Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Please share some insight into my recent oil analysis. Oil type is unknown, was last changed at the dealership before I purchased the truck. Over 79,000 miles on the motor, 4,200 miles on oil when sampled/changed.

 

No current issues, oil burning minimal. Just wanted to get a baseline.

20 SIERRA 1500-250510-edit (1).pdf

Posted

Total wear metals come in at 6.9 ppm/K miles. Iron alone is almost 5 ppm/K miles. 

Base on the Universal Averages 6.4 ppm/K total wear metals and 3.1 ppm/K iron are their benchmarks. 

What does that indicate to you? 

 

Some critical information is missing. TBN and Oxidation and any VOA data so we know what is background and what is wear.

 

Hint: With the recent increases in Blackstone Labs pricing AND lack of critical information AND crackle test for water and flash cups for fuel; you will find @Black02Silverado can set you up with a cheaper and more complete and accurate test. 

 

Outside the fact that this motor is running close to Universal Averages doesn't mean meaningful improvement can't be made in wear. Your past warranty, yes? No? If so believe GM. Start using a decent 0W40 or at least a 3.5 minimum HTHS 5W30 (ACEA C3). 

 

Will it fall apart if you don't? No. It will just live longer if you do. How long is your choice. And find an oil with some solvency or that little bit of oil consumption will become something other... Valvoline Restore and Protect 5W30 would be a good fist shot even though it isn't a polar oil. It does it's cleaning by other chemical means and while not 3.5 it is 3.3 HTHS which is a vast improvement over the 2.6 HTHS oil now in it. 4K OCI without TBN seems safe. 

 

Now let the rain begin. :crackup:That's my story and I'm sticking to it. 😬

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

Thanks @Grumpy Bear. That iron ppm is exactly why I posted. I'll look deeper into which oil (0w40 or 5w30) and brand will be my next move. I don't know what HTHS is, but I'll go do my own research on that.. Who knows what oil the dealership would have used that was in it previously.. 

 

Interested to learn more about the analysis @Black02Silverado offers.

Edited by BainMan
  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, BainMan said:

Thanks @Grumpy Bear. That iron ppm is exactly why I posted. I'll look deeper into which oil (0w40 or 5w30) and brand will be my next move. I don't know what HTHS is, but I'll go do my own research on that.. Who knows what oil the dealership would have used that was in it previously.. 

 

Interested to learn more about the analysis @Black02Silverado offers.

I can get you Oil Analizers used oil kits. The best price is to be a Preferred Customer. I can get you set up. I just need your name,address,email address and phone number. You can send it in a PM. 

Posted
12 hours ago, BainMan said:

Please share some insight into my recent oil analysis. Oil type is unknown, was last changed at the dealership before I purchased the truck. Over 79,000 miles on the motor, 4,200 miles on oil when sampled/changed.

 

No current issues, oil burning minimal. Just wanted to get a baseline.

20 SIERRA 1500-250510-edit (1).pdf 18.38 kB · 18 downloads

 

 

Some things to keep in mind. 1.) And average is just that. When they give you one there are motors below and above that nominal value. 2.) Each motor platform and even state of factory tune can have a large impact on the actual values. Not every power cylinder is laid out the same. Ring choice, bore hardness and material type, etc. This may be good for that motor with that oil. Not alarming. But you MAY be able to improve those results. 

Posted
On 6/10/2025 at 9:41 AM, BainMan said:

Thanks @Grumpy Bear. That iron ppm is exactly why I posted. I'll look deeper into which oil (0w40 or 5w30) and brand will be my next move. I don't know what HTHS is, but I'll go do my own research on that.. Who knows what oil the dealership would have used that was in it previously.. 

 

Interested to learn more about the analysis @Black02Silverado offers.

Bainman, ask Nick, @Black02Silverado about the air leak sucking dust in around your air filter system ( maybe air filter itself ?) from this analysis. No one seems to correlate that to iron wear level. Insolubles in 4200 miles too high. 
I’d correct dust leak and run Valvoline Restore Clean and Protect 0w-20 for an interval. 
 


 

Posted
On 6/10/2025 at 9:41 AM, BainMan said:

Thanks @Grumpy Bear. That iron ppm is exactly why I posted. I'll look deeper into which oil (0w40 or 5w30) and brand will be my next move. I don't know what HTHS is, but I'll go do my own research on that.. Who knows what oil the dealership would have used that was in it previously.. 

 

Interested to learn more about the analysis @Black02Silverado offers.

Drop by here and get a proper interpretation ; 

 

 

Posted

@BainMan Silicon too high and is dirt causing increased iron wear especially for only having 4,200 miles on it. When was the last time the air filter was changed? 
Manganese and potassium are dirt that are knocking off fuel deposits and potassium chloride from salt .

 

With only 4,200 miles the insoldubles shouldn't be what it is and max of 0.2 or less.  What oil filter are you using?
 

Also, what fuel are you using?  Any chance to get E85 and mix it in?  I can run 9 gallons of E85 to a tank and not throw any check engine light codes.  Any higher and I get running lean on both banks.  It runs so much better using E85 like that. It also helps burn cleaner and has higher octane.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 7 months later...
Posted
On 6/13/2025 at 8:30 AM, Black02Silverado said:

@BainMan Silicon too high and is dirt causing increased iron wear especially for only having 4,200 miles on it. When was the last time the air filter was changed? 
Manganese and potassium are dirt that are knocking off fuel deposits and potassium chloride from salt .

 

With only 4,200 miles the insoldubles shouldn't be what it is and max of 0.2 or less.  What oil filter are you using?
 

Also, what fuel are you using?  Any chance to get E85 and mix it in?  I can run 9 gallons of E85 to a tank and not throw any check engine light codes.  Any higher and I get running lean on both banks.  It runs so much better using E85 like that. It also helps burn cleaner and has higher octane.  

Somehow I missed your reply (a long time ago). Running Shell 93, but get the occasional Sam's Club 91 when I don't have time to make it across the river to the Shell. I've never considered mixing in E85.. Do you fill the rest of the tank with premium or is 89 good when mixing E85? 

 

Air filter looked clean after purchasing the truck, so I have not changed it.. I took it out and combed through looking for debris. It looked like the dealership changed it, or it was recently changed prior to them getting it.  I'll add it to the list though, I don't like not knowing how many miles are on it..  

 

Oil filter - Purolator PL22500 with Mobil 1 0w-20 High Mileage. 

 

I'm 3,000 miles into this oil change, may consider getting it analyzed again at 4,000... 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, BainMan said:

Somehow I missed your reply (a long time ago). Running Shell 93, but get the occasional Sam's Club 91 when I don't have time to make it across the river to the Shell. I've never considered mixing in E85.. Do you fill the rest of the tank with premium or is 89 good when mixing E85? 

 

Air filter looked clean after purchasing the truck, so I have not changed it.. I took it out and combed through looking for debris. It looked like the dealership changed it, or it was recently changed prior to them getting it.  I'll add it to the list though, I don't like not knowing how many miles are on it..  

 

Oil filter - Purolator PL22500 with Mobil 1 0w-20 High Mileage. 

 

I'm 3,000 miles into this oil change, may consider getting it analyzed again at 4,000... 

 

OK, it would be good to see the UOA.  It's not expensive and so I would change out the air filter.

 

As for E85, I put in 9 gallons and then fill up with 93 but 89 would work just as good I would imagine.  The E85 is what boost the octane anyway.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 403 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...