Jump to content

2003 Escalade AWD question


Recommended Posts

Posted

It's been reported that when using engine braking down an incline in an Escalade, one does not get as much resistance as in a Tahoe in 4WD mode, and thus tapping the brakes to maintain speed is needed whereas in the Tahoe it wasn't. Is this because of a fundamental difference between AWD and 4WD?

 

Is there a way to force an Escalade into 4WD mode?

 

Thanks for advice.

Posted

IIRC, that model year Escalade uses a viscous clutch AWD system, similar (but different xfer case) than was used on the awd Astros, Syclones, and Typhoons.

 

It is not "disable-able".

 

As I understand it, is the rwd drivetrain is essentially solid as normal, but in the xfer case there is a chain drive off the driveshaft that attaches to a viscous clutch. The front driveshaft is powered by the viscous clutch.

 

How it works is the fluid in the viscous clutch has the peculiar property of becoming thicker (more viscous) as it warms and as you try to move parts through it. So it works sort of like a torque converter, but a fast-reacting one.

 

When both the input drive and the output drive of the viscous clutch are moving at the same speed (no slippage), the fluid is "runny" and there is no power transmitted so the front drivetrain is coasting. When the input and output are different, due to a traction difference between the front and rear drivetrains, the internals of the clutch begin to slide and the fluid gets really thick really fast, which couples the front driveshaft to the input of the clutch and transmits power to the front.

 

Its pretty cool technology - it engages and disengages as seamlessly as an automatic transmission shift, but still is able to transfer a significant percentage of torque to the front wheels. Best part is that no driver input is required.

 

 

I believe that some other AWD models have the ability to disable AWD using an electrically-actuated planetary gearset, but frankly, I don't know all that much about them, only what I've read on the web. I think the 2003 Escalade had a single-year transfer case that was revised on the later models.

 

 

This is all off the top of my head, so please correct me if someone has better info.

Posted
It's been reported that when using engine braking down an incline in an Escalade, one does not get as much resistance as in a Tahoe in 4WD mode, and thus tapping the brakes to maintain speed is needed whereas in the Tahoe it wasn't.  Is this because of  a fundamental difference between AWD and 4WD?

 

Is there a way to force an Escalade into 4WD mode?

 

Thanks for advice.

 

 

 

 

I had 6 Suburban's and now have an Escalade AWD, I notice no difference in towing between the trucks, and we tow large snowmobile trailers in the mountains. :sigh:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...