Jump to content

SIR-GM1 Owners with NAV Touch Screen Help


deeve

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’ve got question for all you SIR-GM1 owners out there with the touch screen Nav radio. I installed a SIR-GM1 in my 2006 Yukon with factory XM/DVD/touch screen Nav system. I noticed when I hit the band button or try and use the option to switch between categories the radio will momentarily switch to the selected category before jumping back to whatever channel the radio was on when I turned on the unit.

 

Anyone else with this problem or anyone with a solution?

 

Thanks!

 

Dave

Posted

I just installed this thing and have the exact same problem. I wrote tech support and this was there BS response:

 

The Reply:

All tech support must go thru an authorized dealer. Tech support will only be provided for items purchased on this website. Contact 1800 274-0200 for dealer locator. We are unable to provide info for GMC head units. You can try swapping the unit out and check if your problem is resolved, but other than that it might be a normal function. Sorry for the inconvenience and hopefully you can get your issue resolved. Thanks DEI

 

ORIGINAL REQUEST:

I just installed a SIR-GM1 in my 2004 GMC truck. I have the factory touch-screen navigation head unit. The unit behaves as expected, with one exception...when the radio is displaying the map view and you press the BAND button, it will often will change to a different Sirius station.

 

My problem is exactly as you describe (I simplified it a bit in my email to them as too much information is a BAD THING when talking to tech support :ughdance:)

 

You can press the CD button and then BAND button in rapid succession to achieve the desired behavior (annoying, but I'll tolerate it to get rid of XM crap). If you ordered directly from DEI, PLEASE try sending them an email via support and let us know the result. My guess would be they'll eventually correct this problem if they get enough flak... and when they do, I'll be going after the new version. I bought mine at Circuit City, so there's no way in hell they'll help me :rolleyes:

Posted

Well, I have called DEI Tech Support and spoke to a tech. He first sent me a PDF with photos of the supported radio's to make sure my radio was compatible. I also swapped out my first one with new one to make sure it was not a faulty unit...it wasn't.

 

I then called tech support back and was told that it must be an issue with my radio not interpreting the data from Sirius the same way XM did. They said that because of that it pretty much is the way it is gonna be. He also suggested I call Sirius Tech Support and see if they have every heard of it, since it was a new issue to DEI. I called Sirius Tech and the basically said "I don't know" and there was nothing they could do.

 

I also emailed the DEI Tech that sent me the PDF file and asked about a fix or upcoming fix and did not hear back. Since it is my wifes car, she pretty much hates that it keeps changing channels because she does a lot of channel surfing. I am afraid until DEI fixes the problem it is gonna be back to XM for her.

 

Dave

Posted

What number did you call at DEI? I'd like to call it too, might help our cause here a bit. This appears to me to be an oversight on the part of DEI with regard to the nav systems. The system is listening for a BAND press and recalling the previously set station. On a normal (non-nav) radio, pressing BAND always results in a new source being selected, so this behavior would be acceptable. On the nav radio BAND has two functions (changing bands and switching to the tuner display).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,902
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Newest Member
    whenindoubtuseahammer
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 497 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Its no wonder you've gravitated to the oil types and brands you have in later years after trying certain brands and one being a specialty oil or at least very hard to come by up here and the other would have been a commonly found oil of the era and the vastly different outcomes as a result to using the vehicles in question the same distance for an OCI . It shows what marketing hype can do without actually having the product to back up the claims and that is no different now with the insane claims that are written on the side of a bottle of oil from some of the off the shelf oils.    What has surprised me and I was already finding this out before I bought my truck with the GDI engine, that this newer fancy technology that seemingly would suggest better fuel economy/emissions with this high pressure spray of fuel is not in reality kind at all to the engine or at least the oils life. Yet they insist on claiming long OCI with this technology just like they did with the port or similar type fuel injection systems when in reality its a step back in oil life to have a GDI system.    I think the mistake your making Grumpy is that your not sending your samples to Blackstone and getting the feel good glowing report that you can run it another 1000 or more miles and then send another sample where they say run it yet another 1000 miles and on and on it goes until your sending in something that looks a lot like road tar and then they may suggest you change your oil within the next 1000 miles 😆
    • I am guessing that engines of that design back then had a better ability to be abused and survive longer than a new design engine with the long timing chain and the overhead cams and phasers etc. But I would never guess that an engine could go that far and not fail spectacularly or at least die a slow death. 
    • In the 80's 90's I'd run Honda's 7,500 miles between changes using Red Line HP 5W20 and do it for hundreds of thousands of miles with issues. Back in the day it was an SAE 20 with the HTHS of a SAE 30 and SN add load. It was also very polar. Oxidation VOA was over 120. Besides those motors were SPFI and lean burn tech. I could have likely run it longer but never did.    We had a Toyota bought new I ran on Pennzoil's latest and greatest synthetic of the day with "Penthane". A made up word for a very low dose of PAO. Tried 7,500 mile OCI's in that Group III/VI chemistry and the rings tapped out at 90K. Rocker box wasn't as bad as the one Punch put up but it wasn't good either. Also a SPFI motor.    I'm around 3,750 across the board on these GDI monsters and the oil it tapped out by then usually on TBN/TAN crossover and color. Red Line HP Euro.    The AMSOIL SS brochures tell you to follow the OEM values for the service class but that it can be run up to 25K if monitored. I can't imagine what motor could go that distance and not tap out. I've never owned one.    Yes, I know. Lot's of people do. I'm just not going to be one of them. 
    • I knew a guy in the early 80's that bought a new Monte Carlo and ran it a 100,000 miles without ever changing the filter or the oil. Just kept adding. It looked like that inside.     
    • Good evening. I was lucky enough to get passed down to me a 2007 GMC LBZ that was my great uncle's. While the underside and rockers are more or less gone I feel like with time I can restore it to working order since it only has 110,000 miles and he put nearly every option he could get without getting the new body style since he did not trust DEF. So far I have done everything I can think of but when I put the key into the ignition nothing happens. I put 2 brand new batteries in it. Cleaned the terminals. Check all the fuses and relays and they all pass with my multimeter. I know I'm missing something that I just cant think of. The only odd thing is the OBD2 port works which makes me think its not the mega fuse. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...