Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Can someone tell me the part i need for a 2007 Silverado, 4WD Crew Cab? I ordered what i thought was the correct part....AC Delco 214-2149 and it only had one port whereas the one i have on the truck now has two and is slightly smaller. I'm not very mechanically inclined but can change this out once i know i have the correct part to work with. thanks much. great site and info here.

 

Mike,

 

The part you ordered will work fine, just did the same to my 07. I just zip tied the breather hose out of the way. Started the truck up, cleared the code and so far so good. You only need the part, hose, two hose clamps a screwdriver and a knife or razor. It took all of ten minutes.

 

Gil

 

post-103799-1319824753_thumb.jpg

 

post-103799-1319824837_thumb.jpg

post-103799-1319824753_thumb.jpg

post-103799-1319824837_thumb.jpg

post-103799-1319824753_thumb.jpg

post-103799-1319824837_thumb.jpg

post-103799-1319824753_thumb.jpg

post-103799-1319824837_thumb.jpg

Posted
Will this part fit on an 09 1500? My truck has 40k miles, and is out of warranty, so so if this part will work...I'll be a happy guy. Got the P0449 code yesterday, cleared it, and it came right back on the first start up.

I just put the 214-2149 on my 07 Sierra (new body). It also has 40k on it. $31 all in. I bought 3' of 5/8 heater hose and had 18" left over. Cleared the code with a code reader, and so far it has stayed off. You will just need to find the right curve for the hose. Any repair that I can do with a screwdriver and a knife is for me.

 

I have the same issue on my '08 now. The part number calls for the entire kit, solenoid and vent and I only need the solenoid. My part has two hose connections, one from the canister and 1 to the vent. It looks like this part you mention only has one outlet is that correct? My part is $86 at Rock Auto, this other part is less than $20 and I'd like to go that route if possible.

 

 

Ok, I got my part at the dealer. For the NBS, mine is an '08, it is 214-2236 and cost me about $30. I got a couple feet of 5/8 heater hose and some clamps and you can see what I did below in the pics. The reason for doing this is that you have to cut the OE lines (plastic) to get the old part out. IMG_4084.jpgIMG_4085.jpg

 

 

Thanks for the pics RAT-ON. Your pic and description made it easier to find once I knew what and where I was looking for. I ordered the P/N 214-2149 thru Amazon for $13 with free shipping. I'll post an update once I install it. Thanks again.

  • Like 1
  • 7 months later...
Posted
***IMPORTANT INFORMATION YOU MUST READ*****

 

Ok everyone, listen up....If you have a 04 and newer silverado, with a failed evap vent solenoid, you have to read this info. Do not pay $100+ for this part(actually $150.00 at the dealer). The following part numbers associated with this part have been gm#19207763,19152349, and AC DELCO #'s 214-2082 costing over $100.00 for the modified part. This is for the modified part, with the relocation of the filterbox, and the added hose that seperates the two. No one at Gm will tell you this, but this same part, that was origionally on your silverado, is also used in the 2006 Suburban. It will be an identical replacement for what is ON YOUR TRUCK, and the cost is $24.04 AT THE DEALER. I know this because I own a 2006 silverado, and a 2006 suburban. Looked at the suburban when the part went bad on the silverado(from overfilling the tank)and bingo, same part. Ask a parts person at GM, and they will tell you otherwise, but they are lying to you. Bought the suburban part today part # 25932571 (GM #) and everything is identical, right down to the numbers stamped on the part itself. Took the part off my silverado, put the replacement on (which gm told me is not the right part), cleared the codes, and bingo no more light after 3 consecutive starts...... Why, is it that GM feels we need to pay the price for something they did wrong???? And moreso, lie to us, telling us the $150.00 part is our only choice to fix the problem. My truck went 40K miles with the origional part, and probably only went bad because of my own stupidity in overfilling the tank, whay would I not just want to spend $24.00 to put on the same part, that will probably go the rest of the life of the truck with no tank overfills???? I say CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT FOR EVERYONE THAT HAS BEEN SCAMMED INTO PAYING THE RIDICULOUS PRICE that GM is trying to suck out of us.....Please pass this on to the world, and every forum you can...Get the word out....Let the parts people at GM know we are on to their BS, and they can't take advantage of us like they have.....

I just wanted to say that when my evap solenoid (p0449) went bad I found this very post, and I am so thankful that I did. I went to my stealership handed the attendant a paper with the part number you mentioned. He ofcourse tried to sell me the $150.00 kit, but I declined. Changed the part and saved myself $120.00. :D Hopefully that will cover the ticket I got for out of date inspection. :sleep:

 

 

 

 

:fingersx: After finding this Forum, I was determined not to spend alot of cash.. I crossed P/N# 25932571 to a BWD - Vapor Canister Purge Valve P/N: CPV16 at my local Orielly's Auto Parts. Couldn't believe; it's the same freaking part. For $23.99 plus tax counldn't be any better than this. No more P0449 or P0445 codes.. Whoohoo.. That ya'll.. :driving:

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Can someone please help me. I was directed here from Chevyforum. I have a 2006 Chevy Crewcab with the 4.8.

I purchased the evap vent came with 2 pieces the canister and a little vent. I paid 100 for it at gmpartsonline. reading this thread has confused me with everyone talking about different years and models. Can someone tell me what parts i need to get preferably the 28$ parts for another model chevy that will also work for my truck Please.......

 

 

Thank you in advance

Posted

***IMPORTANT INFORMATION YOU MUST READ*****

 

Ok everyone, listen up....If you have a 04 and newer silverado, with a failed evap vent solenoid, you have to read this info. Do not pay $100+ for this part(actually $150.00 at the dealer). The following part numbers associated with this part have been gm#19207763,19152349, and AC DELCO #'s 214-2082 costing over $100.00 for the modified part. This is for the modified part, with the relocation of the filterbox, and the added hose that seperates the two. No one at Gm will tell you this, but this same part, that was origionally on your silverado, is also used in the 2006 Suburban. It will be an identical replacement for what is ON YOUR TRUCK, and the cost is $24.04 AT THE DEALER. I know this because I own a 2006 silverado, and a 2006 suburban. Looked at the suburban when the part went bad on the silverado(from overfilling the tank)and bingo, same part. Ask a parts person at GM, and they will tell you otherwise, but they are lying to you. Bought the suburban part today part # 25932571 (GM #) and everything is identical, right down to the numbers stamped on the part itself. Took the part off my silverado, put the replacement on (which gm told me is not the right part), cleared the codes, and bingo no more light after 3 consecutive starts...... Why, is it that GM feels we need to pay the price for something they did wrong???? And moreso, lie to us, telling us the $150.00 part is our only choice to fix the problem. My truck went 40K miles with the origional part, and probably only went bad because of my own stupidity in overfilling the tank, whay would I not just want to spend $24.00 to put on the same part, that will probably go the rest of the life of the truck with no tank overfills???? I say CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT FOR EVERYONE THAT HAS BEEN SCAMMED INTO PAYING THE RIDICULOUS PRICE that GM is trying to suck out of us.....Please pass this on to the world, and every forum you can...Get the word out....Let the parts people at GM know we are on to their BS, and they can't take advantage of us like they have.....

 

 

I called gmpartsonline.net and i ordered part # 25932571 (GM #) it listed for 26$ but because I ordered the previous part the one for the silveraldo on the internet they gave me the internet discound which was 17$ and he is overnighting it to me for free. I am going to install it this weekend. I will let you guys know how it works out.

 

 

Why do you install the vent can in a different location?

  • 2 months later...
Posted

After reading several forums about emission codes PO 455 & PO449 general conscenus is the EVAP vent solenoid goes bad due to over filling the tank. My tank has only filled maybe 3 times since 04 when it was new. Any thoughts on maybe the fuel cap it self is actually bad?

 

Also, do you have to loosen and lift the bed to make enough room to remove the solenoid? On the 2004 standard long bed trucks it is between the bed and the cab?

Posted (edited)

You can have the cap pressure tested. Look on the back of the tank for the cylindrical part. It also goes bad to dirt being ingested into the part

 

 

DSCN1469.jpg

Edited by txab
Posted

I have heard the cap can be pressure tested. I called a few parts places but they didn't do it. Any suggestions where it can be done?

 

Thanks for your help.

Posted

Does your state require vehicle inspections. If so, many states require the cap to pass inspection. You might try there. Or simply try a new cap. But I'd bet your problem is not the cap

Posted

Maryland does require emissions testing. When I went there to extend the due date I asked them if they could test the cap. They wouldn't do it because the cap is not tested on the 04 and they had no base line to know if it was working or not.

 

I think you're correct that most likely it is not the cap. Thanks for the feed back.

Posted

That's crazy. Are you the original owner? To your knowledge has the part pictured above been replaced before? If so, it may have the upgraded part and installation.

 

One other thing, it could be a wiring problem. This has been reported by several members

 

214-2082.jpg

Posted

I am the original owner and that part had not been replaced. I only purchased the solenoid valve itself and not the kit. Since the truck is not subjected to being overfilled or dusty conditions I am rolling the dice. The line to the canister was dry also.

 

I did manage to replace the old solenoid with the new one yesterday. In all the sites I have researched for this isssue I do not recall anyone saying they found the solenoid to be split or cracked but that is how I found mine. It looked as if it was filled with water, froze, expanded and split.

 

The engine light went out after about 2 miles of driving and I think I am good to go.

 

Once again thanks for your imput. I try to do as much of my own work as I can and if not for these web sites and the knowledgable that participate on them I wouldn't do nearly as much myself as I do.

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

***IMPORTANT INFORMATION YOU MUST READ*****

 

Ok everyone, listen up....If you have a 04 and newer silverado, with a failed evap vent solenoid, you have to read this info. Do not pay $100+ for this part(actually $150.00 at the dealer). The following part numbers associated with this part have been gm#19207763,19152349, and AC DELCO #'s 214-2082 costing over $100.00 for the modified part. This is for the modified part, with the relocation of the filterbox, and the added hose that seperates the two. No one at Gm will tell you this, but this same part, that was origionally on your silverado, is also used in the 2006 Suburban. It will be an identical replacement for what is ON YOUR TRUCK, and the cost is $24.04 AT THE DEALER. I know this because I own a 2006 silverado, and a 2006 suburban. Looked at the suburban when the part went bad on the silverado(from overfilling the tank)and bingo, same part. Ask a parts person at GM, and they will tell you otherwise, but they are lying to you. Bought the suburban part today part # 25932571 (GM #) and everything is identical, right down to the numbers stamped on the part itself. Took the part off my silverado, put the replacement on (which gm told me is not the right part), cleared the codes, and bingo no more light after 3 consecutive starts...... Why, is it that GM feels we need to pay the price for something they did wrong???? And moreso, lie to us, telling us the $150.00 part is our only choice to fix the problem. My truck went 40K miles with the origional part, and probably only went bad because of my own stupidity in overfilling the tank, whay would I not just want to spend $24.00 to put on the same part, that will probably go the rest of the life of the truck with no tank overfills???? I say CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT FOR EVERYONE THAT HAS BEEN SCAMMED INTO PAYING THE RIDICULOUS PRICE that GM is trying to suck out of us.....Please pass this on to the world, and every forum you can...Get the word out....Let the parts people at GM know we are on to their BS, and they can't take advantage of us like they have.....

 

 

 

The message above is 100% correct. Part Number 25932571 is a cheaper replacement for 19207763. I ordered via Amazon.com and paid $12!!!

 

I own a 2006 Chevy Silverado LT and I've played this P0499 error twice now. The first time my truck was under warranty and the dealer did the modification using P/N 19207763, which replaced the existing Evap. Solenoid with a smaller sized one, which employs an extra hose with a "breather" attachment. If you look up P/N 19207763, you'll see a solenoid and breather, which can cost up to $68 (Amazon.com) or $120 from Advance Auto.

 

Three years later (today), I got the P0449 error again. Did little research online and decided to go with the quoted message above. I ordered P/N #25932571 from Amazon.com for $12. I left the old breather and hose installed and simply plugged the hose at the Evap Solenoid end just in case I need to use it later. It took me less than an hour to do the job and saved myself hundreds of dollars in part and labor.

 

Thank you, odayflor for letting us know about this!!

Edited by Machpelah
Posted

Love it when this happens from overfilling and clowns claim topping off is ok.

 

Sent from my Nokia 5190 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...