the truck for nearly a month at a time and couldn’t determine the root cause


to me feels like something gets stuck open or closed at the time of misfire / higher load and then frees up but then it has the rough, stumble idle (sounds like a muscle car at times)

Edited by bcrooms
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 12/10/2024 at 12:01 PM, asilverblazer said:

I'd say unrelated except the increased engine load is inducing the miss fire.

 

Without the ability to actually diagnose in person, my guess is a bad injector, can't keep up with fuel delivery under load. 

 

How did the mechanic(s) confirm all the above suggestions were not the problem? 

 

All other possibilities are more and more unlikely.

 

I have replicated the misfire on a mostly flat highway if I punch the gas and get it above 65 mph+ and when the truck shifts to the last gear, it immediately starts having the symptoms previously mentioned.  I either keep the throttle open until it quits or slow down until it stops.  

Posted
14 hours ago, bcrooms said:

 

I have replicated the misfire on a mostly flat highway if I punch the gas and get it above 65 mph+ and when the truck shifts to the last gear, it immediately starts having the symptoms previously mentioned.  I either keep the throttle open until it quits or slow down until it stops.  

Do you have a data logging device? Some way to monitor how much fuel and air are being consumed and burned - or not burned...

Posted
4 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

Do you have a data logging device? Some way to monitor how much fuel and air are being consumed and burned - or not burned...

 

At the moment I have a basic Autel AL319. I am planning on getting a better DIY scanner like the Autel AL539B or AL629

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I was doing an oil change recently and pulled the spark plug from #3 to inspect.  This is how it looked at time of removal.

 

I also checked plug #1, and it looked similar to #3.

 

I am planning to replace the plugs soon.

 

 

 

IMG_0935.jpg

IMG_0936.jpg

IMG_0937.jpg

IMG_0938.jpg

IMG_0939.jpg

Edited by bcrooms
Posted
On 12/9/2024 at 11:55 AM, bcrooms said:

When the misfire occurs, or is replicated…it seems to happen during the last shift as the transmission is changing gears.

 

it will misfire for a few seconds, lose power / rpm’s then it feels like it shifts down a gear and rpm’s jump a bit and then it’s fine

Are you feeling torque converter slip or poor TCC action? This can sometimes feel like a shudder or miss fire. Also a torque converter that doesn't lock up will cause lower fuel economy. You could still have a miss fire on cylinder 3 (not necessarily at the times you describe) in addition to failing TCC solenoid that isn't bad enough to trigger a code yet. (Transmission component slip detected or something like that...) 

 

Plug looks like it has a miss. 

 

Post a picture of the underside of the cap and rotor tips.

 

Fuel trim for that bank is still way negative? (Showing a bunch of unburnt fuel is making it through to the O2 sensor.)

 

Have you tried a spark tester on it? A visual confirmation of spark... 

Posted (edited)

So I ran some engine cleaner through it earlier today, and then took it for a good 25-30 minute drive. The drive ended with a test on the steep incline road near my house with more throttle.

 

Got the P0300 again.

IMG_1053.jpg

IMG_1054.jpg

IMG_1055.jpg

Edited by bcrooms
Posted

From the freeze frame data looks like bank 1 is running richer than bank 2 based on short term fuel trims. Not much else to glean off the data though. 

 

Still could be problem unique to cylinder 3 - potentially a more global problem. I would have to go back to re-read what has been done so far, but, there is a possibility that the bank 1 upstream O2 sensor is failing. That could result in an inaccurate/incorrect fuel trim for that bank. It would cause problems more wide spread than just cylinder 3 though. Hard to tell based on information so far. We don't know what the bank 1 sensor reading is, but if we infer that because of the fuel trim for that bank being leaned out the sensor must be experiencing a rich condition. For that to happen there has to be too little O2 in the exhaust. If the sensor has some carbon build up, it could not read all the O2 that is actually present in the exhaust stream.

 

Quote
  • Rich Air/Fuel Mixture: The signal is high (0.7 to 0.9 volts) when the air/fuel mixture is rich (little O2 in the exhaust).
  • Lean Air/Fuel Mixture: The signal is low (0.1 to 0.3 volts) when the air/fuel mixture is lean (Too much 02 in the exhaust).

 

If you're the gambling sort, and running out of things to bet on you could throw one on it. It might come down to spending money on better diagnostic tools, such as one that can record a log of the whole trip, or spending money somewhat guessing at parts. 

 

The alternative to that is that the sensor is reading correctly and is seeing the rich condition because a cylinder is miss firing and letting a bunch of unburnt fuel into the exhaust stream. We know a miss fire is occurring because at least we have a code telling us so and you can feel them. Still inferring from the short term fuel trim that the miss fires are on bank 1, it doesn't look like a global problem. It could still be just cylinder 3 or maybe another cylinder on that bank too. 

 

Someone would either have to go back through all the items we've already talked about to confirm they are good, or start a more intensive diagnosis; in no particular order of magnitude, maybe smoke the intake to confirm no intake leaks, pop valve covers and inspect valve train, inspect cam/lifters/pushrods, borescope to look in the combustion chamber for anomalies. 

Posted

A few other comments, I'm suspect of the ignition system, but didn't see that fuel delivery hasn't been ruled out yet.

Does the miss fire ever occur at low speeds, like taking off from a stop?

Does weather (temperature, humidity) cause the miss fire?

 

If it only is occurring at higher speeds, it could be that the fuel pump can't keep up. Check pressure and volume.

 

Check this link for reading on ignition conditions. The "higher" the discharge voltage the more stress on the ignition system. If the ignition system is weak in the truck then it will be noticed in the conditions described in the link.

https://www.denso.com/global/en/products-and-services/automotive-service-parts-and-accessories/plug/basic/spark/condition.html

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

A few other comments, I'm suspect of the ignition system, but didn't see that fuel delivery hasn't been ruled out yet.

Does the miss fire ever occur at low speeds, like taking off from a stop?

Does weather (temperature, humidity) cause the miss fire?

 

If it only is occurring at higher speeds, it could be that the fuel pump can't keep up. Check pressure and volume.

 

Check this link for reading on ignition conditions. The "higher" the discharge voltage the more stress on the ignition system. If the ignition system is weak in the truck then it will be noticed in the conditions described in the link.

https://www.denso.com/global/en/products-and-services/automotive-service-parts-and-accessories/plug/basic/spark/condition.html


The misfire seems to only be replicated while accelerating on an incline with higher RPM greater than 2k and letting the truck reach a speed greater than 55mph while on the inclined road.  It appears to misfire as soon as the truck reaches the last gear change during this scenario.  To me it feels like something gets stuck during the misfire (10-30 seconds most of the time) and then it frees up / stops misfiring.  Under typicall daily driving conditions to from home to work, it runs fine from what I can tell, I don't feel any misses.  Every so often it may have a rough idle but nothing that I can detect with my current scanner....

 

This truck has had the fuel injector kit replaced 3 times within 6 years.  I just recently replaced the Fuel filter about two months ago.  PCV valve elbow was also worn out, so I replaced it thinking that may have been causing a small vacuum leak...but didn't really make a difference.  

 

As far as I know, the truck has the original fuel pump, I'm sure it could be replaced, but it has been pressure and volume tested each time the fuel injector kit was replaced.  

 

I have considered changing the two upstream O2 sensors to see if it changes anything. 

 

Keep in mind it's been through diagnostics and tests by mechanics.   This issue leaves all of them scratching their heads.

Posted
6 hours ago, bcrooms said:

It appears to misfire as soon as the truck reaches the last gear change during this scenario.  To me it feels like something gets stuck during the misfire (10-30 seconds most of the time) and then it frees up / stops misfiring.

It seems you can readily replicate this scenario, the next time it does this, while it is miss firing, let your left foot rest on the brake pedal enough to illuminate the brake lights but not enough to really apply the brakes. Change nothing else as far as the throttle pedal.

 

Does the miss fire go away?

Posted
38 minutes ago, asilverblazer said:

It seems you can readily replicate this scenario, the next time it does this, while it is miss firing, let your left foot rest on the brake pedal enough to illuminate the brake lights but not enough to really apply the brakes. Change nothing else as far as the throttle pedal.

 

Does the miss fire go away?

I'll try that and see what happens

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 654 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...