Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I posted this reply to a diiferent thread, but am reposting it here hoping that more might see it. 

 

I just had my truck in for the recall addressing the rear wheel lock up issue yesterday.  I'm very disappointed in the "solution" that GM came up with to address it. All it amounts to is a software update that will monitor wear on the valve body.  When it detects that you are within 10,000 miles of a potential failure it will immediately throw the truck into Limp mode and limit you to a max of 5th gear. They have no intention of replacing any parts or doing a real fix until you actually have that happen. 

 

I'm headed to AZ next month - 1,500 miles from home.  5th gear item going to get me and an 8,000# trailer back home. Dealer said that these valve bodies can take months to get on back order.  So am I supposed to just roll the dice and hope it doesn't happen? I can't  sit 1,500 miles from home waiting on a part. I have zero confidence in this truck to take it on any long trips.  And GM apparently has no plan to change anything in the future until i might actually be limited to 5th gear, so all future trips will come with the same fear.

 

All this recall does is cover GM from liability.  It does not fix the problem. They are going to let the owners sit wherever they happen to be at the time a potential failure is detected.  They absolutely need to reengineer the part that can cause the failure and replace it.  Or at a bare minimum at least give us a warning 5,000 miles before throwing it into Limp mode and effectively disabling the truck wherever it happens to be. 

Posted (edited)

Honestly at this point I'm looking more and more into the NextGenDiesel Project Carbon 10L1000 DIY Valve body upgrade. I might just consider it as a $800 insurance policy. My wife's 3.0L Valve body took a dump last year and when they replaced it, the replacement failed immediately at the dealership. They ended up replacing the whole transmission with less than 5,000 miles on the "truck". I've been very lucky so far with smooth shifting and no problems after putting 4k miles on my '24 2500HD towing my 5th last year, but as the truck gets a little older and I start putting more miles on it I might just spring to do the project as a CYA.

Edited by davidm767
Posted
On 12/27/2024 at 11:55 AM, davidm767 said:

Honestly at this point I'm looking more and more into the NextGenDiesel Project Carbon 10L1000 DIY Valve body upgrade. I might just consider it as a $800 insurance policy. My wife's 3.0L Valve body took a dump last year and when they replaced it, the replacement failed immediately at the dealership. They ended up replacing the whole transmission with less than 5,000 miles on it the "truck". I've been very lucky so far with smooth shifting and no problems after putting 4k miles on my '24 2500HD towing my 5th last year, but as the truck gets a little older and I start putting more miles on it I might just spring to do the project as a CYA.

Are you thinking about installing yourself?  It's probably more than I woukd want to tackle, but my wrenching skills are limited.  I also wonder how it would cause any conflict with GMs software "fix", and what would happen if it ever threw a code for the transmission control valve. I'm sure you'd be on your own at that point. 

Posted (edited)

I called next gen about this a few months ago. Supposedly install doesn’t require any sort of tuning, and from reading the instructions and watching a few videos doesn’t seem too complicated for a decent or better diy mechanic to do. The only problem according to them is the upgrade is not factory “approved” and can void warranty. So for me it’s a waiting game, maybe GM will come up with an actually solution or recall to fix on their own, but either if my warranty runs out or if I have an issue and there still is a multi month lead time to get a new valve body I’ll just install it.

Edited by AndrewF
  • Like 1
Posted

I hadn't even thought about how it might affect the warrenty on the rest of the power train. I don't think I'd want to take a chance on voiding that.  

At this point I've started shopping for a different truck.  It won't be a GM.

If we start seeing many reports of trucks going into limp mode and sitting waiting for parts that don't exist, I wonder what that will do to the used GM truck market. Thinking I might not wait around to find out. 

  • Like 1
Posted

From what I've read GM's answer to this is to install a software patch that monitors the transmission and if a possible fault is detected it limits the use of the vehicle. So, in other words, they aren't gonna really fix anything only kick the can down the road. Also from what I read they are issuing this recall in stages to prevent the dealerships from being overran with service requests. I checked my VIN number and it isn't in the recall list yet, I expect that it will be eventually. A neighbor of mine with a 2025 2500HD has already had issues with his too, fault in the transmission.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
12 hours ago, No F-bdy Bs said:

Does this apply to the 10spd behind the 6.6 gas as well? 

For the early years that the recall includes no, those were 6l90's. 

 

24' up gassers get the same bum Allison 10spd and can experience the valvebody failure.

  • 1 year later...
Posted

After I had the software update, the dealership told me it is just a matter of time until the truck strands me in 5th gear.  They suggested I send an email to the CEO of GM ([email protected]).  I did so, and politely explained that I do not feel safe in 5th gear (~35 mph) on the highway pulling a trailer trying to get home.  I received a call back from someone trying to explain to me that the software they are installing, they simply forgot to install at the factory! 

I suggest everyone send a similar email, maybe we can get some attention to the fact that GM is not standing behind their powertrain warranty.    

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,212 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...