Jump to content

1500 HD or a 2500HD


Recommended Posts

Posted

I was comparing specs on the 1500HD and the 2500HD Crew Cab models on Chevy.com and I am having a hard time discovering what the big difference is. THe specs for GVWR, 5'er towing, payload, ect. are the same or very close. What is the big difference, or is there a difference??

Posted
I was comparing specs on the 1500HD and the 2500HD Crew Cab models on Chevy.com and I am having a hard time discovering what the big difference is.  THe specs for GVWR, 5'er towing, payload, ect. are the same or very close.  What is the big difference, or is there a difference??

 

 

 

 

 

 

You must be comparing the gas burner 2500 HD. The Duramax would have significantly higher towing, payload, etc.....

Posted
I was comparing specs on the 1500HD and the 2500HD Crew Cab models on Chevy.com and I am having a hard time discovering what the big difference is.  THe specs for GVWR, 5'er towing, payload, ect. are the same or very close.  What is the big difference, or is there a difference??

 

 

 

The frame is physically larger on a HD, and 4.10 gears are standard.

Posted
I was comparing specs on the 1500HD and the 2500HD Crew Cab models on Chevy.com and I am having a hard time discovering what the big difference is.   THe specs for GVWR, 5'er towing, payload, ect. are the same or very close.  What is the big difference, or is there a difference??

 

 

 

The frame is physically larger on a HD, and 4.10 gears are standard.

 

 

 

 

 

4.10's are standard on the 6.0 2500HD, with 3.73's standard on the 8.1L with 4.10's as an option.

 

The 1500HD is a little lighter and may offer slightly better mpg with the 6.0L gasser.

 

DEWFPO

Posted

IIRC, the 1500HD was more or less the standard duty 2500(no longer available). Stronger frame than the typical 1500, but not near as strong as the 2500HD/3500 frame.

Posted

Yes the power train is the same when comparing the 6ltr 2500HD to the 1500HD. Same 6.0ltrt motor and same 4l80e tranny... the 1500HD come std with 3.73 rear end.

Posted

So if you're going to put 285's on it, get the 2500HD and you'll come out about right on the axle ratio.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way too big headlights (similar to a previous non-Wrangler SUV) should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crossing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...