Jump to content

lux....non-lux bose system

michigan2500hd

Recommended Posts

michigan2500hd Senior Enthusiast

michigan2500hd

Posted
Posted

i hear people on here talking about different bose systems lux and non lux. What does this mean? How do you know which one you have?

nuke-man New Member

nuke-man

Posted
Posted

really what it comes down to is which Bose Amp you have in stalled. Y91 or Y92 are the lux amp and UQ7 is the non-lux amp. Look at the codes in your glove box to determine which one you have. Otherwise the amp is located in the center counsel if you want to look to make sure. The two amps are visually different and sound way different when installed

michigan2500hd Senior Enthusiast

michigan2500hd

Posted
  • Author
Posted
really what it comes down to is which Bose Amp you have in stalled.  Y91 or Y92 are the lux amp and UQ7 is the non-lux amp.  Look at the codes in your glove box to determine which one you have.  Otherwise the amp is located in the center counsel if you want to look to make sure.  The two amps are visually different and sound way different when installed

 

 

 

Just wondering.....if i have the non-lux could i put in a lux? would it be a direct fit and are the wiring harnesses the same? I figure its a long shot but i am a little dissapointed in the system, not sure it deserves to say Bose.

  • 2 weeks later...
5strinz Enthusiast

5strinz

Posted
Posted
really what it comes down to is which Bose Amp you have in stalled.  Y91 or Y92 are the lux amp and UQ7 is the non-lux amp.  Look at the codes in your glove box to determine which one you have.  Otherwise the amp is located in the center counsel if you want to look to make sure.  The two amps are visually different and sound way different when installed

 

 

 

Just wondering.....if i have the non-lux could i put in a lux? would it be a direct fit and are the wiring harnesses the same? I figure its a long shot but i am a little dissapointed in the system, not sure it deserves to say Bose.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, the NON lux can be upgraded to the LUX.. I did the conversion and added a TNR (touch screen anv). If you wanna do this, I can get you all the wiring diagrams. I have a BOOK of documentation including pictures.

 

BUt...this conversion isn't for the faint of heart. You will need to redistribute all the wires on each plug. The Lux amp also uses the data cable, so you will need that (read '04 and newer).

 

DAve

Wingnut Senior Enthusiast

Wingnut

Posted
Posted
Just wondering.....if i have the non-lux could i put in a lux? would it be a direct fit and are the wiring harnesses the same? I figure its a long shot but i am a little dissapointed in the system, not sure it deserves to say Bose.

 

 

 

 

You're discovering what a lot of us have.

 

Bose sucks. It's absolutely horrible to anybody with 1/2 an ear for sound. "No highs, no lows? MUST be Bose."

 

I'm currently plotting ways of getting around the B(L)ose crap in the new ride. It sounds horrible compared to the two I got rid of.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All I wanna do is a roomy-zoom-zoom and a boom-boom.

  • 1 year later...
carlpires New Member

carlpires

Posted
Posted

I have a 04 tahoe with the bose system (non LUX). Can I just buy the Y91/92 LUX amp and then install the Nav unit (with LUX)? Are the Nav systems capabilities different with LUX and non LUX?

 

Thanks

Carl

 

really what it comes down to is which Bose Amp you have in stalled. Y91 or Y92 are the lux amp and UQ7 is the non-lux amp. Look at the codes in your glove box to determine which one you have. Otherwise the amp is located in the center counsel if you want to look to make sure. The two amps are visually different and sound way different when installed

 

 

 

Just wondering.....if i have the non-lux could i put in a lux? would it be a direct fit and are the wiring harnesses the same? I figure its a long shot but i am a little dissapointed in the system, not sure it deserves to say Bose.

 

mikbor1 Enthusiast

mikbor1

Posted
Posted

Yes, you can change to a LUX amp and a LUX head unit and the system will work AFTER you change the PIN connections on the plug that goes into the amp--It is not difficult, but takes some time and patience--The NAV operations are the same for both LUX and NON-LUX--The difference is in the sound--I recommend also upgrading to a six-disc changer from a Denali or Escalade--When using the navigation, you cannot play a CD because the Nav CD must be inserted--(If you do not have a navigation system from the factory, you will also have to install the antenna under the dash--The whole dash cover has to be removed to do it correctly)

  • 3 months later...
nonextant New Member

nonextant

Posted
Posted
Yes, you can change to a LUX amp and a LUX head unit and the system will work AFTER you change the PIN connections on the plug that goes into the amp--It is not difficult, but takes some time and patience--The NAV operations are the same for both LUX and NON-LUX--The difference is in the sound--I recommend also upgrading to a six-disc changer from a Denali or Escalade--When using the navigation, you cannot play a CD because the Nav CD must be inserted--(If you do not have a navigation system from the factory, you will also have to install the antenna under the dash--The whole dash cover has to be removed to do it correctly)

 

Can you put a lux amp and lux head in a non-GM vehicle or are there other associated bits.

I found a 03 Yukon Nav unit locally and bought it for a project I'm working on, but I didn't read up on GM audio systems first. I guess I can't throw this thing on a motorcycle frown.gif

 

Does anyone know if the non-Lux version can be used without having all the GM bits?

Can I just get a LUX amp or will I need anything else?

 

Thanks for your help.

 

If there is no way to make it work, Is anyone looking for the LUX version p/n 15204335.

 

  • 2 weeks later...
BlackDawg Enthusiast

BlackDawg

Posted
Posted

I find this discussion interesting. I haver been installing stereos in vehicles for 30 years, started back in the days of 8-tracks, and over that time, I have done some pretty nice work (no body else around to toot my horn). I am not talking about stuff that is going to win awards or anything but nice matched components, great sound and with relatively little visual impact. Most systems under $5,000. When I purchased my truck, I was, and still am impressed with the sound from my Bose system. For a stock stereo in a truck, it is one of the nicest I heard. And, the best part is, I didn't have to do a thing except turn the key! Now, I'll give you that it could be improved upon, and maybe you fellas are deep into sound, which I can really appreciate, but don't you think these systems sound pretty good for stock?

 

Also, I looked up my RPO codes. It appears I have the non-lux amp (UQ7). So far no-one has answered the very first question. What is the difference between LUX and non-LUX. Only thing I haver gathered from this thread is that LUX is preferred. Any takers?

KCXLT Enthusiast

KCXLT

Posted
Posted
I find this discussion interesting. I haver been installing stereos in vehicles for 30 years, started back in the days of 8-tracks, and over that time, I have done some pretty nice work (no body else around to toot my horn). I am not talking about stuff that is going to win awards or anything but nice matched components, great sound and with relatively little visual impact. Most systems under $5,000. When I purchased my truck, I was, and still am impressed with the sound from my Bose system. For a stock stereo in a truck, it is one of the nicest I heard. And, the best part is, I didn't have to do a thing except turn the key! Now, I'll give you that it could be improved upon, and maybe you fellas are deep into sound, which I can really appreciate, but don't you think these systems sound pretty good for stock?

 

Also, I looked up my RPO codes. It appears I have the non-lux amp (UQ7). So far no-one has answered the very first question. What is the difference between LUX and non-LUX. Only thing I haver gathered from this thread is that LUX is preferred. Any takers?

 

Ok, a rough guess is, on the non-lux the HU has an amp which send to the non-lux amp which boosts the sound. The lux HU just sends the data and the Lux amp boosts that. I probably said that all wrong, but its along those lines.

  • 1 month later...
ctfzr New Member

ctfzr

Posted
Posted

Can someone help me? I have a 03 tahoe Bose non-lux(UQ7). I have a touch screen Nav from a 06(15800001) Bose LUX. What do I have to change to make this work? Or should I just sell it and get the non-lux (15800000) head unit. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 277 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • whenindoubtuseahammer
      My First Project and GMC has me stumped

      By whenindoubtuseahammer · Posted

      Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...