Jump to content

6.0 VERSUS 5.3


Recommended Posts

Posted

LOOKING FOR ANYONE WHO CAN GIVE INFORMATION ON WHICH WOULD BE BETTER FOR PULLING A CAMPER OR TRAILER A FEW TIME A YEAR VERSUS DRIVING TO WORK DAILY, A 6.0 OR 5.3 IN 1 2500 CHEVROLET

Posted

The 5.3L is better suited for daily driving, but is capable of towing 5-6000 lbs safely a few times a year (1/2 ton truck)... A biggier trailer would require the bigger motor but would definatly require the heavier chassis (2500 or 2500HD).

Posted

Big question is how far are you going travel, or where do you think you want to go? A 5.3L in a half ton will pull at 30ft travel trailer, but don't plan on climbing any mountians, or trips more than a few hundred miles. The drivetrain on a half ton is not made for that type of use. :D

 

I will look up a post from last fall, but I spent time doing some research before I purchased the truck I have now. In brief, if you are only going to an RV park a few hours away, and you have a moderate trailer (no 30ft with slides) go for the half ton, but order with 4:10 rear end. Therefore you will get drivability for everyday use, and better towing with the 5.3L. :cry:

 

The 6.0L is not a bad motor, it has the power for my trailer, but I tow to some NASCAR races and needed the HD to climb hills and cruze at 70mph on the highway for 500+ miles one way. I drive every day, now about 30 miles one-way to work and average 14mpg, not bad for a Big A$$ Truck. :D

 

BJ

Posted

Found it. The post was in the Gas Engine Tech someone was asking the same thing you are. Like I said, I tested and this is what I found. Let me know if you have any additional questions.

 

Link to other post

--If the link does not come up, search for "4.8 5.3 6.0"

:seeya:

BJ

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

We have towed an 18' flat bed trailer with 5 ATV's, gear, luggage and 5 people from Oklahoma to California several times with a Yukon XL with a 5.3L. The mountain passes have to be taken at about 40-45mph unless you want to try to go faster and listen to the motor running 6000 rpms. The 5.3L does'nt seem to have nearly the torque of the 6.0L or the old 350.

 

I had the 6.0L in a Silverado SS, I really liked the torque and how it towed, but didn't like the mileage. So my opinion is for a couple of times a year I would go with the 5.3L.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hey everyone, I recently had an issue with my 07 2500HD GMT900. My DRL’s stay on at all times. Right front turn and right mirror turn signal indicator stay on solid at all times. By “at all times” I mean the only way to make them go off is disconnecting the battery. I tore the headlight assemblies out, tried disconnecting the harnesses to eliminate bad wiring at the harness, I unplugged the headlight switch, no change and the mirror turn signal still stayed on. My first thoughts were : Bad bulb and/or socket somewhere, under hood fuse panel bad, bcm bad, tail light or trailer wiring problem, or some random short to power in the harness.  Possibly a bad ground but unlikely. I had a big clue in the fuse panel, it had a burnt smell. I started pulling every fuse that had to do with DRL or right turn/park lamp. Nothing made the right directional turn off but pulling the DRL2 fuse made the DRL’s go out.  After studying wiring diagrams, I found that both problems had that fuse panel in common, the bcm also controls both problems but knowing the fuse panel had a burnt smell I removed and disassembled the fuse panel and found a little corrosion on the printed circuit board.  I ordered a new fuse panel from Amazon for like $260. When it arrived I installed it, and put everything back together, the problem was fixed. I figured the fuse panel needed to be replaced anyway so that was a logical place to start. Hopefully this story helps someone in the future. Regretfully I didn’t scan for codes before I did everything.
    • That stinks. I’m sitting on the side of the road right now with the same issue. Never had an issue before taking it in for the ground strap recall. Now I’m outside of warranty and they’ll probably want $200 just to diagnose what they already “fixed”. 
    • I wonder kind of nuts and bolts they will come up with next? Jim
    • “It should be recognized, however, that there becomes a point where fuel economy oils do not make much economic sense for the end consumer—we talk about a fuel saving of ~€100 compared to a risk of €1000 Euros if the oil is too thin and causes increased engine wear rates. However, the benefit of these oils accrues to the car manufacturers. If their vehicles can save 1–2% fuel by using a special fuel economy lubricant, then that OEM can drastically reduce the amount of fines they need to pay.”   I liked this and the following paragraph as well but it’s really only touching the beginning of the benefits OEMs see from spec’ing these oils. After you factor in “out of warranty” service work and new car sales when these engines fail before their time, it’s a good racket for them. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you!
    • Too much voodoo and snake oil.   Time to go EV    😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...