Jump to content

Short driving distance bad on engine?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I was wondering if driving short distances without the engine reaching full operating temperature is bad on a engine. I always herd that heat kills engine then why is it bad to drive short distances, the engine is running cooler since it hasnt reached full operating temperature?

Posted

The problem with running engines for short durations is that byproducts of combustion start building up inside the engine and in the oil. Most notably is water vapor. In a cold engine, that water vapor will condense, and usually gets trapped in the oil. When that happens, rust and sludge develop. Sludge is your engine's enemy! Permitting the engine to reach normal operating temperature is what helps to purge these byproducts before any damage can occur.

 

As far as heat killing an engine, that would be anything over normal operating range (say 240 degrees and up). Keeping that engine at proper temperature is controlled by, of course, the cooling system, but also by keeping the oil at the proper safe level. If the oil level falls too low, it begins to rise in temperature, and as that happens, it breaks down faster. This break down in the oil can also cause sludge (like above), which can block oil passages, which increases friction, which increases heat... which is a vicious cycle.

 

If you're running lots of short trips, just be sure that the oil and filter are changed regularly. Occasional trips where you can get the engine exercised to it's optimum will also alleviate those issues as well. Once per week could be all it takes.

Posted
I always herd that heat kills engine then why is it bad to drive short distances, the engine is running cooler since it hasnt reached full operating temperature?

 

yes, its a cause and affect type of thing. You got to decide witch is worse

Posted

Just another consideration: in the past, there was always a problem with engines that had aluminum heads on iron blocks. Since aluminum expands about 20 times the rate of iron, conventional gaskets were scrubbed to destruction with repeated hot/cold cycles. The new multi-layered-metallic gaskets were developed to solve this problem, but I would still prefer to minimize these cycles. This expansion thing is also why you need to carefully tighten aluminum wheels so much.

Posted

The 'short drive' timing is also subjective. I've heard that you should be driving for at least 20 mins to get the system up to temperature. Many short haul drives resulted in mufflers rusting out pre-maturely. With the stainless steel units, it's not shown externally, but the internal components may be breaking down.

 

I'm of favour where you should at least once a week take it on the highway to burn off any lingering sludge and moisture in the system. Frequent oil changes would help too.

Posted

If you run nothing but short trips in cold weather or even in the summer where the engine does not reach full operating temperature, then frequent oil changes are a must. Running short trips is worse than running at 70mph for days on end down the interstate. As stated above the build up of sludge and acids will really do a number on the inside of the engine and keeping the oil fresh with frequent changes is required. Synthetic oil helps to keep the contaminates down but not much better than conventional oil. Running conventional oil at 2000 to 3000 mile oil change intervals would be the best rule of thumb.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...