Jump to content

Rear drum breaks on 05 ados?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I was browsing the speks of an 05 silverado for the fuel tank size and noticed it said rear disk breaks. what the heck, i thought they only had disk on em. does anyone own a silverado/sierra with read drums?

 

 

 

speks

Posted
I was browsing the speks of an 05 silverado for the fuel tank size and noticed it said rear disk breaks. what the heck, i thought they only had disk on em. does anyone own a silverado/sierra with read drums?

 

 

 

speks

 

 

 

 

 

I think for 05 they went back to Drums. They had a few problems with the rear discs.

Posted

I've got an '05 GMC Crew Cab. It's got drums on the back. I've had the truck about a month and I've had to prove at least three or four people wrong. All of them said it had 4-wheel disk brakes as well. But no stopping problems so far.

 

I've lowered the back 2" with DJM shackles and added a 2 degree bell-tech shim kit, tinted the front windows and sit it on 20" Motto MT100's with 285/55R20 Goodyear Eagle GT II's.

Posted
I was browsing the speks of an 05 silverado for the fuel tank size and noticed it said rear disk breaks. what the heck, i thought they only had disk on em. does anyone own a silverado/sierra with read drums?

 

 

 

speks

 

 

 

 

The half tons went back to drum rears, the 3/4 HD's still have disc rears

Posted

http://wardsauto.com/ar/auto_gm_pickups_brake/index.htm

 

MILFORD, MI – General Motors Corp. says its ’05 fullsize pickups will be equipped with an all-new braking system that improves performance and is more pleasing to use.

 

The rub for GM engineers: Their one-step-back-two-steps-forward solution requires a bit of explanation. At first blush, the uninitiated might be convinced GM actually is cutting back on the pickups’ braking ability.

 

gm_disk_brake_060404.gif

New front disc is larger, twin-piston caliper stiffer.

When the current Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickups (internal designation: GMT800) were launched as ’99 models, GM bragged they were the industry’s first fullsize light-duty pickup trucks to come standard with 4-wheel disc brakes.

 

Until then, pickups – whose rear wheels typically don’t contribute much to the act of slowing the truck – traditionally used less-powerful, less-costly drum brakes for the rear wheels.

 

The new braking system for the ’05 Silverado and Sierra returns to drum brakes for the rear wheels, but it is not a retrograde move.

 

GM engineers, along with co-developer Robert Bosch GmbH, are leveraging their knowledge that pickups rarely use their rear brakes as hard as the fronts. They have taken the savings gleaned from using rear drum brakes and spent it on a serious upgrade of the trucks’ front brakes and other braking-system components.

 

Because the ’05 trucks’ harder-working front brakes now are considerably more powerful, GM and Bosch promise the new system delivers meaningful performance improvements, despite the return to drums at the rear.

 

Equally important, the new system, engineers say, will provide drivers with better feedback, require less pedal effort and deliver generally better overall response and “feel.”

 

Jully Burau, assistant chief engineer-fullsize trucks, says GM’s truck engineers pursued the new braking-system design because of continuous-improvement initiatives. “It’s an evolving product. We’re always driving for better quality, reliability and durability,” Burau says.

 

gm_master_cylinder_060404.gif

New master cylinder stiffer, enhances pedal “feel.”

She also says GM targeted the braking system because of J.D. Power and Associates initial-quality ratings and other consumer-clinic data that show customers believe there is plenty of room for improvement in the performance and feedback of pickup brakes – and because GM was not pleased with the Silverado/Sierra’s rating vs. rivals from Ford Motor Co., DaimlerChrysler Corp. and Toyota Motor Corp.

 

Issues most often cited include high brake-pedal effort, “mushy” feel from the pedal and the feeling the brakes don’t provide enough stopping power.

 

Fixing those problems, says Ken Hamann, director-brakes and chassis control systems, led GM and Bosch to a host of solutions that not only deliver quantifiable reductions in stopping distance and time but also generate more responsive feedback to the driver.

 

The primary hardware upgrade for the ’05 light-duty pickups is 1 in. (2.5 cm) larger-diameter front rotors and twin-piston calipers that are significantly larger and stiffer than the current twin-piston squeezers. Hamann says the larger rotor provides a 55 sq.-in. (355 sq.-cm )increase in rotor swept area, a tremendous aid in generating more stopping force.

 

The upgraded rotor/caliper components also deliver an important ancillary benefit, says Hamann. Their better stopping power means engineers could eliminate a booster previously necessary to comply with a federal safety standard that dictates the amount of allowable brake-pedal pressure in the event the braking system’s power-assist is inoperable.

 

The new brakes are powerful enough to eliminate the costly and space-consuming booster, which had to be added solely to provide extra pedal assist in the rare event of total power loss.

 

Hamann says the new brake system also includes a totally new master cylinder and booster that is stiffer and more efficient. That stiffness, combined with the extra beefiness found in the new calipers, helps to reduce the spongy feeling about which customers complain. By taking compliance out of these components, Hamann says customers will “experience more confidence with the pedal.”

 

GM engineers, in fact, developed in the early 1990s a matrix to help quantify the sometimes esoteric subjective facets of brake-system feedback. Their Brake Feel Index (BFI) assigns a vehicle a single BFI score based on a composite of weighted variables that contribute to a customer’s overall impression of the braking experience.

 

GM thought it could – and should – improve its fullsize pickups’ BFI scores, says Burau. “We’re focused on the customer interface,” she says.

 

The new system, says Hamann, registers a 41% BFI improvement vs. the ’04 brake system. GM’s numerous other GMT800-derived vehicles, including its fullsize SUVs, continue to use the current disc/disc system.

 

Hamann says the new trucks’ improved braking system will reduce stopping distance from 60 mph (97 km/h) by 85 ft. (26 m) and stopping time by 2 seconds. Meanwhile, the driver will not have to exert as much effort on the brake pedal, and the pedal will feel more responsive and deliver more of the confidence Hamann says is important to drivers, particularly when the pickup is heavily loaded.

 

As for those “new” old drum brakes at the rear, they are no slouches; Hamann says the 11.6-in. (29.5-cm) diameter drums are the largest in a light-duty vehicle.

 

But he knows the perception of returning to a less-sophisticated component is undeniable. That’s why GM and Bosch engineers point to the improved performance and feel of the new system that takes advantage of pickups’ unique braking behavior.

 

And why, Hamann says, he hopes pickup customers and auto critics try the new system before judging.

 

“They need to feel, touch and understand what we went through to make that call (to return to drum brakes),” he insists.

Posted

My 05 sierra has the drums. They WORK. I've had numerous occassions where I've had to put them to the test. You know, nice weather, spring chickens, zoning out and "OH NO...ERRRRPPPP"...the things work good.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,716
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    BDS my HD
    Newest Member
    BDS my HD
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 455 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hello hello looking forward to expanding my knowledge of the 2026 2500 HD that I just bought.   Truck has 3500 miles on it four-wheel-drive crew cab and I’m about to put a 6 1/2 inch BDS lift on it 18 x 10 -25 offset with 37’s   Already have the wheels and tires just waiting on the lift install in about three weeks   Question what surprises am I not gonna be happy with?  I’m not new to lifted trucks so I know that acceleration towing gas mileage all that is affected..   Question is those of you that have this truck this powertrain with a 10 speed Allison and have done the mods that I’m doing,,, how bad is it? Is that Allison constantly gonna be hunting for the right gear to go into? And what about towing, acceleration, fuel consumption as mentioned?    Lastly how come I can’t find any ring pinion gear set up for these axles and when could I expect to see them?   I apologize if there’s any typos I’m doing speech to text on my iPhone.    
    • I've got a 2013 2500 6.0L Flexfuel. Drove the truck earlier today with no issues. Went to run an errand tonight and noticed key fob wouldn't work. Figured battery was dead, so replaced fob batter. Still wasn't working. Grabbed my other set of keys with the other fob and that one wasn't working either. So I manually unlock truck and insert key. Interior lights come on, dashboard lights up, turn key and truck starts. Turn truck off, like a moron, and try starting again. This time no crank, no click, no nothing. Lights still come on and dash lights up, but now I'm getting a service 4wheel drive, service tire monitor, etc. Check voltage on battery and Im showing 12.2v. Throw my battery charger on it and give it 15 mins and try starting again. But still no crank no start. Decide maybe its a bad battery, run to autozone grab a new one and put it in. Same issue. Disconnect battery and let it sit for 15 mins. Try again and still nothing. I had managed to roll the windows down earlier as its a humid night, but now I can't get them to roll up. Power locks are also not working now. Then randomly I try the key again, and it fires right up. Immediately I roll up the windows as we have nothing but rain forecast this week. I shut it back off wait 30 seconds and start up again. Worked a 2nd time. So turn it off, start putting things back together. Try one more time, and back to no crank no start. And now the car alarm starts going off. Had to disconnect battery and leave it that way for the night as I don't think my neighbors would appreciate my alarm going off again tonight. Any thoughts or help would be appreciated. 
    • No one will care for you like you care for you. Do what you can for as long as you can. IMHO of course. 
    • How about them NICKS!!! 
    • Hi there.  Long time lurker, first post.    i have read the previous posts regarding the water ingress problem with this emblem.  I bought my 1500 SLT the  summer of 2025 new and after reading the MANY problems with these emblems failing I decided to install one anyways.  As per a YouTube video, I sealed ( or tried to) this sign with silicone sealant around the outer perimeter joint and the holes that were already somewhat sealed on the rear plate of the emblem.  And installed the connector assembly using dielectric grease on the connectors. The installation looked great and worked well for about 4 months……then FAILURE.  Grrrrrr…… I live in the great white north and wash my truck weekly in an automatic car wash  to keep the salt off.  Let me tell you that removing the old, failed emblem is a whole different animal than removing the OEM individual letters without removing the grill assembly. Mainly because the illuminated logo is built differently than the original letters which  you can remove the red surface lettering with a knife or some kind of blade which gives access to the tabs which hold the logo onto the grill. So I had to essentially destroyed the old emblem to remove it. Doing so killed my chance of doing somekind of autopsy on the failed , old logo.  But there was plenty of water inside when I ripped it apart.  Prior to installing the new assembly I tried it with the old harness and it works fine.   Does anyone have any insight as to where the water is getting into this emblem? I intend to seal the new logo with slow curing epoxy this time around using a syringe.  I think this newer emblem may be an updated unit which I hope GM got the vendor to fix. It has an October 2025 date on it.    If this one  fails,  I am just going to revert back to the non-illuminated letters….AFTER PULLING THE GRILL.    Any thoughts on sealing with epoxy would be appreciated. Thx!   Doug  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...