Jump to content

i'm definitely a newbie


Recommended Posts

Posted

whats up guys and gals? i am the happy owner of a 2005 Silverado 1500 4x4 std cab, short bed pickup. what do you think about a Fabtech 6" lift with 35"x12.5" procomp tires? good lift? good tires? i'm a new guy to the whole lifting thing, and i've had the truck since new and finally talked the wife into getting a lift for it. just got back from iraq for the 2nd time and she said we finally have the money. but any advice on this lift would be much appreciated. do you think 35" are gonna fit, and that i'll actually have 6"? if anybody has pics that would be very cool. thanks in advance.

matt

Posted

Procomp X-terrains are definately great tires for the money....I had a set of 35s on my old Z-71, and they were about 2 years old when I sold it last month, and they still had about 50% of the tread left...alot better than the mudders I had before. They weren't the greatest in the mud, but they were good as long as it wasn't deep thick ass gumbo mud

Posted

thanks bro. that puts my mind at ease about the tires. now if only someone could help me with how the lift is gonna be. i just hope that its gonna be real close to 6" and i'll be able to fit the 35x12.5's. cause i've already ordered them.

Posted

heh never fooled with anything over 2 inches on my suspension, But you should be able to fit them no problem with a 6 incher. I had a 3 inch body, and 2 inch suspension on my old truck and I fit 35 inch pro comps on the factory wheels with no rubbing

Posted

If your going to put on 35's on I would highly recommend 4.56 gears if you can afford it. It will get ya almost back to where you were stock, and it will help relief the strain on your tranny from the taller tires, so it doesn't fry your tranny.

Posted
If your going to put on 35's on I would highly recommend 4.56 gears if you can afford it. It will get ya almost back to where you were stock, and it will help relief the strain on your tranny from the taller tires, so it doesn't fry your tranny.

 

 

 

yeah thats definately a good idea..I had 3.73s and the 35s and it made my truck slow as hell not to mention it killed the gas mileage. Gears were my next mod, but I sold the truck instead

Posted

cool guys, thanks for the info. where could a guy get gears and how much would they cost. hopefully they don't have to wait till my 3rd tour in the sand box. hahaha. :driving:

Posted

In my opinion Rough Country makes the best lift for these trucks, they are the only one that addresses the weak CV axle problem (comes with racing style high angle CV axles) and they don't drop the torsion bar crossmember like others do, which gives you more ground clearance. Rough Country is also a completely bolt on lift and can be returned to stock later if needed. This is the best engineered lift I have found for these trucks hands down. And NO I am not affiliated with the company, just a consumer that enjoys a well designed product.

Posted

so i dropped my truck off yesterday at the shop and they have the whole front suspension broken down and the lift got there last night so it's all laid out. the tires are supposed to come in later today. i ended up going with fabtech, cause they recommended it highly, seeing that i'm not gonna be crazy offroading all the time and it's my daily. i can't wait to check out the rims and tires, i know that it'll be a whole lot better in person than in a book. later, matt

Posted
so i dropped my truck off yesterday at the shop and they have the whole front suspension broken down and the lift got there last night so it's all laid out.  the tires are supposed to come in later today.  i ended up going with fabtech, cause they recommended it highly, seeing that i'm not gonna be crazy offroading all the time and it's my daily.  i can't wait to check out the rims and tires, i know that it'll be a whole lot better in person than in a book.  later, matt

 

 

 

 

Post some pics when it done!!

Posted

I have done tons of research on lifting my truck and getting some bigger tires....I barley hve the money to pay for a lift and tires let alone a gear change. I have stock 3.73's so i have decided that when i am ready i am going to get a 3" suspension lift with 33" tires. I love the way it looks and i will be happy with that. I might also be able to fit in "some" car garages still haha

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

alright guys. its done, as far as pictures, i'm a computer moron. it's probably gonna take me 5 minutes to type all this. but i went with Pro Comp All Terrains. cause they come with a 50,000 mile warranty, and i ain't trying to bury my truck in mud. i'll go muddin' don't get me wrong, but i ain't insane about where i go. but it looks good. and i have the V-6 with 373's and no problems. NONE. i had a vibration when i first got it back. it would happen sporadically had hard once and soft another. so i thought it could be anything, so i started trying to find it. i did a front end alignment, balanced my tires, and cut my front rotors/changed the front pads. so that took me all day cause i did all the labor at a friends shop. well that didn't change a thing. still vibrated. so i took it to the shop that put the lift on and went and picked it up last night. they said they couldn't find anything wrong, but it doesn't vibrate anymore. so i don't know what to do. the shop pulling a fast one? magically went away? no clue. but doesn't vibrate so.... oh well.

somebody pm me and tell me how to post pics and i will. :crazy::crazy:

Posted

I know this will sound crazy, but there is another post here to back this up if you do a search on vibration. What most have found is that when you go with aftermarket wheels (I am assuming that you did) the little clips that go over tha wheel studs must be removed or they will cause the vibration you describe.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...