Jump to content

2002 Yukon Denali NAV Question


mfarina

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wondering of I can get a Little help here

 

From what I have read on the Forum Getting a Factory Nav for a 2002 Yukon Denali is close to impossible

 

So I have decided to look into Alternative routes :cool:

 

I like the Factory GM NAV Model because it sits flush inside the dash ....

 

Does anyone know of a alternaltive NAV That is Mounted the same way?

... or had a good experience with a NAV that Pops up for a 02 Yukon

 

Sounds like the size of the Opening for the unit is important

 

Alpine is my 1st choice but I wanted to ask

 

Any help would be great :confused:

Posted

We do install aftermarket navs in that dash that go pretty flush, but the job is not friendly. The Eclipse navs above don't fit exactly, some cutting is required but do look ok if done correctly. The navs shown in the link are double din, whereas your dash is a 1.5 din size. I don't care for flip out screens, i think they look s**tty and the excess moving parts means more to go wrong.

Posted

I added a GM factory 05 touch screen to my 03 tahoe, no problems and there are a ton on ebay. If you yukon has th y91 option it should be a simple job. If not it still is not that bad.

Posted

Rstang, that was awfully nice of you.. but he has the older 1.5 DIN stereos and the GM NAV is double din. The full size GM trucks/suvs used 1.5 DIN radios up until 2002. Like this one:

chevycdsv1.jpg

 

Unfortunately the GM NAV radio will not 1.) fit into the 1.5 DIN space, 2.) communicate with the vehicles data system (because the full size GM's switched to class 2 data bus 2003), and 3.) wont even have the proper connections.

 

Im not saying the 1.5 DIN radios are bad - I had one in my old 2000 Envoy! it was nice. However, the older GM's (pre 2003) - in this case full size GM SUV's/trucks- dont have the class 2 data bus.

 

Now the Envoy/Trailblazer/Bravada had the class 2 data bus since inception in 2002. Some of GM's cars had the class 2 data bus since 2000. Just the full size got the shaft. :thumbs:

 

I was able to successfully (and very easily) upgrade the stereo in my 2002 Envoy to the GM NAV LUX unit. It came from the factory with the in dash 6 disc Bose stereo. :nono:

My install:

1000405og2.jpg

 

In the meantime Mfarina, keep checking out the forums. There are members out there who opted for aftermarket NAV's and some of them I've seen are what you are looking for (closer to the OEM look). Either that or trade up that ol' 2002 and get a 2003! :driving: lol

Posted

Guys Thanks for all the imput

 

MichEnvoyBoy Thanks for your efforts I fully understand the 2002 GM Cluster F***

Thank you for taking the time to help me :cheers:

 

I think Its Time to upgrade to the 03 or Higher

 

 

Have a Happy New Year

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • That's interesting, I assume that would add to the cost of the oil but also I was forgetting to bring up the issue of the low tension rings allowing more oil past which in turn forces the cats to have more oil additives pass through them that wouldn't otherwise so they are creating that problem and of course its all in the name of fuel economy. Mind you the other issue would be the lack of additives that fight the formation of carbon within the piston ring grooves which turn the engine into an oil burner and with in this GM forums case is your average off the shelf Dexos licensed oil, meanwhile the other off the shelf oil being Valvoline's R&P isn't licensed and the only one that is which is that certain Mobil oil that came out recently ( its not even being marketed in Canada ) and only a fraction of vehicle owners are going to be using it out of all the other oils on the shelf or the quickie lube bay that meet the Dexos spec by way of actual licensing.    Also I suspect that its an easy excuse to pool the non turbo DI engines in with the turbo DI engines and design the oil to not have LSPI issues in the most demanding engines and short change the naturally aspirated DI by not offering a higher concentration of additive package they could handle and still not be at risk of LSPI.    I wonder if Amsoil flipped the switch just lately and did whatever packaging designation at the same time as I wonder what oil formulation I would have bought in May, of course I don't know when it was packaged at the factory vs how long it was in storage at the Edmonton warehouse. I know its been said at least in the past that the big players switch over to a reformulated oil but the packaging has not changed until they make that move as well so there is that cross over time where its a new formulation in a predated formula marked package. 
    • Hmm. A real reason to not just use the odometer to determine OCI?    
    • Sad thing is that this doesn't have to be the case. LSPI can be solved without a reduction in TBN. Swap Ca for Mg.  Cats are not a issue if the OEM can get a ring and valve guide seal even at SN levels of SAPS. Dizzy is purring like a kitten with a bowl of warm milk. 200K of Full SAPS oil and zero detonation issues and nice a clean inside and out. This shouldn't be an issue. It isn't 1920.    Tell ya what AMSOIL SS is excellent at, internal cleanliness. The new formula is even a step up from their already outstanding cleanliness levels. Can't say the OEM offering is quite that clean. There marketing suggest the SS is cleaner.     That is the only defense with at shelf oil. Nothing wrong with them if you ignore the marketing and OEM 'recommended' OCI and use a thimble full of common sense. 😉 You go sir. 
    • I started with a folding cover by BAK PAC on my 2500. It went bad after close to 5 years. Bent and vinyl coming loose. Contacted BAK and they gave me a very good discount on a Revolver. Had it a number of years. Mostly outdoor storage. Some garage storage. Vinyl started to come loose. Still under warranty so they replaced to cover. Sold the 2500, bought the 1500 and got another revolver for it. Had it a couple years now and no issues. I store it indoors. Got a bit of discount when buying it as well. If you are seeing problems, contact BAK or real truck and let them know. Customer service was pretty good. But I think they changed their warranty.
    • I agree, there is no one answer fits all as every rig is different, one may be pulling some little aluminum fishing boat while another is towing a monstrosity that weighs a lot and hopefully the owner if the rig has some prior experience to know what drive mode they should choose.    It also struck me and this is from watching a few of those boat ramp escapades videos in the past, Ford being one of the vehicles that has the auto front axle hubs and sure enough its found out that one hub has crapped out and won't engage and may not have manual hubs to even select on both sides so they are on the boat ramp stuck with no four wheel drive and spinning .... they flat out need a tow to get up the ramp and deal with the vehicles new found issues. That can happen to all brands of pickup, finding out either four wheel drive or 4 low isn't working right at the time its needed it to work as some electronic crap has failed. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...