Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The AC in my 2018 LTZ went out. I hooked up a manifold gauge set and put the system under 30inHg of vacuum. Over the course of two hours it dropped to about 27inHg. It makes me think a seal on the compressor is bad. I am going to throw some 1234yf (as called for by info panel on fan cowling) that is dyed to verify.

When researching replacement compressors, I found GM Genuine 85656961; This is what GM Genuine's website reccomends based on my VIN. RockAuto lists that part number under GM Genuine 86798574, which does not exist on the GM Genuine site.

The listing on RockAuto says that it is R134a. My truck has the 1234yf sticker. I know MY2017/2018 was the transition years for 134a to 1234yf Are the two compressors compatible? I know that 134a and 1234yf do not mix and use different fittings.

Any help is appreciated.

Rock Auto listing https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo.php?pk=14080089&cc=3437551&pt=6628&jsn=1000

GM Genuine https://parts.gmparts.com/product/gm-genuine-parts-air-conditioning-compressor-kit-85656961

Posted
21 minutes ago, Roadkill_Gaming said:

The AC in my 2018 LTZ went out. I hooked up a manifold gauge set and put the system under 30inHg of vacuum. Over the course of two hours it dropped to about 27inHg. It makes me think a seal on the compressor is bad. I am going to throw some 1234yf (as called for by info panel on fan cowling) that is dyed to verify.

When researching replacement compressors, I found GM Genuine 85656961; This is what GM Genuine's website reccomends based on my VIN. RockAuto lists that part number under GM Genuine 86798574, which does not exist on the GM Genuine site.

The listing on RockAuto says that it is R134a. My truck has the 1234yf sticker. I know MY2017/2018 was the transition years for 134a to 1234yf Are the two compressors compatible? I know that 134a and 1234yf do not mix and use different fittings.

Any help is appreciated.

Rock Auto listing https://www.rockauto.com/en/moreinfo.php?pk=14080089&cc=3437551&pt=6628&jsn=1000

GM Genuine https://parts.gmparts.com/product/gm-genuine-parts-air-conditioning-compressor-kit-85656961

 

 

85656961 and 86798574 are both correct.  85656961 is the current number, 86798574 is the previous number, so Rock Auto probably has some older stock is all.

 

Compressor services 2015-2018 so the type of freon won't matter.  Fits trucks that had either R134a or R1234yf.  

 

Be careful just adding in freon.  You don't want to be in a position of it being overfilled.  The ideal thing would be to have a shop suck it down and recharge it with dye to the proper amount, then look for leaks.  

 

My gut says your condenser is bad, which they always are on these 14-19 trucks.  Could also be one of the two hoses connecting to the compressor. 

  • Like 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

85656961 and 86798574 are both correct.  85656961 is the current number, 86798574 is the previous number, so Rock Auto probably has some older stock is all.

 

Compressor services 2015-2018 so the type of freon won't matter.  Fits trucks that had either R134a or R1234yf.  

 

Be careful just adding in freon.  You don't want to be in a position of it being overfilled.  The ideal thing would be to have a shop suck it down and recharge it with dye to the proper amount, then look for leaks.  

 

My gut says your condenser is bad, which they always are on these 14-19 trucks.  Could also be one of the two hoses connecting to the compressor. 

Hmm, I will check out the condenser as well. When I hooked up my gauges I had 0 psi on high and low side, and never smelt any Freon during the vacuuming down. My diagnostic tool was reading 5psi on the high side when it was around 80deg out. I'm pretty sure I had nothing in the lines to recover.

Before I buy any parts, I am going to charge with 1 can of 1234yf-uv (8oz) to find the leak for sure.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...