Jump to content

2019 AT4 Stock Tires - Dumb Question

HuffDad70

By HuffDad70
in Modifications, Wheels & Tires

 Share

Recommended Posts

HuffDad70 Enthusiast

HuffDad70

Posted
Posted

Been trying to find the answer here, but its not easy to find. 

 

I am getting new tires for my stock 2019 AT4. Currently have 265/60/R18's with stock offset (+24 per online). 

I am trying to use Wheel-Size to figure out where to start landing on tire size to fill out the wheel well, but not need to get anything trimmed or add on any lifts/levels. 

 

I like the Falken A/T4W tires. has anyone used this tire on their AT4 that can share what they did?

I'd like to go with 32.5" tires, which would be LT275/65/R18's but could also go to LT285/65/R18.

The LT285/65/R18's though have a rim width of 8-10. The AT4 looks like it has a rim range of 7.5-9.5, but can't really verify this. 

 

Below is what I am seeing, assume I would have to get the speedometer recalibrated at the same time as the RPM's are changing.

image.thumb.png.e47e944f90138e061682b1a75dddf5e4.png

image.thumb.png.8508f88a5ebea028d88af303899c450d.png

 

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

The stock size should be 265/65/18 and not 265/60/18.

 

For sure you can go all the way to a 275/60/20 in size without rubbing or trimming. So basically going from a 31.5in tire to a 33in tire.

 

Going with a 275/70/18 would equal the other stock size available. The 275/65/18 is barely any different in my opinion, just wider and hardly any taller. The speedo would only be off by 1mph, not even worth spending money to fix that. The 275/70 would be 3mph different and offer the biggest change in actual look. Taller and wider and when compressed the tire will be roughly 32.5in tall.

 

Only downside to all of this is that you are going to run a LT tire. Heavier and more costly. Fuel mileage could suffer if you care. As for the tires, the Toyo open country tires are better than the falkens in my eyes.

HuffDad70 Enthusiast

HuffDad70

Posted
  • Author
Posted

@CamGTP you are correct. The site I was using kept moving the OEM tire around. checked the sticker on the door last night and it agrees with that. Trying to fit a 33" tire. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • silveradosid
      Replacing 2.7L on 2021 Silverado with 2023 2.7L

      By silveradosid · Posted

      same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • Coastie05
      Replacing 2.7L on 2021 Silverado with 2023 2.7L

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • MASONV88888888
      Another 6.2L engine failure!

      By MASONV88888888 · Posted

      My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...