Jump to content

GMC Sierra Height Difference


Recommended Posts

Posted

I just got my new 2012 Sierra after having many issues with the CPO 2008 Sierra. I couldn't help but notice that my 2008 was taller than this new 2012 am I crazy or is there something to this? I know that the 2008 didn't have a lift or anything.

Posted

I have went from a 2007 NNBS to a 2010, and now to a 2012. All have been Sierra 1500 crew cab 4x4 models. And I haven't noticed any height difference in any of the three.

Posted

Lots of things could be different- suspension type, tire/wheel size, 2WD vs 4WD and so on. Is the new truck exactly the same option wise?

Posted

Ya except the 2012 came with the convience package. The sales rep said the 08 were 2" taller and they lowered the trucks to cater to females.

 

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

Posted

I think most of the difference can be attributed to suspension package. There are a couple threads about the z71 to z60 difference. Recently compared my z60 to a friend's z71 and I am 1" lower. I have the convenience pkg and he didn't, but I attribute the difference to the shocks. If I'm not mistaken the rim size shouldn't matter as long is it is all OEM parts. The 20s and 18s are the same diameter when you take the rubber into account too.

Posted

Ya except the 2012 came with the convience package. The sales rep said the 08 were 2" taller and they lowered the trucks to cater to females.

 

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

 

 

According to the brochures for 2008- 2012, they show a slight overall height difference depending on suspension package and tire size ordered.

 

The max overall height for the 2008 model was 76.4"

 

Overall height for the 2012

-Extended Cab 73.6 - 73.9

-Crew 73.7" - 73.8"

 

 

So yes you are right, your 2008 may have been a little higher than your new 2012 depending on what package your previouis truck had.

Posted
I attribute the difference to the shocks.

 

The shocks have nothing to do with the height of a vehicle. Tires and suspension does.

Posted
I attribute the difference to the shocks.

 

The shocks have nothing to do with the height of a vehicle. Tires and suspension does.

 

 

Ummm, yeah..........Shocks are part of your suspension.

Posted
I attribute the difference to the shocks.

 

The shocks have nothing to do with the height of a vehicle. Tires and suspension does.

 

 

Ummm, yeah..........Shocks are part of your suspension.

 

 

Unless you have coilovers that are managing both jobs, or airshocks and such, shocks do not affect the height of your vehicle. Springs carry the load, shocks control the rebound of the springs.

Posted
I attribute the difference to the shocks.

 

The shocks have nothing to do with the height of a vehicle. Tires and suspension does.

 

 

Ummm, yeah..........Shocks are part of your suspension.

 

 

Unless you have coilovers that are managing both jobs, or airshocks and such, shocks do not affect the height of your vehicle. Springs carry the load, shocks control the rebound of the springs.

 

 

let me rephrase that then... I think most of it depends on your suspension package.

Posted

Unless you have coilovers that are managing both jobs, or airshocks and such, shocks do not affect the height of your vehicle. Springs carry the load, shocks control the rebound of the springs.

 

 

Not sure if you are aware of it BUT these trucks do come with front coilovers.

 

Like I said in post #6, suspension package has a lot to do with the height of your off the lot OEM truck.

Would be interested to see a new 2012 side by side with an older model with same suspension package.

Posted

Unless you have coilovers that are managing both jobs, or airshocks and such, shocks do not affect the height of your vehicle. Springs carry the load, shocks control the rebound of the springs.

 

 

Not sure if you are aware of it BUT these trucks do come with front coilovers.

 

Like I said in post #6, suspension package has a lot to do with the height of your off the lot OEM truck.

Would be interested to see a new 2012 side by side with an older model with same suspension package.

 

 

I suppose I would refer to the front suspension of the newer trucks as having 'struts'. You are right that the 'strut' package combines the shock and spring. However, if you remove the load dampening capability of the 'strut', I think the truck will still sit at the same height.

 

True coilovers tend to have the ability to have the spring rates and dampening capabilities adjusted/changed with readily available components by way of design.

 

Overall I just want to say that when folks look to what we know as a conventional shock to carry loads, as with air shocks and such, those mounting points, in most cases, were not designed to carry the forces that load bearing will put on them.

Posted

Correct, we run TRUE coilovers on the front of our race cars and they are fully adjustable by turning the "slider". The "coilover" "strut" argument just came up here recently, seems to come up all the time..LOL

 

 

 

I am still interested as to why such a difference is listed in overall height difference between model years.Same suspension package and all, the 2012's have a lower overall height...Anyone know for sure what has been changed of what parts are different?

Posted

is it possible the difference between a truck with iron vs. aluminum motors? I've found that my truck (2009 SLT Z71) with an aluminum 5.3L tends to be higher than other stock crew cabs.

Posted

is it possible the difference between a truck with iron vs. aluminum motors? I've found that my truck (2009 SLT Z71) with an aluminum 5.3L tends to be higher than other stock crew cabs.

 

 

Interesting...........Are the bed rails the same height or is it just your front end that sits higher?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,094 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...