Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So I thought I’d give the engine bay a quick wash; used spot free rinse so it wasn’t high pressure.

 

It occurred to me later that I probably shouldn’t have done that. And I noticed the little symbol on the battery and computer indicating you shouldn’t pressure wash them…

 

The truck runs, no codes, or weird electrical glitches.

 

did I just damage the computer, battery or something else by doing this??

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted

You should be good. I always run the engine to warm it up afterwards this helps get any water to evaporate. Believe it or not, engine bays are made to be water resistant (like your watch lol). Just look at the environment they live it. I wouldn't spray the fuse box but your battery is fine, in my opinion. I've been doing this for 40 years with no issues, on my trucks & bimmer cars. I always say a clean engine is a happy engine. Now I'm waiting for the flames 🔥 LOL

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, rav3 said:

You should be good. I always run the engine to warm it up afterwards this helps get any water to evaporate. Believe it or not, engine bays are made to be water resistant (like your watch lol). Just look at the environment they live it. I wouldn't spray the fuse box but your battery is fine, in my opinion. I've been doing this for 40 years with no issues, on my trucks & bimmer cars. I always say a clean engine is a happy engine. Now I'm waiting for the flames 🔥 LOL


I also washed it when the truck was at operating temp. You think I could have cracked the block?

Posted

No, you won't crack the block. Is there something I'm missing on your post? What's wrong?

Posted
37 minutes ago, rav3 said:

No, you won't crack the block. Is there something I'm missing on your post? What's wrong?


no you’re not missing anything. Just overly concerned I guess.

 

Thanks for your help!

Posted

Your good. I do this cleaning with garden hose spraying on my '17 Silverado all the time. Warm engine & cold. But always run it afterwards to dry things out.

Posted

I had an unpleasant experience spraying an engine bay once. I used to do it regularly. It was the last time I did. The check engine light came on and it started misfiring. It was on a 2001 GMC. It was fairly new. I went to a parts store and got WD-40. After a day it was back to normal. Since then if I do it it’s with a rag. 

Posted

I have cleaned engine bays for many years, spray down with a cleaner of your choice and hose off with a spray from the garden hose. Not a power rinse.

I do cold engine. Pull it out of the garage, clean and put it back.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I had an unpleasant experience spraying an engine bay once. I used to do it regularly. It was the last time I did. The check engine light came on and it started misfiring. It was on a 2001 GMC. It was fairly new. I went to a parts store and got WD-40. After a day it was back to normal. Since then if I do it it’s with a rag. 

What ended up being the problem?

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, M1ck3y said:

What ended up being the problem?

I hit all the electrical connections, plug wires connections with WD-40 and drove to my hotel. I was out of town working. I used my trucks on pipelines it was dusty. I was at a self service wash bay using low pressure with their cleaner. Truck was running. After the engine I sprayed the truck and headed to my hotel. During the drive it started misfiring, on came the light. I stopped got WD-40 spray the connections. Next morning it was fine. It was going to work regardless. Happily she went back to normal.

  • Like 1
Posted

One of the things that came to mind after the problem of the miss fire. Was flood vehicles. A problem in Texas. You can clean the vehicle like new with exception of the creep of water into electric connections. So any kind of pressure can force water deep into those connections. Some videos I’ve watched about cleaning the engine has everything getting wrapped to keep out water. The few vehicles I cared about keeping the engine bay clean since. I used a paint brush a few shop towels and hand wipe. The rest just stay dirty. I’ve never had a service writer suggest an engine cleaning. They don’t miss when it comes to making a buck.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, KARNUT said:

One of the things that came to mind after the problem of the miss fire. Was flood vehicles. A problem in Texas. You can clean the vehicle like new with exception of the creep of water into electric connections. So any kind of pressure can force water deep into those connections. Some videos I’ve watched about cleaning the engine has everything getting wrapped to keep out water. The few vehicles I cared about keeping the engine bay clean since. I used a paint brush a few shop towels and hand wipe. The rest just stay dirty. I’ve never had a service writer suggest an engine cleaning. They don’t miss when it comes to making a buck.

Yes, a flooded vehicle is NOT the same as washing the engine bay. As I said above, they are water resistant Not waterproof. 

Washing off the Beauty Cover, Firewall, fan shroud & inside fenders usually doesn't push water into electrical connectors. However, they can create a short to ground for spark plugs & plug wires, but they will dry out & once the water is gone, so is the ground.

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, rav3 said:

Yes, a flooded vehicle is NOT the same as washing the engine bay. As I said above, they are water resistant Not waterproof. 

Washing off the Beauty Cover, Firewall, fan shroud & inside fenders usually doesn't push water into electrical connectors. However, they can create a short to ground for spark plugs & plug wires, but they will dry out & once the water is gone, so is the ground.

I was using that as an example. My opinion such as it is. Why take the chance? Some vehicles with unique engines are one thing. Truck engines something else. I just started cleaning them by hand. Like usual I pass on examples of my experiences. That lead me to research the proper way to clean an engine. I never got burned by following the recommended vehicle maintenance procedures either. Like lifetime transmission fluid or 150K anti freeze. Now converting to the 150K plus vehicle usage more frequently doing service is a must. Having luck doing something that could be risky. Could be costly. I’ve been very lucky. I’m just a little more proactive these days. 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,909
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DWic
    Newest Member
    DWic
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 699 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Do you think this width might affect the chalk test with a higher pressure closer to 65psi? I think lowering the pressure makes sense to get the tread to lay flatter
    • I had an alternator fail that was shorted internally in such a direct fashion in addition to the larger gauge cables that it appeared like a VERY dead battery. Granted I think the car did power up, it definitely wouldn't start.   Rodent damage to wiring?
    • ... I don't think he could.
    • Using experience to justify bad advice is lazy and typical of someone incapable of articulating why their advice is prudent.    This immediately sets off the BS alert and the advice that followed certainly qualified.   Asking an idiot for help getting out of dumb situations because he is an expert... at getting himself into dumb situations.   Unless I've been living in an alternate universe - the first thing everyone does when getting into a sticky situation is shift to a higher gear 🤨.   Of course not, the torque multiplication, mechanical advantage and finer control typically afforded by the lower gear is far better suited for this scenario.   There ARE scenarios where a higher gear MIGHT be appropriate determined more by the drivers ability to control EXCESSIVE wheel spin versus applying torque to the ground.
    • I'm not sure I agree with "extreme" low speed, high torque sentiment here with regards to the prescribed use of low range. How about...whenever it's needed?   A 2.72:1 transfer case and whatever differential gears these Silverados have (3.42's, maybe?) aren't producing "extremely" low crawl speeds. Or insanely high torque multiplication. Even with the 1st gear in these newer transmissions. But it does provide mechanical advantage and potentially better control at slower speeds. And with extra weight or towing, I think it adds mechanical sympathy for the truck as well.   Plus, traction control and the other assists generally turn off when you shift into low range. Those aren't needed here, they'll work against you if you need wheel spin. In high range you'll need to figure out how to turn off the various modes those assists provide. Depending on the vehicle, those things don't all automatically turn off or turn completely off.   While I agree that a farmer might have some great practical experience, a recommendation to "always" using one gear isn't very informed advice. If the farmer had said WHY and could explain the physics behind his prescriptive "always" I'd definitely listen. The way he's described here makes it sounds like he could either be uninformed or is telling everyone what worked for him, not necessarily that there could be a more advantageous way about things.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...