Jump to content

2009 Silverado/Sierra 1500 Diesel


Recommended Posts

Posted

GM is going to debut a light duty diesel truck in 09

 

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article...NEWS99/60824015

 

The only problem is, that at current fuel prices the diesel would have to priced around 1.5K more than the 5.3L truck to have a somewhat equal cost/benefit ratio after a 4 year ownership period (just some numbers I tossed in my calculator). A 3/4 ton diesel truck is about 6K more than a gas powered one... so.... would this even be worth it?

 

What do y'all think?

Posted

maybe i am mistaken but that article stated that the new light duty diesel will produc 360HP DEAR GOD

Posted

When folks calculate the return on investment for the additional ~$6k of cost for the diesel truck, they seldom include resale value in their calculation. After 100k miles and 5 years of life, a diesel truck is often worth $6k more than an identical used gas truck. And this doesn't consider fuel saved during that time period.

Posted

I think that Diesel durability and fuel economy will win many consumers. I am very interested in it.

 

Who designed this engine? It says GM introduced it, but is this a joint venture with someone or strictly a GM engine?

 

Jansen

Posted
I think that Diesel durability and fuel economy will win many consumers.  I am very interested in it. 

 

Who designed this engine?  It says GM introduced it, but is this a joint venture with someone or strictly a GM engine?

 

Jansen

 

 

 

 

GM along with Isuzu designed the Duramax but its built in Dayton Oh. I doubt the 360 HP will stand because usually ths the gross HP before fuel economy & emissions are factored in.

The cost of the option is $6000 currently but the emissions add on for 2007 will bring it up to about $7-8000 and the LD 1500 has tighter emission to boot.

Posted

No, it says the Duramax produces 360 horsepower. Plus, all of the pickups 1500-3500 are light duty trucks. This new engine could be for the 2500-3500 trucks only, doesn't specify 1500.

Posted

reminds me of the middle 90's when they started to introduce the 1500hd with the 6.5L and the 2500 up were getting the turbo model.

 

normaly people willing to shuck out the extra $$ will shuck out the extra $$ for the 2500+ since it comes out to about 1500 difference. unles they add big $$ to the 2500 diesel.

Posted
No, it says the Duramax produces 360 horsepower.  Plus, all of the pickups 1500-3500 are light duty trucks.  This new engine could be for the 2500-3500 trucks only, doesn't specify 1500.

 

 

 

 

Exactly!

Posted
No, it says the Duramax produces 360 horsepower.  Plus, all of the pickups 1500-3500 are light duty trucks.  This new engine could be for the 2500-3500 trucks only, doesn't specify 1500.

 

 

 

Read it again, it says the new engine will "PRODUCE UP TO 360 HP". Later it says the Duramax also produces a maximum of 360 HP. I bet this new engine will be on a 1500 series truck. As far as payback time, if you are only keeping the truck for 4 years, why buy a diesel. My 1500 is 5 years old now, perfect shape and plan to keep it 3 more. I would definately consider the new engine in a 1500. :cheers:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...