Jump to content

92 K1500 Help


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 92 GMC K1500 with about 150k on the odometer. I am looking to move from Omaha, Ne to Anchorage, Ak. I will be towing a trailer with about 10k on it and a full 8' bed.

 

I am looking to rebuild the engine, but I know that the computers can be a real pain if you go much over stock. I will generally use the truck as a tow/haul rig. Does anyone have any suggestions/options?

 

Before I leave the truck will have a 3/4 - 1 ton running gear (solid front axle!).

 

Plus my brake light stays on all the time. It gets brighter if you hit the E-brake.

Posted

can't help with the power question but on my 89 K1500 the brake light ( in the dash i am assuming) was due to the anti-lock module being bad but never bothered to replace it as i really didn't see the need hope that helps

Posted
can't help with the power question but on my 89 K1500 the brake light ( in the dash i am assuming) was due to the anti-lock module being bad but never bothered to replace it as i really didn't see the need hope that helps
Posted
can't help with the power question but on my 89 K1500 the brake light ( in the dash i am assuming) was due to the anti-lock module being bad but never bothered to replace it as i really didn't see the need hope that helps

 

Posted

First off, don't get caught towing that kind of weight. You will be well over the GVW (Gross Vehicle Weight) and the GCVW (Gross Combined Vehicle Weight). The fines for this are rather steep, at least in Pennsylvania they are.

 

If you are planning to rebuild the engine and add all of the additional equipment equal to a 3/4 or 1 ton, you would be better served to buy a newer 3/4 or 1 ton capable of hauling and towing to your requirements.

 

Remember even if you do add all of the equipment needed to make it a 3/4 ton your title still shows 1/2 ton and any law enforcement officer is obligated to enforce the laws based on the stated GVW and GCVW.

Posted

Mike raises some good points above. Also, a stronger rebuilt engine would not be the end of that story. In my honest opinion, the transmission, brakes, and suspension would really suffer under that kind of loading if not upgraded as well. This would cost a lot of $$$.

 

If I'm reading it right, this is just a one-time move correct? If purchasing a newer 3/4 ton is not an option, have you considered renting one for the haul? That would really save your own rig.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
    • // Thank you, also for your  response. More information is always good. This 2013 GMC is most likely my 'forever truck"-I'm 77 and retired...and truck only has 42K on it-very clean-so I try to keep it that way.  Tks again for your  response- glenn
    • I started my install this weekend. Everything was pretty straight forward but I ran into one issue with running power through the firewall. The nipple grommet on my High Country already has a small harness running through it - has anyone else ran into this issue? And on the engine bay side, does the wire basically just penetrate the factory wiring boot? I did this on my '22 Trail Boss and it seems much easier but thats been a few years. My other thought would be possibly drilling a new hole adding a rubber grommet just to the lower left of the factory hole. Thoughts?   Has anyone used a T-harness off the Bose amp and obtained power from there? It seems a little odd that such a small amp needs 3 power leads
    • ///// Ok--Thanks for that info--I could not find yesterday when I looked for the specs on that NAPA filter what I wanted. Their website is not very user friendly. I buy all teh filters for  our three vehicles once or twice a year. Have always run NAPA Gold on everything I own....I buy it thru my Son's account for his business-which he has a Heavy Equipment repair shop-one reason he uses NAPA so much-they have such a full line of coverage for just about anything/anywhere- He gets s  good discount because of volume bought. Anyway-Thank you -Sir for your response.   glenn
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...