Jump to content

Dad's '84 GMC


Recommended Posts

Posted

I thought I'd post a pic of the '84 GMC that me and Elwoods' dad drives to the mines everyday.  I think these were taken in December 2000.  He asked Elwood how he could get his truck on here, so this is for you dad.    :D

 

84gmc.jpg

84gmc2.jpg

 

I've posted pics of his '76 3/4 ton Chevy and '86 3/4 ton Ram before, but for those who havn't seen them and are interested, you can see them here:  Dad's Trucks

Posted

WOW! it snows there early, its still upper 80's here near Beckley!!!! I cant stand those "I love Coal" stickers either LOL!! Cool of you to post the pics though!!

Posted
I cant stand those "I love Coal" stickers either LOL!!

Why not?

 

Coal keeps my dad in a job and resulted in everything me and Elwood had as kids and pretty much everthing they own now.  He's been working in either deep mines or strip mines for over 30 years.

 

Same for my wife's dad.

Posted
I cant stand those "I love Coal" stickers either LOL!!

I hope the "LOL" at the end of that sentence was meaning that you were being sarcastic.  Because I would hate to think that a guy that seemed so cool and lives so close by here has turned out to be a tree huggin' hippie.   ???   :D

Posted

No joke, I want a decal like that, but says "I hate Coal"!! My dad has worked in the coal mines all of his life! I just hate the effects of coal! The big companies come in and tear down complete mountains just to save an almighty $, The coal could be deep mined but would cost more so they just tear up our state, and when they get all the coal from that spot they just leave! They dont live here so they dont care about us! Its sad how the companies have people and employees brainwashed!!! Coal trucks also tear up our roads and cause accidents! And they show on TV how the truckers say they are going to lose their job if they cant haul so much and stuff! That just goes back to the big coal companies trying to squeeze out another buck, truckers should be paid by the hour not by the load, the truckers should stand outside of the company big shots house, not the state capital! I am not against them raising the weight limit if they enforce it! I could go on and on but will stop now!!!!

Posted

"I'm just an old chunk of coal, but I'm gunna be a diamond someday...." hehe a little John Anderson to lighten the conversation.....

 

Gig'em Ags!!  :D

Posted
No joke, I want a decal like that, but says "I hate Coal"!! My dad has worked in the coal mines all of his life! I just hate the effects of coal! The big companies come in and tear down complete mountains just to save an almighty $, The coal could be deep mined but would cost more so they just tear up our state, and when they get all the coal from that spot they just leave! They dont live here so they dont care about us! Its sad how the companies have people and employees brainwashed!!! Coal trucks also tear up our roads and cause accidents! And they show on TV how the truckers say they are going to lose their job if they cant haul so much and stuff! That just goes back to the big coal companies trying to squeeze out another buck, truckers should be paid by the hour not by the load, the truckers should stand outside of the company big shots house, not the state capital! I am not against them raising the weight limit if they enforce it! I could go on and on but will stop now!!!!

Not all of that coal can be deep mined, some of the best is ruined in the process of deep mining.  And yes they are trying to save money, because they are a business just like any other business that wants to save.  The more you save the more you make.

 

The people building Wal-Marts all over the state and logging the mountains leave it looking worse than coal companys do, and the run-off water from these places are tens times worse than from strip mines.  But no one complains about that.

 

Stopping the coal business will have a trickle down affect that will  cost

 

many more people in the state to lose their jobs as well.  I guess people just want the entire state to be a tourist attraction and we can all be tour guides for the river hippies.

 

I'll stop now, before I get upset or offend anone further,

Posted

Posting a picture of his dad's truck was a nice thing for Tom to do. I have to fight the "tree huggers" everyday in my job with a paper company. They don't understand that paper companies don't chop down redwoods that are centuries old. We plant 10 trees for every one we cut. It is a renewable resource, a crop just like any other. How can anyone possibly believe that paper companies want to run out of trees.

 

I posted this just to say that every industry has critics. But just let those critics try to live without coal or paper or other things they find offensive.

 

Tell your dad I like his pride in his industry, and I like the pride his sons have in him that makes them defend him.

 

I love coal !!!

Posted
Its sad how the companies have people and employees brainwashed!!!

I'll end this by quoting my previous post! And hopefully we can go on talking about trucks and such without letting this interfere!

Posted

I'll end this with aone of my favorites quotes as well.

Treehuggers. Let the b@$t@rd$ freeze in the dark!!  :)

 

Then I will continue to talk to you about trucks all you want; because that's the great thing about this country we can all have our opinions and express them.   :D

Posted
Wal-Marts

thats the real problem.  we have them everywhere.  their like an infection.  we have targets and k-marts too, but only a handful and the k-mart looks like it could go under any day now.

Posted

hmm, sorry for seeming ignorant, but what all is coal used for in this day in age... beside backyard's grilling(reason enough to mine coal :D )

Posted
hmm, sorry for seeming ignorant, but what all is coal used for in this day in age... beside backyard's grilling(reason enough to mine coal :D )

I've never heard of people grilling with coal, maybe charcoal, but not coal.  Alot of it goes to big industries such as Steel Mills, factorys, and auto makers.

Posted

Also a lot of coal is used in power generation, but that is mainly western coal, largely cause it's somewhat easier to get at, and less "damaging" to the environment - they say.

 

Charcoal is carbonized wood, BTW.

 

Oops, my original thoughts, which are on-topic:  That truck looks in great shape for it's age - those models were durable, and I still like that general shape best!

 

Because of my geology background and the fact that I grew up in coal mining country, maybe I can weigh in here a little w/ my 2 cents.  (Sorry if a little long - and off-topic kinda)

 

There was a term used for many decades, "king coal", and it was descriptive as coal really helped build this country into the powerhouse it is now.  As a necessary consequence many families have multiple generations of coal miners, especially in the Appalachians.  Coal mining, and associated industries provided the sole economic life-line for millioins, literally, so for this reason alone I can relate to and understand why there are "I Love Coal" stickers.  This is true in many areas of the nation that have their economies dependent on 1 or 2 large industries, especially in what are now termed "environmentally sensitive" industries, BTW.

 

I have seen firsthand what largely unregulated strip mining has done to the beautiful WV country side in the last century, and it is not pretty (please read on before you decide to flame away  :thumbs:  ) . And even though much of this land has been "reclaimed", much long-term damage has been done to the water table, drainage basin hydrology and the ecosystem.  Will it recover? Of course, given enough time.  Now, do we necessarily blame the coal miners - absolutely not!  Do we blame the coal company operators and owners?  Maybe a little, but they were still doing their jobs, and the nation needed the coal.  Can we really lay blame on anybody - probably not, but we can learn from it and set *reasonable* goals to get the energy, and not completely trash the surroundings.  This is being done now very well in the paper and wood product industry - it's called sustainable harvesting, whereas, and this occurred in virtually every forested part of this country in the last 100 - 200 years, the old forestry practices was pretty much slash and burn and clear cut.

 

My experience is that if these "table top" mining operations are conducted with an eye to preserving the eco-system, and then reclaim the approximate contours of the land, minimal damage has been done - probably less than the wal-mart, shopping mall type of mountain levelling!!

 

Geez, my post kinda turned into a rant.  I will never be a tree hugging eco-terrorist, as these people are way out in left field, and not in touch w/ reality, but I think it's possible to support the economy well, and not trash the planet in the process.   :)  :thumbs::D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
    • This landing is worse than most. Patchy blacktop with washouts, soft gravel/sand at bottom that washes out with every heavy rain. I tell everyone to put it in 4WD. A lot of them think they can pull out their trailer in 2WD. They end up digging a hole and then putting it in 4WD.  The lake is a pristine lake and has a lot of money on it. There are several wake boats and lot of large tritoons. The people with the money don't want it improved because they don't want more traffic.    Boat Landing 1.jfif Boat Landing 2.jfif Boat Landing 3.jfif
    • How wide are your rims?   Toyo specs 8.5-10.0-11.0 inches. My thought would be rim might be pulling the tire inwards creating a center that is more pronounced.    I also noticed that the spec sheet says max 65psi. So you could be right lowering the pressure to ~40 psi. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...