Jump to content

An interesting picture I took


Recommended Posts

Posted

I was out exploring some of the backroads by us this weekend, and found this old guy. From the looks of it, it is still being used fairly regularly. It has an amazingly little amount of rust for its age, and being up in the Northern Rockies.

 

I'm not sure of the model or year, but I thought someone here would know, and I thought you guys might enjoy the picture. :cheers:

 

gmc_truck_small.jpg

Click the picture for a larger version

Posted
I'm thinkin' it's maybe a '52, possibly a 2 ton

 

 

 

 

 

No newer than a 52 because they went to a one piece windsheild in 53. Tere is not much difference between 50 thru 52 models otherwise but I tend to think it is a 52 as well.

Posted

Man,I know a few guys that would loooove to have that thing to restore it :crazy:

Posted

Nice truck to restore. I believe it is a 1 ton model though based on dump bed size. Years ago in the 70's when I worked in construction driving C60 and C70 dump trucks while going to college I knew this old man that was retired did some contract hauling sometimes for extra money and he had a 59 2 ton chevy dump truck with a 2 speed axle and a 235 and he could haul 8 tons with it. It was a nice quiet stock truck that was cherry. He offer the truck to me for 800 bucks back then and I wish I had bought it and keep it all these years as it was the nicest old truck of its type I have every seen then or since.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I haven't seen diesel for less than $5.30 anywhere in my area
    • The not as clean as one would assume theme with the new engine oil, that reminds me of comments over the years with mechanics not always being so on board with filling an oil filter, not from the center anyway due to that typically being the clean side of the filter, danger of some contaminant falling into the filter if not careful but the realization now that the oil may not be as pure as one had assumed it would surely be. Yes it would be possible to fill from the small holes but that means messing with something to prop open the anti drain back valve if the filter is so equipped and not damage that valve in the process. Me, I have hardly ever prefilled an engine oil filter however I have prefilled diesel fuel filters with a filter on a fuel bulk tank and for anyone that has messed with diesel engines with filters and units that have a limited or no way of priming them, putting on a dry filter is a bad day to say the least with those crappy systems. But anyway back to not so clean engine oil, indeed perhaps its not so bad after all that I have not made a practice of prefilling oil filters.    As Grumpy Bear commented on keeping things clean, that I really have to wonder what the typical practice is at a dealer or any other shop that changes engine oil, do they make sure to wipe or wash off the oil plug and certainly if it fell into some gunk or onto a dirty floor, or that they wiped the filter mounting flange and didn't go and use some dirty rag and end up adding dirt to the inside of the head of the filter mount. Or be careless in how they stored or handled the new filter and if they were bumping into items under the vehicle with the filter opening facing up and having dirt drop right into the filter and if so right into the threaded center that is on the clean side. The top side, did they clean away the built up gunk that may be around the filler before removing the cap or to be really careful at that point that something right close to the filler hole that was hidden under the caps flange won't fall into the engine. Or did they clean the funnel or was that just laying there covered in oil from the oil change before and dust kicked up from sweeping the floor stuck to the oil and now that will go running into the next persons engine due to just not cleaning the funnel as "they won't know anyway" attitude as that young guy is more worried about taking a break so he can go outside and smoke a joint. Just random points that came to mind when I think about what some hired personnel may do that the shop foreman has no idea of or perhaps the whole attitude of some shops may be "eh ... who cares, they will never know the difference anyway".  
    • $3.69 for 87 octane.   $4.24 for Diesel in town.
    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...