Jump to content

The Breaks On My 07 Nbs Sux!


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have 17K miles on my 07 NBS and I need a brake job. I took it in after about 6 months because the breaks were squeaking. They turned the front discs and I got one block down the road and it turned out it was the rear breaks that were the problem. I can't believe GM put drums on the rear of these trucks. 32K for a new truck you would think they could do a little better. From what I've seen most others are putting discs all the way around.

Just normal braking is awful. The breaking is not smooth and the truck jerks as you brake. Anyone else having break problems.

Posted

My brakes have been fine. They squeak a little for a minute or two when they've set out in the cold but other than that, they've been flawless so far.

Posted

Same here, I haven't had any problems with my brakes, I actually think they are better than most. Sure, 4 wheel discs would be nice, but drum brakes have been around for some time, and they still do the job.

Posted

I have the four wheel discs. I do feel as though they could be a bit better, even for a 6000 lb. truck. Having said that, I certainly don't think they're bad, and they are very quiet.

Posted
I thought it was the disc brakes that gm had a problem with wearing out too quickly, or was that on previous models?

 

Yes, up to 2004 I understand. In 05 they went back to drums on the back. Seems the discs were filling up with junk thrown up by the front wheels, calipers were seizing, and discs were wearing out in 20000 miles. Drums have the clever design feature of being fully enclosed. Apparently, people still drive their trucks on dirt roads or use them for work. In snow country the added problem is salt/sand/crud getting flung by the front wheels in the direction of the rear ones, and gunking up the rotors/discs.

 

I have absolutely no problems with the brakes on my 05. That truck stops on a dime and those brakes have saved the lives of quite a few deer!

Posted

Brake issues here. Feels like the rotors are warped, and my front wheels are constantly black with brake dust. Just haven't gotten around to bring it in to the dealer to get looked at.

Posted
My brakes have been fine. They squeak a little for a minute or two when they've set out in the cold but other than that, they've been flawless so far.

 

Hey Daddy,

 

Have I mentioned lately that I have 4 wheel disc brakes? :lol:

 

My 2000 also had 4 wheel disc brakes and after 6 years and about 70K miles, the rear discs did need replacing due to corrosion. 4 wheel brake job with all new rotors (I did them all) cost me about $600. Other than a crappy parking brake in my 2000, I had no complaints whatsoever. One of the reasons I went with the Vmax was to get 4 wheel disc brakes. Drum brakes need to go the way of the dinosaur (and the carburator) IMO.

Posted
My brakes have been fine. They squeak a little for a minute or two when they've set out in the cold but other than that, they've been flawless so far.

 

Hey Daddy,

 

Have I mentioned lately that I have 4 wheel disc brakes? :lol:

 

My 2000 also had 4 wheel disc brakes and after 6 years and about 70K miles, the rear discs did need replacing due to corrosion. 4 wheel brake job with all new rotors (I did them all) cost me about $600. Other than a crappy parking brake in my 2000, I had no complaints whatsoever. One of the reasons I went with the Vmax was to get 4 wheel disc brakes. Drum brakes need to go the way of the dinosaur (and the carburator) IMO.

 

 

eh, I don't know about that vmax. Just check out some of the responses in this thread. Afterall, it does make logical sense that the drums protect from corrosion and/or build up.

 

I have drums on the rear and have no complaints at all.

 

Of course my previous truck being a Ford Ranger with the ability to stop on a dime (because it weighed almost nothing) I was a bit spoiled.

Posted
My brakes have been fine. They squeak a little for a minute or two when they've set out in the cold but other than that, they've been flawless so far.

 

Ditto here...

Posted
eh, I don't know about that vmax. Just check out some of the responses in this thread. Afterall, it does make logical sense that the drums protect from corrosion and/or build up.

 

I have drums on the rear and have no complaints at all.

 

Of course my previous truck being a Ford Ranger with the ability to stop on a dime (because it weighed almost nothing) I was a bit spoiled.

 

I hear what your saying but why doesn't every other mfr have corrosion issues with rear discs then? I believe GM is the only mfr still using rear drums on anything.

Posted
I thought it was the disc brakes that gm had a problem with wearing out too quickly, or was that on previous models?

 

Yes, up to 2004 I understand. In 05 they went back to drums on the back. Seems the discs were filling up with junk thrown up by the front wheels, calipers were seizing, and discs were wearing out in 20000 miles. Drums have the clever design feature of being fully enclosed. Apparently, people still drive their trucks on dirt roads or use them for work. In snow country the added problem is salt/sand/crud getting flung by the front wheels in the direction of the rear ones, and gunking up the rotors/discs.

 

I have absolutely no problems with the brakes on my 05. That truck stops on a dime and those brakes have saved the lives of quite a few deer!

 

 

Very funny. :lol: Mean it.

 

The brakes on GMT900 is one of its most impressive features IMO. I have the rear drums and w/only 11K miles and I may be in for it soon, but for now, braking in this thing is a smooth as any vehicle I have ever owned, cars included.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...