Jump to content

Painted Or Chrome

cev103

Which door handle do you prefer?  

73 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

cev103 Enthusiast

cev103

Posted
Posted

As the poll states, I want to replaced the black molded door handles with either the Chrome or Painted door handles. I can't make up my mind on which ones I like better, so I figured I'd get some help.

 

Also, is there any pros or cons with either one?

Porter_ Enthusiast

Porter_

Posted
Posted

definitely painted. door handles should match the body not the trim. creates a cleaner, more congruent overall look.

Matt_ Senior Enthusiast

Matt_

Posted
Posted

On your color (which is my all time favorite color and wish i could've gotten btw)... Chrome

 

On darker colors like black, dark blue, etc.... then painted to match

Stylous Enthusiast

Stylous

Posted
Posted

:cheers: Five of the people who replied on here said the preferred something OTHER then what is currently on their truck! :rolleyes:

 

 

Did they just not get around to it or are they using old pictures?

Matt_ Senior Enthusiast

Matt_

Posted
Posted

^^ hey man you have a nice truck and all, but i think the max size for a sig image is 500 wide x 200 tall.... :rolleyes:

Stylous Enthusiast

Stylous

Posted
Posted
^^ hey man you have a nice truck and all, but i think the max size for a sig image is 500 wide x 200 tall.... :rolleyes:

 

I'm a truck owner...what did you expect! :cheers:

cev103 Enthusiast

cev103

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On your color (which is my all time favorite color and wish i could've gotten btw)... Chrome

 

On darker colors like black, dark blue, etc.... then painted to match

 

Thanks.....all though I wouldn't have an issue with sacrificing my color for a Denali upgrade :rolleyes:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      The filtering to wear relationship goes like this:      'Relative Engine Life "Factor" new divided by the factor old. So 8/3= 2.67. That result is the multiplier thus if a motor had an effective life of 100K using a filter with a 45 micron rating at a Beta ratio of 75 then a filter with a micron rating of 10 at a Beta of 75 would improve expected engine life to 267,000 miles.    Wear metals are an indirect indicator. Less is better and the motor lives longer but there isn't a multiplier like there is for filtration so well documented. Most of that has to do with the sensitivity of the wear metals tests themselves. The read a 'slice' of the spectrum but not the absolute values for the entire spectrum. So a general indicator that is used WITH the results of other tests. Two others considered in this post.    There is also the influence of corrosive wear which may be seen in the wear metals but separate from load based or viscosity mitigated indication. It's a small graph but the gray line is wear vs the TBN/TAN crossover. Not as useful as it used to be as there are now new chemistries for acid remediation that don't show up in standard UAO testing. They will catch up or be found liars. Only two possible outcomes, eh?             
    • mikeyk101
      TCM Tuning 6L80E

      By mikeyk101 · Posted

      One thing that comes up over and over is that the torque converters are the weak link. Many of the failed transmissions have the same thing in common. The torque converter grenades and then metal torque converter shards end up destroying the transmission. One of the best things you can do is if your transmission is still fully functional, change out to one of the aftermarket billet torque converters. There are several good choices mentioned in different threads here to make your choice. After that, then you can decide about trans tuning. My trans failed at around 95,000 miles. It got replaced under the GM protection plan. The remanufactured trans comes with a 100,000 mile /3 year warranty. I still have just under 1 year left. So far, so good. As long as it's still working good next year, an aftermarket torque converter is going to get installed early spring. If the trans and OEM torque converter fail by then, I will get it replaced under warranty and immediately have an aftermarket torque converter installed. A warranty replacement trans of a replacement trans will no longer have the warranty so I will bulletproof it from the get go.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Gas Prices

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      You got'a be cooking right now. Just looked at the weather map. Yuck!    We are right back to $4 today.    
    • CamGTP
      Gas Prices

      By CamGTP · Posted

      Pushing $4.00 a gallon in most places, still $3.75 in town but it's going to spike tomorrow for sure.   Diesel back up to $4.60-5.00.
    • calgator73
      LCA bolts

      By calgator73 · Posted

      I really appreciate the response.  I guess I was confused about torque angle vs torque angle yield.  The individual bolts don't have a warning on reuse but the part number for the LCA nuts does.   Regarding the purpose of the moog grease fittings on their bolts .. Guessing to reduce possibility of corrosion locking the cams or seizing to the bushing inserts.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...