Jump to content

Request For Suggestions: Full-size Forum Split


Recommended Posts

Posted

Howdy folks,

First- thank you very much for visiting and being a part of GM-Trucks.com

 

As we approach our 10-year mark Josh and I are looking at simple things we can do to help keep the forum properly organized. It's no surprise that the full-size forum is the most active section on GM-TC and we feel that it's finally time to split things up into more organized and defined sections now that traffic is at an all time high.

 

At first glance, I see a need to address the differences between the GMT-800 and GMT-900 platform. Perhaps something along the lines of this...

 

- General Full-Size (The current Full-Size forum)

- GMT-800 Truck (1999-2006 Silverado & Sierra)

- GMT-800 SUV (2000-2006 Suburban, Yukon, & Escalade)

- GMT-900 Truck (2007-Current Silverado & Sierra)

- GMT-900 SUV (2007-Current Suburban, Yukon, & Escalade)

 

But, honestly, I'm not sure I'm qualified to really be 100% sure of what you, the forum public, would like. All I know is that it seems silly to lump so many years, makes, and platforms into the same forum. I know we've hashed this before and never taken action but believe now is the time to do so.

 

What do you think??

Posted

I think it would be a great idea to split them up. The only other way is to get folks use to putting [GMT-900] in their titles. An example would be "[GMT-900] Exhaust Recommendations".

 

I like your idea better, but if the majority of the forum is against it, then the title thing might be a reasonable alternative.

Posted

I agree...a split would be nice...not sure if splitting trucks and SUV is needed, you would have a better idea being you see the traffic pattern

Posted

 

:lol: Gets my vote... and I like the idea too of the denali group split. Even though I don't have one, it's a good section to have.

Posted

As long as the "View New Posts" stays the same where you can see all of the posts, to me it doesn't really matter and the split would help organize a little bit.

Posted

heres how i would do it:

 

1) classic trucks (pre-gmt400)

2) gmt400 trucks & suv's

3) gmt800 trucks & suv's

4) gmt900 trucks & suv's

 

^^^ and make those "sub" forums to the General Fullsize forum.

 

i dont think Denali's and Escalades need their own subforum.... almost all of the questions are the same (what size tires, how to level, etc) so why be redundant?

 

keep it simple imo.

Posted

and just in case some of you guys arent aware.... there's an entire website/forum dedicated to Denali trucks & suv's and there are quite a few members there; but even with all of the members the forum is extremely slow.. i dont see it being any better here especially since there arent many "Denali" specific questions... so i just think it'd be a waste. $.02

Posted

I vote NO. Reason being I really don't think there is enough traffic to support that many different Forums. I guess I'm used to my other favorite message board where at any given time there are 500-4000 ppl posting and you get instant numerous responses to threads. Here you may start a thread and have to wait 10-30 minutes depending on time of day to get a response. I don't mind the questions concerning other model year trucks and SUV's as I may have input having owned one in the past.

 

I like the idea of recommending that users be more specific in their thread titles though. Just my 2 pennys.

Posted

I would like to see 800/900 trucks together, and 800/900 suvs together.

 

If it is split up to much when someone is looking for input there will be less traffic to view a topic.

Posted

I don't see the need. Not to be a b@tch, but we already have forums for specifics like Audio and Tires, but people always post in the general forum instead, and mods don't usually move those post to the proper sub-forums.

Posted

i believe that splitting it up a little would greatly help, however i do not care how you split it up. i do however think the best way would be:

gmt900 trucks&suvs

gmt800 trucks&suvs

and so fourth....make a poll to find out man, maybe add in some area's of the united states as well, like northeast, southeast, north, northwest, midwest, south west, west, and south...and split the states up into each category so we could find out if any other members happen to live near us...that's how f150online does it, no saying we should follow ford's ways though ;)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,044 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...