Jump to content

Suv Tests


Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1...ison/index.html

 

I found this on another forum, its a test between the Tahoe, Expedition, Armada, and Sequoia. All I got to say is that it wasn't good for GM. The thing I found the most hilarious is you always see the GM adds about there mpg and this showed that the Sequoia with the 5.7L and a 6spd trans got the same gas milage as a Tahoe with the 5.3L, AFM, and 4spd trans :rolleyes:

 

Quick Summery

#1 Toyota Sequoia

#2 Nissan Armada

#3 Ford Expedition

#4 Chevy Tahoe

 

(Hope this isn't a repost.)

Posted
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1...ison/index.html

 

I found this on another forum, its a test between the Tahoe, Expedition, Armada, and Sequoia. All I got to say is that it wasn't good for GM. The thing I found the most hilarious is you always see the GM adds about there mpg and this showed that the Sequoia with the 5.7L and a 6spd trans got the same gas milage as a Tahoe with the 5.3L, AFM, and 4spd trans :rolleyes:

 

Quick Summery

#1 Toyota Sequoia

#2 Nissan Armada

#3 Ford Expedition

#4 Chevy Tahoe

 

(Hope this isn't a repost.)

 

 

It's not.

Posted
showed that the Sequoia with the 5.7L and a 6spd trans got the same

That's not unexpected because of the 6spd advantage of the toyota. If the 5.3 had a 6 spd attached, it would of had better mileage. :dunno:

Posted

I agree the 5.3 would get better gas milage with a 6spd but I found it comical that GM always boasts about their mpg rating and put down toyota for their mpg rating and when it came down to real world driving the toyota averaged the same mpg as GM without the retarded AFM.

Posted

I "think" the recent ads you're referring to for GM are for their hybrid SUV's, compared to the other manufacturer's non-hybrid SUV's. That hardly seems a fair comparison, but all the manufacturers do that.

 

I think I've seen Tundra ads claiming "most horsepower in its class," but when you read the fine print, it says "comparison of base engines and drivetrains." They all do tricks like that, comparing their best stuff to the competitions' inferior stuff.. :dunno:

Posted

Yeah I know the companies are always trying to one up the others. I was referring to all the Howie Long commercials about the Silverado compared to the Tundra. But either way companies are always going to be bad mouthing one another so :dunno:

Posted
showed that the Sequoia with the 5.7L and a 6spd trans got the same

That's not unexpected because of the 6spd advantage of the toyota. If the 5.3 had a 6 spd attached, it would of had better mileage. :dunno:

 

That 6-spd can only deliver better mileage if geared for mileage. Toyota's problem with fuel mileage comes from the 4:56 axles behind their 6 spd, negating the 2nd OD advantage. The 5.7/6-spd Tundra I test drove a couple years ago was a running fool but turning way too fast for good mileage.

Posted
That 6-spd can only deliver better mileage if geared for mileage. Toyota's problem with fuel mileage comes from the 4:56 axles behind their 6 spd, negating the 2nd OD advantage. The 5.7/6-spd Tundra I test drove a couple years ago was a running fool but turning way too fast for good mileage.

 

The Tundra does seem to fair pretty well against the 5.3 in mixed driving, but highway speeds above 70 mph... it starts to show worse performance. It also seems to take a while to warm up, since folks are reporting significantly lower numbers for winter short commutes than what the 5.3L does. They're putting out an additional 65 HP across the rpm range though and getting decent mpg numbers with that 5.7/6-spd combo... impressive.

Posted
Yeah I know the companies are always trying to one up the others. I was referring to all the Howie Long commercials about the Silverado compared to the Tundra. But either way companies are always going to be bad mouthing one another so :dunno:

 

Um, the Silverado and the Tundra are NOT suvs. duh!

Posted
Yeah I know the companies are always trying to one up the others. I was referring to all the Howie Long commercials about the Silverado compared to the Tundra. But either way companies are always going to be bad mouthing one another so :dunno:

Um, the Silverado and the Tundra are NOT suvs. duh!

THANK YOU, Jeff! I was thinking the same thing! He's talking about SUV's and then throws pickups into the conversation about "what he was talking about"!? :troll:

 

:D

Posted
Motor Trend has Toyota's tool so far down their throat they can't think or see straight.....

:dunno: I've noticed that..

 

 

Didn't Toyota win like truck of the year or something a year ago? isn't this the same truck where the tailgate welds break apart when you try and load something into the back of it?

Posted

All I know is my real world experience. My best friend has a 5.7l Tundra (and yes I am still friends with him... :dunno: ) and of course I have a 07 Vmax. I regularly average 1.5 to 2 mpg better than him.

 

Regardless of mileage, even if my truck average 5mpg less than his, there is not a single thing on that truck I like as well as mine. Looks, interior, ride, bed/tail gate that flaps in the wind, etc.

 

And I agree a better comparison would be a 6 speed to 6 speed comparison.

Posted
Um, the Silverado and the Tundra are NOT suvs. duh!

 

Yes I am highly aware that the Silverado and Tundra are not SUV's but they run the same setup as the SUV's (Motor/Transmissions) as to why I commented on the trucks. Duh!

 

And I agree a better comparison would be a 6 speed to 6 speed comparison.

 

I also agree a 6spd to 6spd comparison would be better but at the time the people at GM had there heads up there butts and didn't make a 6spd trans.

 

Regardless of my comments about the Silverado to Tundra, the article still shows how bad GM is doing. I personlly love the way the Tahoes look and considered getting one for my wife but that has since changed.

 

Motor Trend has Toyota's tool so far down their throat they can't think or see straight.....

 

Even if that is true why didn't the GM place higher than last. :dunno:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
    • New to diesel trucks. I happened to find my oil cooler leaking oil externally with only 4,000 miles on the truck. I didn’t realize this was an issue until I started researching it. Dealer is going to replace it under warranty but I’m wondering if there’s anything GM is working on to fix this issue. I’ve heard the oil filter used is the same as they use on their V6 motors and that’s what is causing the problems. Should I switch to a bigger filter or keep using the OEM recommended? 
    • So, GMCustomerService:  Judging by the Update History pictured above, is this truck missing any updates that it actually needs. If it's just for the infotainment system, the radio is working fine and no trouble with SeriusXM. and Android Auto is working fine wirelessly with my phone. Some months ago, an update notice was sent to my truck. I approved the update and it finished saying that the update was successful, but it seems that whatever that update was, it didn't actually get installed - at least not if I'm to go by the Update History shown above.   So, again, are there any updates that this truck really should have? I've checked with my dealer but they're reluctant or commit to anything and if I want them to check, they require a $200.00 fee just to check it out and then I'd have to pay for the actual update(s).    Ignorance is bliss, and if none of the updates goes to fixing any mechanical discrepancies, I'll just leave things as is.  
    • Hey everyone, I recently had an issue with my 07 2500HD GMT900. My DRL’s stay on at all times. Right front turn and right mirror turn signal indicator stay on solid at all times. By “at all times” I mean the only way to make them go off is disconnecting the battery. I tore the headlight assemblies out, tried disconnecting the harnesses to eliminate bad wiring at the harness, I unplugged the headlight switch, no change and the mirror turn signal still stayed on. My first thoughts were : Bad bulb and/or socket somewhere, under hood fuse panel bad, bcm bad, tail light or trailer wiring problem, or some random short to power in the harness.  Possibly a bad ground but unlikely. I had a big clue in the fuse panel, it had a burnt smell. I started pulling every fuse that had to do with DRL or right turn/park lamp. Nothing made the right directional turn off but pulling the DRL2 fuse made the DRL’s go out.  After studying wiring diagrams, I found that both problems had that fuse panel in common, the bcm also controls both problems but knowing the fuse panel had a burnt smell I removed and disassembled the fuse panel and found a little corrosion on the printed circuit board.  I ordered a new fuse panel from Amazon for like $260. When it arrived I installed it, and put everything back together, the problem was fixed. I figured the fuse panel needed to be replaced anyway so that was a logical place to start. Hopefully this story helps someone in the future. Regretfully I didn’t scan for codes before I did everything.
    • That stinks. I’m sitting on the side of the road right now with the same issue. Never had an issue before taking it in for the ground strap recall. Now I’m outside of warranty and they’ll probably want $200 just to diagnose what they already “fixed”. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...