Jump to content

Led Light Upgrade Questions

georgecdisc

Recommended Posts

georgecdisc Enthusiast

georgecdisc

Posted
Posted

I have a 2008 Silverado and I am looking into upgrading all the lights in the tail light housing and turn signals in the front of the truck to LED (all or some, depends on prices). I have a few questions though to make sure I do the job correctly. I tried searching these forums but found nothing that answers them.

 

1. What bulbs are actually used in the housings? Sylvania says one thing, other sites say another. Curious as to what is actually put in (3157, 3156, etc) all the housings. Is there any instances (such as the reverse lights) that only really use one filament (ie. of a 3157) and I can put in a 3156 to get the full capability of the light?

 

2. I know that many people have issues finding LED lights that are bright enough and have a good omni-direction output. Has anyone had experience with the bulbs from this site: http://www.autolumination.com/ . This site looks like they have some intense lighting, with good side projecting LEDs to illuminate the stock reflectors in the housing. Are there any other sites that people would recommend to buy bulbs from. I don't want to skimp out and end up with a lit brake light that is dimmer than just a normal illuminated tail light.

 

3. Is an electronic flasher module upgrade required for this model year? Will it eliminate the directional-blinker-sound?

 

4. I've heard if you have a red lens you should get red LEDs to optimize the throughput (this way ~100% of the created light actually passes through instead of being filtered). How true is this?

 

5. I find the stock reverse lights pretty weak, other than LED lights are there any other solutions to this (different incadescent bulb with higher output, if there is currently a dual filament (3157) but only one is used can I put in a bulb with 1 filament (3156))?

 

At the end of the day I want results that have the same (or greater) brightness as the stock bulbs in all operations.

brims Senior Enthusiast

brims

Posted
Posted

You will still need a load added to the wiring because these trucks have the flash fast when it doesn't detect enough load. Or you can try to get the dealer to flash the BCM for no bulb detection.

 

 

I have heard a few times that red LEDs behind a red lens is bad, you should go with white bulbs. The factory bulbs are white and they give plenty of output.

 

I looked at autolumination and wasn't impressed by their stuff. No specs on their LEDs.

Frost Enthusiast

Frost

Posted
Posted
I have a 2008 Silverado and I am looking into upgrading all the lights in the tail light housing and turn signals in the front of the truck to LED (all or some, depends on prices). I have a few questions though to make sure I do the job correctly. I tried searching these forums but found nothing that answers them.

 

1. What bulbs are actually used in the housings? Sylvania says one thing, other sites say another. Curious as to what is actually put in (3157, 3156, etc) all the housings. Is there any instances (such as the reverse lights) that only really use one filament (ie. of a 3157) and I can put in a 3156 to get the full capability of the light?

 

2. I know that many people have issues finding LED lights that are bright enough and have a good omni-direction output. Has anyone had experience with the bulbs from this site: http://www.autolumination.com/ . This site looks like they have some intense lighting, with good side projecting LEDs to illuminate the stock reflectors in the housing. Are there any other sites that people would recommend to buy bulbs from. I don't want to skimp out and end up with a lit brake light that is dimmer than just a normal illuminated tail light.

 

3. Is an electronic flasher module upgrade required for this model year? Will it eliminate the directional-blinker-sound?

 

4. I've heard if you have a red lens you should get red LEDs to optimize the throughput (this way ~100% of the created light actually passes through instead of being filtered). How true is this?

 

5. I find the stock reverse lights pretty weak, other than LED lights are there any other solutions to this (different incadescent bulb with higher output, if there is currently a dual filament (3157) but only one is used can I put in a bulb with 1 filament (3156))?

 

At the end of the day I want results that have the same (or greater) brightness as the stock bulbs in all operations.

 

Out of curiosity, why not just purchase a set of LED tails and bumper lights for the turn signals? Price ain't bad on Ebay.....as for the electronic flasher, I ran into an issue with the "racing blinker" on mine when I swapped the tails and bumper lights for LED. Load resistors didn't work and the generic electronic flasher from Autozone didn't either. Grote had an electronic flasher for my 03, I'm sure there's one for your 08.' Napa is an authorized distributor for Grote, but they're much cheaper if you poke around online.

georgecdisc Enthusiast

georgecdisc

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Out of curiosity, why not just purchase a set of LED tails and bumper lights for the turn signals?

 

I find after market units gaudy. I like the stock setup but would prefer to have nice quick, brighter blinkers/brake/reverse lights. I've also seen the "cheap" set of LED tails on a trailblazer and a yukon once. Brake lights so dim in the middle of the day. Any of the nicer sets are ~$300.

jrrod2004 Senior Enthusiast

jrrod2004

Posted
Posted
Out of curiosity, why not just purchase a set of LED tails and bumper lights for the turn signals?

 

I find after market units gaudy. I like the stock setup but would prefer to have nice quick, brighter blinkers/brake/reverse lights. I've also seen the "cheap" set of LED tails on a trailblazer and a yukon once. Brake lights so dim in the middle of the day. Any of the nicer sets are ~$300.

 

 

 

I guess the GMT900s are different. Mine look pretty good:

 

 

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff89/jr...do-Tail-Day.gif

 

 

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff89/jr...os/100B3003.jpg

 

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff89/jr...os/100B3051.jpg

 

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff89/jr...os/100B3040.jpg

 

the camera does not do any justice...

georgecdisc Enthusiast

georgecdisc

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I guess the GMT900s are different. Mine look pretty good:

 

I don't like the big square matrix of led lights. I have a thing for the more stock look, something that looks more natural. Those do look like some impressive lights though, what brand are they?

brims Senior Enthusiast

brims

Posted
Posted

The GMT900s do not have a flasher unit, it is controlled by the BCM, so if you want to get rid of the fast flash, you need to have the dealer reprogram for no bulb outage detection or use a load.

georgecdisc Enthusiast

georgecdisc

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The GMT900s do not have a flasher unit, it is controlled by the BCM, so if you want to get rid of the fast flash, you need to have the dealer reprogram for no bulb outage detection or use a load.

What size load resistor would I use? I'm sure this depends on how many light bulbs I change out. Where is a convenient location to put the resistor?

Griptruk Enthusiast

Griptruk

Posted
Posted

I bought all LED bulbs for my last car and installed them, took them out right away without even hitting the road. They really didn't work on the car, as far as lighting up the housing, they just look like a bright dot in the middle. I have seen this on many cars that have swapped to LED bulbs in stock housings and it never looks as good as stock.

 

Believe me, I love LEDs as much as the next guy, if not more, but this application is not suited to the directional light that LEDs project. The reflectors are intended to light up from one hot spot right in the middle, not a light projecting straight out the back of the vehicle. I really think this is one of those mods that people convince themselves is better than stock because they spent time and money installing them and because it's different than stock.

 

Any vehicle with LED lights from the factory are designed with and array (or matrix like you said) that light up the entire housing, not with one bright bulb in the middle.

 

I think you will be disappointed with the results if you proceed with your plan.

 

-Jer

georgecdisc Enthusiast

georgecdisc

Posted
  • Author
Posted
The reflectors are intended to light up from one hot spot right in the middle, not a light projecting straight out the back of the vehicle.

 

...

 

Any vehicle with LED lights from the factory are designed with and array (or matrix like you said) that light up the entire housing, not with one bright bulb in the middle.

I have been looking at some more LED taillights, some of them don't look so bad after giving it a second chance. It really depends on the layout I guess. Some speak to me as sleek and others just seem to be a square of bulbs. I found one set that closely resembles the stock housing, but filled with LEDs inside. Other ones have one/two rows of verticle LEDs, seems like it would not be sufficient at all.

 

And when you speak of "projecting straight out the back" those are the horrible LEDs. The one's I would have thought about using are actually a tower of side facing LEDs meant to reflect on the stock housing. I have yet to see anyone give me real results with a GOOD bulb. I don't want to spend $50 on an expensive, supposedly good set, and find out they are still dim. I agree, the rear facing bulbs won't do anything for what I want.

Sierra in the Sand Enthusiast

Sierra in the Sand

Posted
Posted

I have a 2008 Silverado and I am looking into upgrading all the lights in the tail light housing and turn signals in the front of the truck to LED (all or some, depends on prices). I have a few questions though to make sure I do the job correctly. I tried searching these forums but found nothing that answers them.

 

I have a hard time understanding why it would be an "upgrade". LEDs offer some energy savings, but at current prices, it's a no-brainer that ya don't go there. Five years from now, maybe.

georgecdisc Enthusiast

georgecdisc

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I have a hard time understanding why it would be an "upgrade". LEDs offer some energy savings, but at current prices, it's a no-brainer that ya don't go there. Five years from now, maybe.

 

It is an upgrade as far as brightness and blinker (de)illumination speed. I feel they look nicer, if done properly. I was asking specific questions to gather more knowledge about the matter. What I would buy, if there is anything out there bright enough, what I need to make it work. For you it may be a no-brainer, but for me it is something I am looking into. I am researching... being told that "ya don't go there" is not really answering any of my questions.

Frost Enthusiast

Frost

Posted
Posted
I have a hard time understanding why it would be an "upgrade". LEDs offer some energy savings, but at current prices, it's a no-brainer that ya don't go there. Five years from now, maybe.

 

It is an upgrade as far as brightness and blinker (de)illumination speed. I feel they look nicer, if done properly. I was asking specific questions to gather more knowledge about the matter. What I would buy, if there is anything out there bright enough, what I need to make it work. For you it may be a no-brainer, but for me it is something I am looking into. I am researching... being told that "ya don't go there" is not really answering any of my questions.

 

 

I'm with ya, I think 90% of the LED brake lights look too ricey. But there are plenty of sets out there that look close to stock, you just have to look around a bit to find a set you like. I love mine, they have the same setup as the stock lenses and the LED's light up the entire road. 10x brighter than stock and clean looking.

georgecdisc Enthusiast

georgecdisc

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I love mine, they have the same setup as the stock lenses and the LED's light up the entire road. 10x brighter than stock and clean looking.

Do you have a picture of the lights lit/not lit by chance? I do like the ones that look closer to stock. They seem less flashy but are still functional in the aspect I am looking for. I really do no like any taillights with chrome (outside the reverse light reflector).

brims Senior Enthusiast

brims

Posted
Posted
The GMT900s do not have a flasher unit, it is controlled by the BCM, so if you want to get rid of the fast flash, you need to have the dealer reprogram for no bulb outage detection or use a load.

What size load resistor would I use? I'm sure this depends on how many light bulbs I change out. Where is a convenient location to put the resistor?

 

 

That one I do not know, hopefully someone else will know that.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • newdude
      6.2L L87 Powertrain Engine Noise (Lifter Failure) Question

      By newdude · Posted

      Engine failure requires radiator replacement per GM if it contains an engine oil cooler.  They do NOT want them flushed.  Radiator replacement is also required for the 6.2 recall if the engine fails.   Here is the TSB the dealer is referring to - 22-NA-074 1..2    Its a slightly older version, but the current version of it covers all model years 2000-2026.  So if enough failure debris was present, it gets an oil cooler.  If that is part of the radiator, it gets a radiator.  Also, same for oil cooler lines.  Those get replaced.     Now something like a 2.7 Turbo which uses an oil to water heat exchanger for the oil cooler, the radiator would be left alone but the oil cooler would be replaced, as well as any lines.  
    • txab
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By txab · Posted

      Doing the right thing, replacing both valves is the way to go. The valves with the ball leak far more often than the schrader. Never cared for them. The accumulator really should be replaced if the system has had no pressure in it and it was a keeper, but since you're looking to sell it, bet you can get by. Did you pull the orifice screen and see what was there?   Shame you can't get 134a. Hopefully the previous repairs included dye.   Some of the R4s I messed with developed leaks where the line sets connected or the front seal. Had one where the HPCO was leaking. Front seal would only leak under pressure. See any obvious oily spots?   I've got nitrogen I use to test pressure and to help dry the system prior to evacuation.   Keep up the good work
    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      Next time you're on a road trip to a state where you can still buy it stock up on 12oz cans, you might look into getting certified so you can buy it where you are as well. When they switched from R12 to R134a the test for certification was easy, they basically just wanted the $25
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Getting greedy...   The AC pump has been replaced at least once per service records, and it's been recharged twice since 2018 or so, in approximately 2 year intervals between those charges.   It was done at the same shop...clearly they were enjoying the revenue of recharging the system periodically versus actually tracking down and fixing the leak. I learned that the owner was 88 years old when she passed in 2023, so maybe they assumed only a temporary fix was needed anyway.   The system is basically empty now, the compressor spins freely, so I'm guessing it "just needs a recharge".   I vacuumed it down, and it has basically held overnight. Doesn't appear to leak under vacuum, check! So it must leak under pressure. I don't have a way to pressurize the system and pressurizing it with shop air wouldn't be great for the air dryer (which is probably toast anyway?)   The dryer (accumulator? I'm not an AC expert) has a Schrader valve, but the high side has an old ball-type valve, which are notorious for leaking. It's clearly had schmutz blown out of it at one point because the line/area next to the valve is coated old black crud, which I assume is AC refrigerant residue/oil, or maybe even dirty dye. I think I'll roll the dice and replace the valves. I have a black light around here somewhere so I'll find it and shine it around the engine bay in the dark to see if there's any dye.   I can't think of another way to track down the leak other than injecting some dye (if it doesn't have any) and having it charged up. We can't buy R134a off the shelf here anymore, so I'll run it up to Jiffy Lube and have them do it. I think I have a coupon. At the very least, the charge should last long enough for a year or two, according to history. I think this truck will be long gone by then. But cold AC is a selling point.    
    • clowe1243
      6.2L L87 Powertrain Engine Noise (Lifter Failure) Question

      By clowe1243 · Posted

      Got the truck back today.  Called them yesterday to get an update, and miraculously my truck is finished?!?! The $13k out the door was complete bullshit!  Ended up being over $14k.  They added some bullshit service bulletin that I cant even find, where they replaced my radiator without telling me or asking me, and charging me for it.  Need to do more research into it, cause they leaked the first delivered radiator was ran over by FedEX.  Sounds like bullshit to me. 2.5 Months for an engine swap, which ended up being remanufactured, not new; ****ing ridiculous.  Brakes are squishy as hell, not sure if its from sitting.  Will give a couple days to see it that figures it self out.  GAVE IT BACK TO ME WITH 1 GALLON OF GAS!  Just filled the tank the day before drop off, more bullshit.  My dash cam SD card was formatted, not really much I can do about that. 3 year, 100k GM warranty at least.  Time to sell it and say **** off to GM.  Bad experience.  Cant wait for the survey email to come through.  Overpriced Raptor R, here I come!

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...