Jump to content

BF Goodrich Long Trail TA's


Recommended Posts

Posted
The BFG Long Trails were on my list when I bought tires for my truck.  I think they should give decent traction along with a fairly quiet ride.
Posted
I had them in 31's on a ZR2 Blazer and they were a great tire, just didnt have the look for a ZR2 (not a very rugged looking tire). They seemed to last really long, I had 20,000 miles on it when I traded and they still looked brand new! They were great in the rain and good in the snow, not too good in the mud though. If you dont plan on off roading ALOT you will be happy with them.
Posted
I had them on my F 150(company truck)when I picked it up at the dealership.I rolled em for 40,000.Not an bad tire but basicly a highway tire.I found the rubber to be soft cause when making the slightest turns the tires would squeal.I have put coopers on since then and I like these alot better.All in all a descent tire in my opinion.....Gun :D
Posted
I have had  a set of Long Trails (31x10.50R15) on my truck for about 6000 miles (just had them rotated).  So far they are a big improvement over the tiger pucks that came with my truck, which is a 1998 C1500.  They have a nice quite ride.  They have a decent tread pattern.  Certainly not an all-terrain, but not strictly a highway only tire.  They do well in the rain.  Not sure on snow yet, as we have only had a few flakes.  So far I would buy them again.  Thanks to a Sam's Club screw up I got all four for around $265.
Posted

I'm running 265D Long Trails on stock alloy wheels. Excellent wet weather traction. 18K miles and very little wear and hold balance very well. Rotated every 6K. Doesn't snow much in South Texas, but they are not very good off-road. On the other hand I've had A/T's and found they threw too many rocks and were much noisier on the highway. I highly recommend the Long Trails.

 

Happy Motoring! :D

Posted
I have had  a set of Long Trails (31x10.50R15) on my truck for about 6000 miles (just had them rotated).  So far they are a big improvement over the tiger pucks that came with my truck, which is a 1998 C1500.  They have a nice quite ride.  They have a decent tread pattern.  Certainly not an all-terrain, but not strictly a highway only tire.  They do well in the rain.  Not sure on snow yet, as we have only had a few flakes.  So far I would buy them again.  Thanks to a Sam's Club screw up I got all four for around $265.

Well after driving through about 3-5 inches of snow this morning on my way to work I am a happy camper.  They do much better than the original tiger paws.  For a 2wd truck I had no problems.  The extra width and the gov-lock may have helped when taking off though.  Never even kicked the abs on.  The old tires would set the abs off rather easily before in snow, plus I think a taller tire is supposed to even make it worse, not in this case.

Posted
I'm confused.  How or why would the abs kick on or be affected when taking off due to a different tire?

 

Rick

I wasn't trying to relate the taking off with the abs.  I can see the cornfusion after reading what I wrote.  When stopping I never had the abs kick on.  

 

What I have been told is when going to a larger diamter tire, the abs can become more sensitive due to a larger lever arm (tire height) the brakes have to overcome and/or control.  This may or may not be caused by not reprogramming the ecu for the new tire size, which I haven't done...yet.  Never could get a straight answer out of the dealers, had to come in first.  Plan on getting a superchips tuner some day to correct the tire size.

Posted

I had them on my 97 Tahoe.

 

They were a quiet, long lasting tire that delivered decent overall traction.  Not up to par in looks or overall traction of say a BFG A/T.  But more than sufficient for where I took the thing off roading.

 

I just turned it back in (Lease) in July with around 55,000 miles on it and I'd guess it still had half the tread left on them.  So they could've easily gone another 30-50k miles.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...