Jump to content

Torque Management And My 4l60e


Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm new to the GMT800 platform. Up until a week or so ago the newest Chevy I've had was a '90 1500 with a 350/5sp. (other than my wife's '98 Regal GS but that don't count)

 

The first thing I noticed with the 5.3L in my 2005 Tahoe 4x4 is that it has decent power once it's rolling but it's weak off the start. As I mentioned in another thread, it almost feels like it's surging until it reaches 20 or so MPH. Hell, even a Hyundai pulled away from me from a light. Then I found this board and I've been reading through tons of threads over the last few days and came across terms like "Torque Management" and "Abuse Management" and that you can remove this nanny feature with a tune. That sounds pretty good to me, but then I saw this thread about the sun gear stripping in the 4l60e transmission:

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=83260

 

I see tons of tuning threads so I know it's pretty common to do, which is encouraging. At least I know that all the information I will need is just a few clicks away right here. (I'd be happy if this Tahoe had half as much low end torque as my '90)

 

However, I don't see any of those threads addressing the weak point in the transmission. Do you guys that tune just do it and not worry about the stress on the sun gear? Or is this problem less common than I'm percieving? Should I just do the damn tune and not worry about the sun gear?

Posted

I don't think you mean the sun gear you are probably seeing posts about the reaction sun shell. A tune should not affect the shell in my experience. I don't think I've ever seen a tune affect that trans with that engine. The shell gets killed by reverse dropping, nobody thinks they do it and everyone does. More power has little effect on the shell.

Posted

Cool, thanks for the reply. I saw that it was mostly caused by going into reverse while still moving forward, but since it's also used during 1-2 shifts and 3-4 shifts, I was worried that it would stress it if there was more power going on during those shifts.

Posted

So is the whole purpose of the reaction sun shell to make smoother shifts, and the quicker the shift the less it's even active?

  • 5 years later...
Posted

I have a 2005 Chevy 1500 5.3L. I went to pull my boat out of the water and couldn't go anywhere. The tires didn't spin I had little to nothing for rpm's. Is this a result of torque management? My boat is just a small fiberglass fishing boat and should be easily pulled from the water with my truck. Any ideas would be most helpful.

Posted

No, it's not due to TM. Have you checked for any stored codes? How does the truck drive and start other times?

Posted

Well abuse mode pulls timing off the line when it senses abuse it cuts the fuel to 1/2 the cylinders. Thats probably a contributing factor. And i noticed for best acceleration dont floor it, but punch it 3/4 of the way off the line. Try to clean the TB that helped me. Some more food for thought is ETC. I've drive. Many gmt 800's and i do tell the difference from drive by cable and wire.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I have a tuned truck and vette servo with a stock trans that has over 190k on it. 36k of those miles are with the tune and servo, trans is still shifting great and the fluid is bright red with no burnt smell to it. That dead spot you feel off the the line is actually a different tune called fuel enrichment. The truck doesn't seem to move till about 2800-3000rpm right. That is because you have to be at full throttle for three seconds before you get the correct amount of fuel needed at full throttle. What is happening is, you are asking the computer for full power but the computer isn't giving it to you until it reads full throttle for 3 secs. This alone cuts 20lbft of torque and about 10hp in that 3 sec period. It plays into TM but is mostly there to help fuel economy. So, from a stop light, and you want to leave the line fast, 1/2 throttle it until you pass the stall speed on the converter, then mat the throttle. truck will be much faster and will avoid the fuel enrichment tune in the computer.

 

Now, for the torque management , I do not know how much TM the tuner took out but every now and then, I can feel the TM cut in when driving. I feel it most when I turn from a side street onto a main street. Turning onto the main street slow, the guy behind me is closing fast, I hit the throttle (1/4 throttle to 1/2 throttle). Before hitting the go pedal, the trans has already asked for a shift with the 1/4 throttle calculation. Once I hit the pedal harder, the trans shifts early into second , the truck bogs down for a second, then the truck starts to go but still in 2nd gear. When it does this, I can actually feel the TM cutting in to avoid the full hit of power on the trans. most of the time with the tune, my truck will stay in 1st and run but every now and then, it will do this.

 

The guy who tune my truck says the worst thing for the trans is the 4-2 downshift. It wears the band out bc it has to unlock the band, then the clutches, then re lock the band which has to stop the sunshell to give you second. At highway speed, with 2.5 ton truck, that is a lot of stress on the trans. Another thing he said is if you truck hits the rev limiter on the 2-3 shift, that is the kiss of death for the trans. Also, a lot of people keep saying that the trans is hit or miss on life span. I know of people who baby their truck and the trans quit before 100k. Then there are people,like my dad and myself, who beat on the trans and it will last 150k+.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,739
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    JimmyB4
    Newest Member
    JimmyB4
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 728 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’ve own several successful businesses. I’ve bought homes and lived in different states. I’d witness several generations buy homes and survive in different economic circumstances. You get awful sippy when people have different experiences than you do. You live a life. I’ve lived a life. It seems our experience has been different. You can point out generalized statistics. Some people learn how to thrive when the odds are against them. Living in different states does make a difference in a persons quality of life and economic outcomes and opportunities. That’s a fact Jack. It’s my truth, my life. Hard work and long hours the right environment made my families life easier. And yes moving to a different state increased the odds of that happening. Stats are generalized. People who thrive don’t make excuses. They beat the odds. Others get mad and point to those statistics. I guess that’s you. My post pointed out how you helped people beat the odds. Somehow your panties got in a wad. Go figure. 
    • Good question, I don't remember for sure but I believe it was the HD. I will check and get back to you.
    • Point of the post sir was that while both wages and cost are rising EVERYWHERE; the cost is rising faster EVERYWHERE than the ability to buy EVERYWHERE. We're not going down the location rabbit hole. I'm aware of what economic migration is. I've lived in four states including Texas.   It's what "Purchasing Power" means.   I'm not telling you what I think. I'm telling what the government, your government, data shows.   It wasn't an argument. It wasn't a suggestion. It was a statement of FACT. You are absolutely entitled to your own opinion. Your not entitled to your own facts. If you and I were, they wouldn't be facts.    fact /făkt/   noun Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. "an account based on fact; a blur of fact and fancy." Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed. "Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact." A real occurrence; an event. "had to prove the facts of the case." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik   If you'd like to disagree call your Senator or Representative and let him know his departments are in error. But you and I? We are not doing this. 
    • Probably a one and done post, but do you have a CEL on the dash? Was having issues with my transmission, fortunately only a week, and it turned out to be the transmission harness. Valve body was in good shape, so new harness with all the sensors attached, new fluid, and filter. Seems to have worked so far?
    • Two interesting tidbits of information which are NOT related were just released.   One, regarding the possible thrust bearing issues / engine failures with the 3.0. Demonworks just did a segment in which they believe they may have found "a" or "the" cause of thrust bearing failures: A missing thrust bearing. If the engine doesn't have all its thrust bearings from the factory, the missing bearing can cause extra play which ends up destroying a nearby thrust bearing which then sends metal through the engine.       Of other importance, Lake Speed Jr released some interest information regarding oil weight selection for the 3.0. Comparisons of:   AcDelco 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w20 Dexos D Mobil 1 ESP x2 0w30 Mobil 1 ESP x4 0w40. Mobil Delvac 5w40   Spoiler alert: The Mobils are PAO Ester -base and the ACDelco is a Group III base. Mobil shows lower wear in their tests for similar weights. Additive packages between 20-30-40 weight ESP's appear to be the same, but only 0w20 is Dexos D licensed. Wear is even more reduced with 30 and 40 weight ESP although all perform very well and resist shear and provide very similar viscosities within temperature operating ranges in the 3.0.   There are even more surprises, so just go watch it.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...