Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So i have a 2017 GMC sierra 1500 All Terain. Rear window passenger side exploded one day while in the truck. Noticed burning plastic in the vehicle. Looks like these trucks have an issue with the rear defoger getting to hot and with cold temps window shaters. Anyway take it to GM they said yes we see the burned up plastic sliding window cover. So they approve a window replacement under a recall. Wait 2 weeks finally gets approved. I scedule an apointment with service. drop off the truck stayes there one day and over night. pick up the truck next day had to get to work seems ok. Pick up my grand kids theres no female seatbelt buckle in the seat area. I have a look and it seems they remove the rear seat when installing the window so when they put seat back in the buckle was not fead through the seat and was jammed up behind the seat. so i fish it out let the servicxe guy know they forgot to put it through. Yesterday i go to wash my truck and the slider is pissing water like crazy. on further looking i see rocker sill damaged and dented and top edge of window clear coat scrached away brobly from there cut out tool to remove window. so i take it back to service and they call the window installer. apperantly they dont have an in house window tech they call in a window installer to install there product. Owner come to service and looks at the damage plus window leak. says well its a defective window. OK so replace it . waht about the damages. so he says well look after it . so i call next day service guy says that the installer asked his guys and they said they dont remove the seat on the drivers side on ly the small halh on the passenger. There liing .I said well if only the passenger side was removed then why was the seat belt not tucke through the seat. only way its jammed behind the seat is if the seat was removed. plus you can seethe theads on the seat bolt the paint is missing. so know the service has to check cameras to see if the installers guys took the seat out from the drivers side. which 100% they did. Window guy says your sure it wasnt there. they give you the run around . sure the window instarres guys are going to say they did not remove the seat from drivers side . Why would they only remove the smaller side and not the lager side. total liers.

 

1.jpg

truck5.png

2 truck.png

Edited by benelli
needed pictures
  • Sad 1
Posted

Don't give in and keep on them. Hopefully the dealer wises up and stops using this 3rd party installer.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, mikeyk101 said:

Don't give in and keep on them. Hopefully the dealer wises up and stops using this 3rd party installer.

Ya not going too. When they make money they get back to you right away. But warranty work they take there time guess they don’t make as much. Just sitting in the dealership service department. Man to they rape people on service.

 

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • For some unexplained reason my father wanted a salvage yard. As we were getting the family business off the ground one brother ran the salvage yard. We gathered there when rained out working on pipelines in the eighties to pull parts. Perfectly good running vehicles would come to us simply because they wouldn’t pass emissions inspection. We were able to swap parts and sell some of them. I got a clean old nova with a bad engine. I pulled a perfectly good small block out a Camaro. A father and son project with a rebuilt engine. The son couldn’t get the engine running right. The problem was the spark plugs weren’t gapped. The 90s vehicles probably widened the gap of shade tree do it yourself engine repair. My do it yourself hot rod repair stopped at the 70s. After that my trusted mechanic kept them in running shape. 
    • I have an old dental chair in my shop. Something I got for free and apparently it has more than scrap value? People collect them although mine isn't restored or anything. It's visually interesting (1930's Ritter) which is why I like it. And it IS decently comfortable if you kick back.   When a good buddy of mine saw it he said, let me guess, Atlas. It's a conversation piece? As in, you ask the questions, they do the talking?   Where do you hide the jar of teeth?   I would never.   
    • Are we talking about the same thing, though? The 7 versus 3 wear metals was from Lakespeed's 3.0-specific oil brand comparison test between AcDelco oil and Mobil ESP. The filter remains a constant so whatever excess particles the AcDelco oil is producing aren't being filtered out.   I'm assuming there's a parallel comparison to be made; IF the filter can filter down those particles, engine life increases, and your graph makes the case that a better filter (lower micron rating) can increase engine life. Introducing fewer particles AND filtering those particles with higher efficiency is the best of all worlds. Good oil, good filter.   Where we may disagree is the "baseline relative engine life". I'm more apt to believe the base engine life value is 200k+ on very average oil and filters, "bulk oil of unknown brand and white-label generic fleet-grade filter, Jiffy Lube"   Going from a 10 micron filter to a 5 micron filter should boost a base 200k to 275k in a vacuum as a single factor alone.   Here's the whatabout: How does regularly changing the oil and filter ahead of recommended schedule influence baseline engine life? Most people aren't going to science the heck out of this stuff or ask about Micron ratings, HTHS, or wear comparison tests at Jiffy Lube. Most of the Jiffy lube techs would say they need to call their tech support line to even try to get an answer.   --   Because we love anecdotes here, when I was fishing for 4.3 parts at a local yard this weekend, ALL of the 4.3 vehicles had well over 200k. I love looking at odometers of junked vehicles. How far did THIS go before landing at the crusher? The ones that still had engines weren't seized. None of them were vehicles I'd consider were Amsoil queens, in fact most of them had some kind of service cling-sticker in the corner of the windshield indicating it probably had very average maintenance services. Even the fresh parts rigs- I'm not sure taking an S/T series to 400k has much value considering the running value of those vehicles was probably somewhere around $1,000. 25+ years is a good run on time alone.   The intake manifold I salvaged had clean and bright pool areas. As expected, I found the fuel lines in the manifold rubbed through, just like mine. I'm guessing the lines on that donor truck started leaking, the truck started running rough, and its owner said that's enough I'm unwilling or can't take it out of service for several days, or spend $1000+ to repair it at a shop, it's simply time for a newer more reliable vehicle (or, more than likely, this is the 2nd, 3rd time this has happened in the truck's lifetime). While I don't count on my Blazer for reliability, the thought of giving it away for parts at certain points during my adventure, and being mentally free from its needs has has crossed my mind. I'd be losing $1500 or so, but I can only make more money; not time.
    • still $4.00 85 oct.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...