Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, PunchT37 said:

For your viewing pleasure?

 

 

2018 I had a 2015. 217k hard miles no oil consumption.

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, riddler said:

2018 I had a 2015. 217k hard miles no oil consumption.

Only point I`m making is, this ****** happens.

Edited by PunchT37
Posted
5 minutes ago, PunchT37 said:

Only point I`m making is, this ****** happens.

Oh absolutely, my point is and has been driving style matters not. All brands manufacture faulty engines from time to time. 

Posted

I joined this website to gain knowledge and entertainment. I like most people lived in a bubble. Like minded people with different talents to build a thriving business. I share knowledge and experience with no agenda. When I retire I did Uber for awhile because I like to drive and you get paid to do it. I wanted to experience different personalities and life experiences. I got an education. The common theme it appears some people don’t want to learn anything. They want parity. Your experience can’t be true. Mine is reality. It’s really simple if you can’t deal don’t read it. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, KARNUT said:

There’s not many people who have had more experience with multiple vehicles than I have.

 

All combustion engines burn oil, literally, by design. The cylinder walls have to remain lubricated between strokes of the piston which means the rings can't and shouldn't totally wipe the cylinder walls clean when they pass. As such, oil on the cylinder walls is present during the combustion phase and is also susceptible to combustion, i.e. burning. And that's in a perfectly healthy engine with perfectly seated rings with perfect maintenance, whether you use Valvoline or Amsoil or whatever snake oil of your choice.

 

Anyone with such experience with multiple vehicles should know this; if you are the guy with the most experience and knowledge in this room, we're hosed.

Edited by Atlas
  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

All combustion engines burn oil, literally, by design. The cylinder walls have to remain lubricated between strokes of the piston which means the rings can't and shouldn't totally wipe the cylinder walls clean when they pass. As such, oil on the cylinder walls is present during the combustion phase and is also susceptible to combustion, i.e. burning. And that's in a perfectly healthy engine with perfectly seated rings with perfect maintenance, whether you use Valvoline or Amsoil or whatever snake oil of your choice.

 

Anyone with such experience with multiple vehicles should know this; if you are the guy with the most experience and knowledge in this room, we're hosed.

Beating a dead horse get over it dude

Posted
6 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

All combustion engines burn oil, literally, by design. The cylinder walls have to remain lubricated between strokes of the piston which means the rings can't and shouldn't totally wipe the cylinder walls clean when they pass. As such, oil on the cylinder walls is present during the combustion phase and is also susceptible to combustion, i.e. burning. And that's in a perfectly healthy engine with perfectly seated rings with perfect maintenance, whether you use Valvoline or Amsoil or whatever snake oil of your choice.

 

Anyone with such experience with multiple vehicles should know this; if you are the guy with the most experience and knowledge in this room, we're hosed.

It’s very unfortunate your engines use oil mine don’t. I guess you are one of those who can’t stand that people have different experiences. I’m sure there’s plenty of people even on this website have the same experience. Most engines don’t use oil. Spark plugs would misfire, cats would clog. Vehicles wouldn’t pass smog. You should really quit while you’re behind. You’re looking like a fool. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, KARNUT said:

It’s very unfortunate your engines use oil mine don’t. I guess you are one of those who can’t stand that people have different experiences. I’m sure there’s plenty of people even on this website have the same experience. Most engines don’t use oil. Spark plugs would misfire, cats would clog. Vehicles wouldn’t pass smog. You should really quit while you’re behind. You’re looking like a fool. 

Yup hes a fool. Engines are not Supposed to burn oil, oh ask NASCAR and Indy noone adds oil at the pit stop...

Posted
3 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

All combustion engines burn oil, literally, by design. The cylinder walls have to remain lubricated between strokes of the piston which means the rings can't and shouldn't totally wipe the cylinder walls clean when they pass. As such, oil on the cylinder walls is present during the combustion phase and is also susceptible to combustion, i.e. burning. And that's in a perfectly healthy engine with perfectly seated rings with perfect maintenance.

 

Anyone with such experience with multiple vehicles should know this; if you are the guy with the most experience and knowledge in this room, we're hosed.

 

What I find far more disturbing is when I see an engines oil level slowly rise because that is NOT a natural occurrence of a mechanically sound engine and fuel system, or engine design to begin with. In one instance I sent in an oil sample to the Cat lab because its here in Alberta from a diesel tractor and sure enough it came back that it had a certain percentage of fuel dilution and I called the lab and talked about the results and he said with this particular engine it is a known common issue and that the engine does NOT like idle time even if fully warmed up as it make it worse yet for fuel dilution issues. The answer basically was to monitor it as per the level, try not to let it idle any more than I have to and ultimately change the oil more often before the diesel dilution gets to a critical point. Of course this engine in question has the idiotic EGR that makes the oil black as tar after running it for one day, thankfully it was before the dpf and def was forced onto farm equipment. I'd much rather have an engine that uses a bit of oil because its typically natural for engines to use some oil over time and that the oil does not get black instantly vs an engine that is forced to swallow soot down its throat and due to weird fuel timing for emissions purposes end up with fuel dilution in the crank case. 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, KARNUT said:

It’s very unfortunate your engines use oil mine don’t. I guess you are one of those who can’t stand that people have different experiences. I’m sure there’s plenty of people even on this website have the same experience. Most engines don’t use oil. Spark plugs would misfire, cats would clog. Vehicles wouldn’t pass smog. You should really quit while you’re behind. You’re looking like a fool. 

 

My engines use oil, yes. As do yours. 😆

 

However, you lack the ability to perform higher resolution analysis of data points in relation to your own experience. It's OK to acknowledge your blind spots or where you need to incorporate information to change your incorrect views.

 

I've got 7 vehicles in the fleet right now, two are diesel. Four of the gas engines use virtually nothing; we'll call it "nothing" but oil usage is actually non-zero, it has to be. They burn completely healthy amounts of oil for their use and design which really isn't noticeable during a typically oil change interval. That doesn't mean they don't use oil. You? You'd say they use "no oil" and it's not possible that they burn any oil. And that's simply untrue. The only vehicle that doesn't burn oil is our EV.

 

The diesels I described above. The small diesel is too new but is explained to burn oil during early mileage by the manufacturer and that matches my experience with other new diesel engines. The medium diesel burned when new and now burns acceptably normal which is almost nothing--but it's never zero.

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, riddler said:

Yup hes a fool. Engines are not Supposed to burn oil, oh ask NASCAR and Indy noone adds oil at the pit stop...

 

That's just a dumb question. Because the engines have big enough sumps to keep the engine lubricated during the race, usually 12-14 quarts. Adding oil could cost precious time, or the entire race ($ millions and millions in sponsorships) and the potential of spilled fluids leading to disqualification.

 

But that doesn't mean they don't burn oil. Burning 2 quarts isn't unusual for a 500 mile Nascar race.

Edited by Atlas
Posted
3 minutes ago, Atlas said:

 

My engines use oil, yes. As do yours. 😆

 

However, you lack the ability to perform higher resolution analysis of data points in relation to your own experience. It's OK to acknowledge your blind spots or where you need to incorporate information to change your incorrect views.

 

I've got 7 vehicles in the fleet right now, two are diesel. Four of the gas engines use virtually nothing; we'll call it "nothing" but oil usage is actually non-zero, it has to be. They burn completely healthy amounts of oil for their use and design which really isn't noticeable during a typically oil change interval. That doesn't mean they don't use oil. You? You'd say they use "no oil" and it's not possible that they burn any oil. And that's simply untrue. The only vehicle that doesn't burn oil is our EV.

 

The diesels I described above. The small diesel is too new but is explained to burn oil during early mileage by the manufacturer and that matches my experience with other new diesel engines. The medium diesel burned when new and now burns acceptably normal which is almost nothing--but it's never zero.

 

If you want to be technical. They use all fluids because you change them. But that isn’t what the thread was about. I’m not going to list all the vehicles I own or have a percentage of ownership in the family business. It’s enough. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Chuck FB said:

 

What I find far more disturbing is when I see an engines oil level slowly rise because that is NOT a natural occurrence of a mechanically sound engine and fuel system, or engine design to begin with. In one instance I sent in an oil sample to the Cat lab because its here in Alberta from a diesel tractor and sure enough it came back that it had a certain percentage of fuel dilution and I called the lab and talked about the results and he said with this particular engine it is a known common issue and that the engine does NOT like idle time even if fully warmed up as it make it worse yet for fuel dilution issues. The answer basically was to monitor it as per the level, try not to let it idle any more than I have to and ultimately change the oil more often before the diesel dilution gets to a critical point. Of course this engine in question has the idiotic EGR that makes the oil black as tar after running it for one day, thankfully it was before the dpf and def was forced onto farm equipment. I'd much rather have an engine that uses a bit of oil because its typically natural for engines to use some oil over time and that the oil does not get black instantly vs an engine that is forced to swallow soot down its throat and due to weird fuel timing for emissions purposes end up with fuel dilution in the crank case. 

 

Yep. Idle time can wash the cylinder walls and dilute the oil and add volume to it over time. On a smaller scale, the owners manuals for small diesels and gasoline direct inject engines for cars tell owners to limit idle time.

 

EGR is a different subject but I agree. 8 quarts of fresh translucent oil in a modern diesel with emissions and it turns instantly black.

 

When DI systems malfunction they can leak fuel into the oil system...not uncommon for people to see another half to full quart over full on the dipstick before they realize there's a problem. EEK

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

If you want to be technical. They use all fluids because you change them. But that isn’t what the thread was about. I’m not going to list all the vehicles I own or have a percentage of ownership in the family business. It’s enough. 

 

What? That makes no sense and nobody cares about your family business ownership stake here.

 

And yeah, I am technical. We're talking about engines on an enthusiast forum.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,903 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...