Jump to content

How Do You Like Your 4.8l


Recommended Posts

Posted

I get 10 mpg towing a 6x12 trailer totally about 3k lbs around the city, and thats with 3.23 ratios. I want to switch to 3.73's soon. Fuel mileage is a laughable selling point for a v8 engine imo.

 

Truck is a 08 Sierra CC, I wish mpg was the only thing I could complain about this truck :M16:

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I had a 2000 Sierra with a 4.8... Tranny and rear dif both went, motor lasted to 415,000 km when I sold it.. Not that great on gas, kicked down constantly in overdrive, especially in a high wind or uphill

Posted

The 4.8 is a very capable engine as long as your not doing frequent heavy towing. I wanted to get a Sierra crew cab for as cheap as possible when I was looking for a new truck. Not to mention I am getting close to 19-20 MPG cruising the interstate at 65 mph. Mine is a 2009 so it has the 4 speed transmission, which will downshift a lot when climbing hills. It would be perfect with a 6 speed transmission.

Posted

Our new command vehicle at the fire dept is a 2012 4.L and my personal truck is a 2012 LTZ with the 6.2L and what a diff. That 4.8l is a dog for me and way underpowered. Makes me love my 6.2L even more. I have that motor becasue I pull a boat every weekend.

Posted

4.8 is good, but take it easy its not a dump truck

Posted

From everything I've heard from those with the 4.8L, it's a good engine and lasts as well as the 5.3L. On the flip side, it doesn't get any better gas mileage and hte re-sale tends to be lower on 4.8L trucks than 5.3s. So, the benefit is the $800 savings up front but more than lost on the back end plus less towing/hauling capabilty. An equation that doesn't add up for me but still a fine engine.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...